IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nwe/eajour/y2020i2p300-310.html

Path Dependence: Determinants and Impacts of Technology Adoption

Author

Listed:
  • Simeon Simeonov

    (University of World and National Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria)

Abstract

Today’s world heavily relies on sustained technological advancements. Yet, consumers’ preferences for one technology over another are not necessarily predicated on transparent or rational reasons. That is, in a sequence of events later decisions are not entirely independent on previous ones. Historical choice patterns paired with positive feedback may subsequently reinforce one’s entrenched ways of thinking. This resultant contingency, referred to as path dependence, may tip the balance in favor of one particular piece of technology over more superior ones. A better comprehension of the phenomena in terms of technology adoption suggests a greater probability of attaining the most optimal outcome. Thereby, the current paper aims to address the subtle corresponding determinants and impacts of technology adoption. Relevant studies thereat were selected, critically assessed, and integrated into the follow-up literature review. A thorough view at the inferior QWERTY keyboard attributed its entrenchment on a market level to three interrelated factors: technical interrelatedness, system scale economies, and quasi-irreversibility of investment. Although more superior alternatives were available, the QWERTY keyboard layout is nowadays a leading standard worldwide.

Suggested Citation

  • Simeon Simeonov, 2020. "Path Dependence: Determinants and Impacts of Technology Adoption," Economic Alternatives, University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria, issue 2, pages 300-310, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:nwe:eajour:y:2020:i:2:p:300-310
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.unwe.bg/doi/eajournal/2020.2/EA.2020.2.07.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carolina Castaldi & Giovanni Dosi & Evita Paraskevopoulou, 2011. "Path dependence in technologies and organizations: a concise guide," Working Papers 11-04, Eindhoven Center for Innovation Studies, revised Jun 2011.
    2. Benjamin Krischan Schulte, 2015. "Staying the Consumption Course," Springer Books, Springer, edition 127, number 978-3-658-08788-3, December.
    3. Liebowitz, S J & Margolis, Stephen E, 1995. "Path Dependence, Lock-in, and History," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 11(1), pages 205-226, April.
    4. David, Paul A, 1985. "Clio and the Economics of QWERTY," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 75(2), pages 332-337, May.
    5. Bernhard Ebbinghaus, 2009. "Can Path Dependence Explain Institutional Change? Two Approaches Applied to Welfare State Reform," Chapters, in: Lars Magnusson & Jan Ottosson (ed.), The Evolution of Path Dependence, chapter 8, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. Benjamin Krischan Schulte, 2015. "Theoretical Foundation – Path Dependence, Consumer Behavior, and Service Relationship Research," Springer Books, in: Staying the Consumption Course, edition 127, chapter 2, pages 7-65, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brousseau, Eric & Raynaud, Emmanuel, 2011. "“Climbing the hierarchical ladders of rules”: A life-cycle theory of institutional evolution," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 79(1), pages 65-79.
    2. Goldthau, Andreas & Sovacool, Benjamin K., 2012. "The uniqueness of the energy security, justice, and governance problem," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 232-240.
    3. Sanjay Gosain, 2007. "Realizing the vision for web services: Strategies for dealing with imperfect standards," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 53-67, March.
    4. Christian Dahl Winther, 2007. "Optimal research effort and product differentiation in network industries," Economics Working Papers 2007-19, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University.
    5. Hunt, Shelby D., 1997. "Resource-advantage theory and the wealth of nations: Developing the socio-economic research tradition," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 335-357.
    6. Vialle, Pierre & Song, Junjie & Zhang, Jian, 2012. "Competing with dominant global standards in a catching-up context. The case of mobile standards in China," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 832-846.
    7. Moldaschl, Manfred, 2010. "Innovation in sozialwissenschaftlichen Theorien oder: Gibt es überhaupt Innovationstheorien?," Papers and Preprints of the Department of Innovation Research and Sustainable Resource Management 8/2010, Chemnitz University of Technology, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    8. Ruttan, Vernon W., 1996. "Sources Of Technical Change: Induced Innovation, Evolutionary Theory And Path Dependence," Bulletins 12974, University of Minnesota, Economic Development Center.
    9. Magrini, Marie-Benoit & Anton, Marc & Cholez, Célia & Corre-Hellou, Guenaelle & Duc, Gérard & Jeuffroy, Marie-Hélène & Meynard, Jean-Marc & Pelzer, Elise & Voisin, Anne-Sophie & Walrand, Stéphane, 2016. "Why are grain-legumes rarely present in cropping systems despite their environmental and nutritional benefits? Analyzing lock-in in the French agrifood system," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 152-162.
    10. Gigante, Anna Azzurra, 2016. "“Reviewing Path Dependence Theory in Economics: Micro–Foundations of Endogenous Change Processes”," MPRA Paper 75310, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Giovanni Dosi & Richard Nelson, 2013. "The Evolution of Technologies: An Assessment of the State-of-the-Art," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 3(1), pages 3-46, June.
    12. Rodolphe Durand & Robert M. Grant & Tammy L. Madsen & David P. McIntyre & Arati Srinivasan, 2017. "Networks, platforms, and strategy: Emerging views and next steps," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(1), pages 141-160, January.
    13. Moldaschl, Manfred, 2010. "Why innovation theories make no sense," Papers and Preprints of the Department of Innovation Research and Sustainable Resource Management 9/2010, Chemnitz University of Technology, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    14. Kverndokk, Snorre & Rosendahl, Knut Einar & Rutherford, Thomas F., 2004. "Climate policies and induced technological change: Impacts and timing of technology subsidies," Memorandum 05/2004, Oslo University, Department of Economics.
    15. Luigi Marengo & Paolo Zeppini, 2016. "The arrival of the new," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 171-194, March.
    16. Wu, Jay, 2013. "Accumulated choices, cultural triangle and economic growth," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 158-169.
    17. John Foster, 2017. "Prior Commitment and Uncertainty in Complex Economic Systems: Reinstating History in the Core of Economic Analysis," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 64(4), pages 392-418, September.
    18. Vanloqueren, Gaëtan & Baret, Philippe V., 2009. "How agricultural research systems shape a technological regime that develops genetic engineering but locks out agroecological innovations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 971-983, July.
    19. Carolina Castaldi & Giovanni Dosi, 2003. "The Grip of History and the Scope for Novelty: Some Results and Open Questions on Path Dependence in Economic Processes," LEM Papers Series 2003/02, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    20. Joanna Dzionek-Kozlowska, 2010. "Market versus government in the light of the discussion about path dependence," Ekonomia i Prawo, Uniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika, vol. 6(1), pages 87-100, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D11 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Economics: Theory
    • D91 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making
    • E11 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - General Aggregative Models - - - Marxian; Sraffian; Kaleckian
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nwe:eajour:y:2020:i:2:p:300-310. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Vanya Lazarova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/unweebg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.