IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nms/untern/10.5771-0042-059x-2021-2-175.html

Usefulness, Credibility and Scientific Norms: Reflections on Our Third Responsibility

Author

Listed:
  • Tsui, Anne S.

Abstract

This essay takes a brief stock of the progress in the transformation of business research toward tackling the grand challenges and solving many wicked problems facing business and society today. Efforts are underway in journals, schools, academic associations and accreditation agencies to encourage attention on the societal impact of faculty research in business schools. This transformation is long overdue, and it reflects the will of the scientific community to self-correct the dual crises of research credibility and research-practice gap that dominated the business research ecosystem in the past three decades. Reflecting on the journey of this self-correction as a co-founder of the Responsible Research in Business and Management network, I draw on Robert Merton’s normative structure of science and the idea of scientific freedom and scientific responsibility, to suggest five scientific norms for the business and management research community as part of our third responsibility, in addition to our responsibilities for usefulness and credibility. Accepting this third responsibility will ensure that going forward, we will continuously and consistently deliver on our two major responsibilities of producing both credible and useful knowledge for better business practices and a better world.

Suggested Citation

  • Tsui, Anne S., 2021. "Usefulness, Credibility and Scientific Norms: Reflections on Our Third Responsibility," Die Unternehmung - Swiss Journal of Business Research and Practice, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 75(2), pages 175-187.
  • Handle: RePEc:nms:untern:10.5771/0042-059x-2021-2-175
    DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2021-2-175
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/0042-059X-2021-2-175
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5771/0042-059X-2021-2-175?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lewin, Arie Y. & Chiu, Chi-Yue & Fey, Carl F. & Levine, Sheen S. & McDermott, Gerald & Murmann, Johan Peter & Tsang, Eric, 2016. "The Critique of Empirical Social Science: New Policies at Management and Organization Review," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(4), pages 649-658, December.
    2. George A. Akerlof, 2020. "Sins of Omission and the Practice of Economics," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 58(2), pages 405-418, June.
    3. James J. Heckman & Sidharth Moktan, 2020. "Publishing and Promotion in Economics: The Tyranny of the Top Five," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 58(2), pages 419-470, June.
    4. Luigi Zingales, 2015. "Does Finance Benefit Society?," NBER Working Papers 20894, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Luigi Zingales, 2015. "Presidential Address: Does Finance Benefit Society?," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 70(4), pages 1327-1363, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dani Rodrik, 2018. "Populism and the economics of globalization," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 1(1), pages 12-33, June.
    2. Steven J. Davis & John C. Haltiwanger & Kyle Handley & Ben Lipsius & Josh Lerner & Javier Miranda, 2021. "The economic effects of private equity buyouts," Jena Economics Research Papers 2021-013, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    3. Girardone, Claudia & Kokas, Sotirios & Wood, Geoffrey, 2021. "Diversity and women in finance: Challenges and future perspectives," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    4. Stefano Di Bucchianico, 2020. "A note on financialization from a Classical-Keynesian standpoint," Department of Economics University of Siena 824, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
    5. Vahabi, Mehrdad & Klebaner, Samuel, 2023. "Une nouvelle perspective sur la prédation, le conflit, le capitalisme et le changement institutionne (Une évaluation critique de l’école de régulation), entretien de Mehrdad Vahabi avec Samuel Klebaner [A New Perspective on Predation, Conflict, Ca," MPRA Paper 119567, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Ian Webster, 2022. "Making the municipal capital market in nineteenth‐century England," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 75(1), pages 56-79, February.
    7. Max Deter, 2020. "Prosociality and Risk Preferences in the Financial Sector," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 1075, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    8. Berger, Allen N. & Molyneux, Phil & Wilson, John O.S., 2020. "Banks and the real economy: An assessment of the research," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    9. van Dijk, Mathijs A. & van Dalen, Hendrik P. & Hyde, Martin, 2020. "Who bears the brunt? The impact of banking crises on younger and older workers," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 17(C).
    10. Wang, Jiaxin & Guo, Xu & Sun, Di & Huang, Rui, 2024. "Alcohol culture and employee treatment," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 96(PB).
    11. Cheah, Chee Keong & Masih, Mansur, 2017. "Does the growth of islamic bank financing depend on stock market growth? evidence from Malaysia," MPRA Paper 106192, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Aleksi Pitkäjärvi & Matteo Vacca, 2024. "Striking Out: Biases and Losses of Retail Option Traders," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 24-039/IV, Tinbergen Institute.
    13. Clark, Brian & Ebrahim, Alireza, 2022. "Risk shifting and regulatory arbitrage: Evidence from operational risk," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    14. Hélène Rainelli & Hélène Rainelli-Weiss, 2019. "Recherche en finance : quand la performativité invite à la réflexivité," Post-Print halshs-02025011, HAL.
    15. Kumar, Nitish & Shaurav, Kumar, 2025. "Do disaggregated natural resources foster financial development? Evidence from linear and non-linear approaches," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    16. Fabian Scheidegger & Andre Briviba & Bruno S. Frey, 2023. "Behind the curtains of academic publishing: strategic responses of economists and business scholars," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(8), pages 4765-4790, August.
    17. Atanas Pekanov & Margit Schratzenstaller-Altzinger, 2019. "A Global Financial Transaction Tax. Theory, Practice and Potential Revenues," WIFO Working Papers 582, WIFO.
    18. Tomasz Potocki, 2022. "Locating Financial Capability Within Capability Approach – Theoretical Survey," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 1, pages 96-106.
    19. John M. Griffin & Samuel Kruger, 2024. "What is Forensic Finance?," Foundations and Trends(R) in Finance, now publishers, vol. 14(3), pages 137-243, October.
    20. Ahrens, Steffen & Bosch-Rosa, Ciril, 2023. "Motivated beliefs, social preferences, and limited liability in financial decision-Making," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nms:untern:10.5771/0042-059x-2021-2-175. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nomos.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.