IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nbb/ecrart/y2007mjuneiip29-46.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Direct investment and Belgium’s attractiveness

Author

Listed:
  • P. Bisciari

    (National Bank of Belgium, Research Department)

  • Ch. Piette

    (National Bank of Belgium, Research Department)

Abstract

Belgium, which has long had direct investment links with other countries, is participating fully in the increasingly global economy. At the end of 2005, almost half of the equity capital invested in Belgian companies as a whole was owned directly or indirectly by foreign shareholders. The purpose of the article is to analyse Belgium’s foreign direct investment (FDI) and the incoming investment from abroad, and to view it in perspective, both over time and in relation to other developed countries, especially neighbouring countries. In addition, it aims to identify the main factors determining recent developments and Belgium’s relative position in 2005, the latest year for which data on FDI stocks are available. Although influenced by the same factors as those which determine the development of FDI on a global scale, direct investment links in Belgium differ from those in other developed economies in their magnitude. In fact, the ratio between FDI flows or stocks and GDP is significantly higher in Belgium than in the majority of other developed countries, for both incoming and outgoing FDI. The scale of Belgium’s direct investment links with foreign countries reflects both its function as a financial centre, particularly via the activities of the coordination centres, and its status as a small, open economy in a European Union where integration began earlier – and has progressed farther – than in other free trade areas. In the past ten years, Belgium’s FDI has expanded constantly and at a faster pace than domestic economic activity. While outgoing FDI has, like that of other developed countries, focused more on developing countries, driven by the search for new markets and lower costs, particularly for labourintensive activities, it is nevertheless still concentrated mainly on the developed countries, including the new EU members. The main protagonists in these capital transfers, effected partly via mergers and acquisitions, are Belgian firms active in the service sector. Over the same period, incoming FDI seems to have grown a little more slowly. In terms of stock, it actually stagnated in the early years of this century. However, the recent dynamism of FDI in Belgium has been at least as favourable as in the other European countries taken as a whole, and especially the neighbouring countries. Looking at greenfield investments, which actually lead to the creation or expansion of activities, the number of projects launched in Belgium has been rising, and at a similar rate to those developed in the EU as a whole. Belgium’s main strengths in terms of activity are chemicals – including life sciences – and transport and communications, particularly logistics and distribution. In general, the main motive for FDI projects in Belgium appears to be to serve the European market, or at least its most highly developed core, which includes Belgium. When a location is being selected for a project, Belgium is therefore competing with other EU countries and, more particularly, with neighbouring countries whose economic characteristics are comparable, notably in regard to their standard of living. Compared to other EU countries, especially the new members whose economies are less advanced, Belgium has a handicap in terms of hourly labour costs but, at the same time, it offers high productivity and various advantages as regards environmental and operational criteria, especially the quality of its infrastructures.

Suggested Citation

  • P. Bisciari & Ch. Piette, 2007. "Direct investment and Belgium’s attractiveness," Economic Review, National Bank of Belgium, issue i, pages 29-46, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:nbb:ecrart:y:2007:m:june:i:i:p:29-46
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nbb.be/doc/oc/repec/ecrart/ecorevi2007_h2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul Conway & Véronique Janod & Giuseppe Nicoletti, 2005. "Product Market Regulation in OECD Countries: 1998 to 2003," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 419, OECD Publishing.
    2. John H Dunning, 1998. "Location and the Multinational Enterprise: A Neglected Factor?," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 29(1), pages 45-66, March.
    3. Bart Hertveldt & Chantal Kegels & Bernhard Klaus Michel & Bart Van den Cruyce & Joost Verlinden & Frédéric Verschueren, 2005. "Working Paper 16-05 - Déterminants de la localisation internationale, avec application aux secteurs Agoria
      [Working Paper 16-05 - Determinanten van internationale lokalisatie, met toepassing op de
      ," Working Papers 0516, Federal Planning Bureau, Belgium.
    4. Christophe Piette, 2007. "Importance et évolution des investissements directs en Belgique," Working Paper Document 107, National Bank of Belgium.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Manuel Hensmans & Guangyan Liu, 2016. "How do the normativity of headquarters and the knowledge autonomy of subsidiaries co-evolve?," iCite Working Papers WP2016-020, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    foreign direct investment; attractiveness;

    JEL classification:

    • F21 - International Economics - - International Factor Movements and International Business - - - International Investment; Long-Term Capital Movements
    • F23 - International Economics - - International Factor Movements and International Business - - - Multinational Firms; International Business

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbb:ecrart:y:2007:m:june:i:i:p:29-46. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/bnbgvbe.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.