IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v16y2025i1d10.1038_s41467-025-61106-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risks of relying on uncertain carbon dioxide removal in climate policy

Author

Listed:
  • Matilyn Bindl

    (University of Wisconsin-Madison)

  • Morgan R. Edwards

    (University of Wisconsin-Madison
    University of Wisconsin-Madison)

  • Ryna Yiyun Cui

    (University of Maryland)

Abstract

Scenarios for reaching net-zero and other climate policy goals are increasingly featuring widespread adoption of novel carbon dioxide removal (CDR) technologies. However, these technologies currently represent only a small fraction of total CDR and may face various barriers to large-scale deployment. What are the consequences of planning for levels of CDR today that may differ from those realized in the future? Here, we combine decision analysis and a global integrated assessment model (GCAM) to quantify the climate, technology, economic, and equity outcomes of planning for high or low CDR adoption under uncertainty. We find that planning for high CDR under a 2 °C target leads to minimal fossil fuel phase-out before mid-century. If large-scale CDR is not feasible, the rapid transition required after mid-century increases global stranded assets by 38%. A robust policy strategy that plans for low CDR opens up the possibility to limit end-of-century temperature change to 1.5 °C.

Suggested Citation

  • Matilyn Bindl & Morgan R. Edwards & Ryna Yiyun Cui, 2025. "Risks of relying on uncertain carbon dioxide removal in climate policy," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-12, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-61106-4
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-61106-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-61106-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-025-61106-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-61106-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.