IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mul/jrkmxm/doi10.1410-93198y2018i2p137-172.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Suffrage Extension, Government Size and National Identity in Europe Before WWI

Author

Listed:
  • Giovanni B. Pittaluga
  • Elena Seghezza
  • Pierluigi Morelli

Abstract

n the period between 1870 and 1913 suffrage was extended significantly across most European countries. However, during this time, contrary to what might be expected in line with the redistributive hypothesis, there is no evidence that redistributive policies were pursued following the extension of suffrage. In particular, there was no clear upward trend in government size in European countries nor was there a shift towards direct taxes. This conundrum can be explained in the light of the social identity hypothesis: the élite, in order to prevent redistributive policies, can find convenient to instil national feelings in the masses. This hypothesis is consistent with what happened in the decades prior to WWI, as nationalism spread across Europe, voters with belowaverage incomes tended to prioritize national interests over class interests. The result was that redistributive claims in this phase were very limited.

Suggested Citation

  • Giovanni B. Pittaluga & Elena Seghezza & Pierluigi Morelli, 2018. "Suffrage Extension, Government Size and National Identity in Europe Before WWI," Rivista di storia economica, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 2, pages 137-172.
    • Handle: RePEc:mul:jrkmxm:doi:10.1410/93198:y:2018:i:2:p:137-172
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1410/93198
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1410/93198
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kjell Hausken & Christian W. Martin & Thomas Plümper, 2004. "Government Spending and Taxation in Democracies and Autocracies," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 239-259, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fasoranti, Modupe Mary & Alimi, Rasaq Santos, 2017. "Government Size, Political Institutions and Output Growth in Nigeria," MPRA Paper 80562, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Mohammad Reza Farzanegan & Sajjad Faraji Dizaji, 2014. "Political Institutions and Government Spending Behavior in Iran," MAGKS Papers on Economics 201403, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).
    3. Sajjad F. Dizaji & Mohammad Reza Farzanegan & Alireza Naghavi, 2016. "Political institutions and government spending behavior: theory and evidence from Iran," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 23(3), pages 522-549, June.
    4. Plümper, Thomas & Neumayer, Eric, 2009. "Famine Mortality, Rational Political Inactivity, and International Food Aid," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 50-61, January.
    5. Profeta, Paola & Puglisi, Riccardo & Scabrosetti, Simona, 2013. "Does democracy affect taxation and government spending? Evidence from developing countries," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 684-718.
    6. Gnangnon, Sèna Kimm, 2021. "Aid for trade unpredictability and trade-related government expenditure in recipient-countries," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 107-125.
    7. Alexander Libman, 2012. "Democracy and Growth: Is The Effect Non-Linear?," Economic Research Guardian, Mutascu Publishing, vol. 2(1), pages 99-120, May.
    8. Balamatsias, Pavlos, 2018. "Democracy and government spending," MPRA Paper 84975, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Joan Costa-Font & Ana Rico, 2006. "Vertical Competition in the Spanish National Health System (NHS)," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 128(3), pages 477-498, September.
    10. Offiong Helen Solomon & Sibhaa Shrestha, 2014. "Does the informal sector thrive under democracy or autocracy? the case of Nepal," Journal of Developing Areas, Tennessee State University, College of Business, vol. 48(3), pages 245-267, July-Sept.
    11. Samuel Kwabena Obeng Author-Name: Daniel Sakyi, 2017. "Explaining the Growth of Government Spending in Ghana," Journal of Developing Areas, Tennessee State University, College of Business, vol. 51(1), pages 103-128, January-M.
    12. Johannes Blum & Florian Dorn & Axel Heuer, 2021. "Political institutions and health expenditure," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 28(2), pages 323-363, April.
    13. Angelo Vito Panaro, 2024. "Policy convergence in authoritarian regimes: A comparative analysis of welfare state trajectories in post‐Soviet countries," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 41(6), pages 1017-1043, November.
    14. Abel Escribà-Folch, 2009. "Do authoritarian institutions mobilize economic cooperation?," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 71-93, March.
    15. Dodlova, Marina & Lucas, Viola, 2021. "Regime security and taxation in autocracies: Who is taxed and how?," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    16. Dragoi Andreea, 2015. "Greece Crisis and The European Model of The Welfare State," Revista de Economie Mondiala / The Journal of Global Economics, Institute for World Economy, Romanian Academy, vol. 7(3).
    17. Daniel Sakyi & Samuel Adams, 2012. "Democracy, Government Spending and Economic Growth: The Case of Ghana, 1960–2008," Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research, National Council of Applied Economic Research, vol. 6(3), pages 361-383, August.
    18. Libman, Alexander, 2008. "Democracy and growth: is the effect non-linear?," MPRA Paper 17795, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Samuel Adams & Daniel Sakyi, 2012. "Globalization, Democracy, and Government Spending in Sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence from Panel Data," Chapters, in: Zlatan Delic (ed.), Globalization and Responsibility, IntechOpen.
    20. Johannes Blum, 2021. "Democracy’s third wave and national defense spending," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 189(1), pages 183-212, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:jrkmxm:doi:10.1410/93198:y:2018:i:2:p:137-172. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rivisteweb.it/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.