Economic Institutions And Competitiveness Of Economy With Emphasis On Montenegro
The competitiveness of economy has become a key term in economic trends. It is related to all strategic issues of sustainable economic development. A sure way for its preserving in unstable conditions would include increasing competition, and modernization of the economy which would lead to knowledge economy, innovations and institutional development. Knowledge and innovations also depend on development of institutions and support. This is the reason why the starting point is the hypothesis that the competitiveness of economy dominantly depends on the degree of development and the efficiency of economic institutes. This paper considers the importance of economic institutionalization, and some elementary causes and conditions that prevented a pluralistic and even monistic performance of individual economic institutes (such as competition, market regulation, etc.) in most transition countries, and led to their objective substitution by the quasi-Institutes of sociopathological and anti-institutional nature. The primary importance pluralistic synergy of economic institutions is stressed for the development of competition. The analysis of the competitiveness in Montenegro points to urgent strengthening of institutional development factors and appropriate ambient.
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Dani Rodrik & Arvind Subramanian & Francesco Trebbi, 2002.
"Institutions Rule: The Primacy of Institutions over Geography and Integration in Economic Development,"
CID Working Papers
97, Center for International Development at Harvard University.
- Dani Rodrik & Arvind Subramanian & Francesco Trebbi, 2004. "Institutions Rule: The Primacy of Institutions Over Geography and Integration in Economic Development," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 9(2), pages 131-165, 06.
- Dani Rodrik & Arvind Subramanian & Francesco Trebbi, 2002. "Institutions Rule: The Primacy of Institutions over Geography and Integration in Economic Development," NBER Working Papers 9305, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Rodrik, Dani & Subramanian, Arvind & Trebbi, Francesco, 2002. "Institutions Rule: The Primacy of Institutions Over Geography and Integration in Economic Development," CEPR Discussion Papers 3643, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Oliver E. Williamson, 2000. "The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 38(3), pages 595-613, September.
- Michael Kitson & Ron Martin & Peter Tyler, 2004. "Regional Competitiveness: An Elusive yet Key Concept?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(9), pages 991-999.
- Michael Porter, 2003. "The Economic Performance of Regions," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(6-7), pages 549-578.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mje:mjejnl:v:9:y:2013:i:1:p:63-74. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Eryk Wdowiak)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.