IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Institutional Context Of Corporate Governance And Corporate Social Responsibility

Listed author(s):
  • Andjelko Lojpur
  • Veselin Draskovic
Registered author(s):

    Specifics of particular models of corporate governance and appropriate CSR are predominantly conditioned by the character of relations between the two environments corporate (voluntary, based on market laws) and institutional (binding, based on the regulations and standards). It can be assumed that in the future all models of CSR that prefer sustainable development will be increasingly leaving the first zone and accept the rules of another environment. This paper analyses some institutional factors that have a significant impact on corporate governance and CSR evolution. The aim of this paper is to demonstrate the importance of the institutional frameworks, to analyze some key aspects and issues related to the observed phenomenon and define its contemporary position. It starts from the hypothesis that: a) institutional environment represents the most important factor that affects corporate governance development and that there is a direct subordinated dependence in the following relationship: institutional development -- corporate governance -- sustainable economic development, b) CSR gradually changes, but its position is on the line between rhetorical illusion, voluntary possibility of implementation and the need for forced (institutional) commitment, and c) utilization of institutional pluralism in the fields of corporate governance and i CSR is a precondition for overcoming of the institutional vacuum and monist quasi-institutionalization of neoliberal type. Analysis of internal and external factors of corporate governance and CSR should reveal possible reasons for its inefficiency so far in most of the transition countries. The conclusion is that it is necessary to institutionally define the achievement of balance between the economical, environmental and social imperatives.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT) in its journal Montenegrin Journal of Economics.

    Volume (Year): 9 (2013)
    Issue (Month): 1 ()
    Pages: 27-44

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:mje:mjejnl:v:9:y:2013:i:1:p:27-44
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    in new window

    1. Andelko Lojpur, 2005. "Management In The Process Of The Corporate Governance," Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT), vol. 1(1), pages 119-126.
    2. Luigi Zingales, 1997. "Corporate Governance," NBER Working Papers 6309, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Mimo Draskovic & Jelena Stjepcevic, 2012. "Institutional Framework Of Corporate Governance With Reference To The Former Yugoslav Transition Economies," Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT), vol. 8(4), pages 27-41.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mje:mjejnl:v:9:y:2013:i:1:p:27-44. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Nikola Draskovic Jelcic)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.