IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mir/mirbus/v2y2012i5p158-163.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Development of Tacit Knowledge Sharing Behaviour among Employees in Organizations

Author

Listed:
  • Miss Hathaiporn Mongkolajala

    (Graduate student in Department of Management Information Systems,Thammasat Business School, Thammasat University, Thailand)

  • Dr. Supeecha Panichpathom

    (Ph.D., Department of Management Information Systems,Thammasat Business School, Thammasat University, Thailand)

  • Dr.Atcharawan Ngarmyarn, Ph.D.

    (Department of Real Estate Business,Thammasat Business School,Thammasat University, Thailand)

Abstract

Due to the economic growth in Thailand, many organizations have recognized the importance of maintaining their employees’ knowledge and tried to create the knowledge sharing environment. In general, knowledge sharing is initiated from an individual level and extended to organizational level. Since knowledge sharing among employees is a procedure which passes on abilities and capabilities from one person to another. This study attempts to investigate the factors and relationships that influence tacit knowledge sharing behavior in an organizational context. Based on the widely accepted theory of reasoned action (TRA), we tried to develop a comprehensive model covering factors influencing intention to share both explicit and tacit knowledge. For the empirical validation, 270 responses from employees in private-sector organization in Thailand were collected via an online questionnaire. This research evaluated the influence of a series of potential factors on knowledge sharing behavior. Attitude toward knowledge sharing and subjective norms had a positive significant impact on intention to share explicit knowledge and also on intention to share tacit knowledge. In addition, intention to share explicit knowledge had direct significant relationship with intention to share tacit knowledge. Finally, intention to share tacit knowledge reflected a positive effect on knowledge sharing behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Miss Hathaiporn Mongkolajala & Dr. Supeecha Panichpathom & Dr.Atcharawan Ngarmyarn, Ph.D., 2012. "The Development of Tacit Knowledge Sharing Behaviour among Employees in Organizations," International Journal of Business and Social Research, MIR Center for Socio-Economic Research, vol. 2(5), pages 158-163, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:mir:mirbus:v:2:y:2012:i:5:p:158-163
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://thejournalofbusiness.org/index.php/site/article/view/106/105
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Qian Huang & Robert Davison & Jibao Gu, 2008. "Impact of personal and cultural factors on knowledge sharing in China," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 451-471, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lingyan Liu & Minghua Lin & Ming Yu, 2023. "Relationship of internal institutions, knowledge sharing, and technological innovation in characteristic cultural enterprises: Evidence from China," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(1), pages 515-524, January.
    2. Mohajan, Haradhan, 2016. "Sharing of Tacit Knowledge in Organizations: A Review," MPRA Paper 82958, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 15 Jun 2016.
    3. Oliveira Márcio & Pinheiro Paulo, 2021. "Factors in the Sharing of Tacit Knowledge among Volunteer Firefighters," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(9), pages 1-54, July.
    4. Márcio Oliveira & Paulo Pinheiro & João M. Lopes & José Oliveira, 2022. "How to Overcome Barriers to Sharing Tacit Knowledge in Non-Profit Organizations?," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(3), pages 1843-1874, September.
    5. Mohajan, Haradhan, 2017. "Tacit Knowledge for the Development of Organizations," MPRA Paper 83040, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 14 Mar 2017.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gordon Redding & Michael Witt, 2009. "China’s business system and its future trajectory," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 381-399, September.
    2. Cynthia Ho & Kylie Redfern, 2010. "Consideration of the Role of Guanxi in the Ethical Judgments of Chinese Managers," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 96(2), pages 207-221, October.
    3. Wayne H. Stewart Jr. & Ruth C. May & Donna E. Ledgerwood, 2015. "Do You Know What I Know? Intent to Share Knowledge in the US and Ukraine," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 55(6), pages 737-773, December.
    4. Yuan Lu & Eric Tsang & Mike Peng, 2008. "Knowledge management and innovation strategy in the Asia Pacific: Toward an institution-based view," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 361-374, September.
    5. Seckyoung Loretta Kim & Soojung Han & Seung Yeon Son & Seokhwa Yun, 2017. "Exchange ideology in supervisor-subordinate dyads, LMX, and knowledge sharing: A social exchange perspective," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 147-172, March.
    6. Cheng, Jao-Hong, 2011. "Inter-organizational relationships and knowledge sharing in green supply chains—Moderating by relational benefits and guanxi," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(6), pages 837-849.
    7. Ain Zuraini binti Zin Aris, 2013. "Requirement for Knowledge Sharing Behavior: A Review of Empirical Findings," Journal of Asian Scientific Research, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 3(6), pages 517-526, June.
    8. Gregory Wegmann & Ivan Ruviditch, 2015. "Management in China: Cultural, institutional roots and pragmatism. An inquiry in Shanghai," Working Papers hal-01104551, HAL.
    9. Emma Su & Michael Carney, 2013. "Can China’s family firms create intellectual capital?," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 657-675, September.
    10. Davison, R.M. & Martinsons, M.G. & Ou, C.X.J., 2012. "The informal entanglement of knowledge, Guanxi and technology : Evidence from China and a new theory," Other publications TiSEM 0868b515-2454-4d02-9e40-b, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    11. Jie Lou & Yulin Fang & Kai H. Lim & Jerry Zeyu Peng, 2013. "Contributing high quantity and quality knowledge to online Q&A communities," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 64(2), pages 356-371, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mir:mirbus:v:2:y:2012:i:5:p:158-163. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: M Kabir (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/csmirus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.