IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mig/bcwpap/v5y2015i1-2p25-32.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

But it does move, doesn´t it? The debate on the allocation of refugees in Europe from a German point of view

Author

Listed:
  • Petra Bendel

    (Zentralinstitut für Regionenforschung, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität ErlangenNürnberg, Bismarckstr. 1, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany)

Abstract

This article examines the current debate on the allocation of refugees, based on the principle of “shared responsibility and solidarity among the EU Member States”. Arguing that the Dublin system has failed, I discuss alternative proposals, adopting both the perspective of the Member States and the view of the applicants themselves. Whereas most research has centred on the opportunities and risks of these instruments, on their efficiency or cost-benefit-relation, I ask for the political enforceability of the possible alternatives in the light of changed power relations in the European Parliament, the Commission and the Council. I shall argue that particularly the current perception of the German government might represent a window of opportunity for a policy change.

Suggested Citation

  • Petra Bendel, 2015. "But it does move, doesn´t it? The debate on the allocation of refugees in Europe from a German point of view," Border Crossing, Transnational Press London, UK, vol. 5(1-2), pages 25-32, January-J.
    • Handle: RePEc:mig:bcwpap:v:5:y:2015:i:1-2:p:25-32
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journal.tplondon.com/index.php/bc/article/viewFile/508/398
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Menon, Anand, 2012. "The Oxford Handbook of the European Union," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199546282 edited by Jones, Erik & Weatherill, Stephen.
    2. Mathias Czaika, 2009. "Asylum Cooperation among Asymmetric Countries," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: The Political Economy of Refugee Migration and Foreign Aid, chapter 6, pages 88-113, Palgrave Macmillan.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Petra Bendel, 2015. "But it does move, doesn´t it? The debate on the allocation of refugees in Europe from a German point of view," Border Crossing, Transnational Press London, UK, vol. 2015(1503), pages 25-32, June.
    2. Daniele Schiliro, 2014. "Changes in Eurozone Governance after the Crisis and the Issue of Growth," International Journal of Social Science Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 2(2), pages 110-119, April.
    3. Brent F. Nelsen & James L. Guth, 2020. "Losing Faith: Religion and Attitudes toward the European Union in Uncertain Times," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(4), pages 909-924, July.
    4. Emmanuelle Auriol & Antonio Estache & Liam Wren-Lewis, 2018. "Can Supranational Infrastructure Regulation Compensate for National Institutional Weaknesses?," Revue économique, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 69(6), pages 913-936.
    5. Henrik Scheller & Annegret Eppler, 2014. "European Disintegration – non-existing Phenomenon or a Blind Spot of European Integration Research? Preliminary Thoughts for a Research Agenda," Working Papers of the Vienna Institute for European integration research (EIF) 2, Institute for European integration research (EIF).
    6. Scott Lavery & Davide Schmid, 2021. "European Integration and the New Global Disorder," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(5), pages 1322-1338, September.
    7. Philip Grech, 2017. "Undesired properties of the European Commission’s refugee distribution key," European Union Politics, , vol. 18(2), pages 212-238, June.
    8. Maher, Imelda & Stefan, Oana, 2019. "Delegation of powers and the rule of law: Energy justice in EU energy regulation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 84-93.
    9. Sarah Ciaglia & Clemens Fuest & Friedrich Heinemann, 2018. "What a feeling?! How to promote ‘European Identity’," EconPol Policy Reports 9, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    10. Begg, Iain & Bongardt, Annette & Nicolaïdis, Kalypso & Torres, Francisco, 2015. "EMU and sustainable integration," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 65243, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    11. Timothy J. Hatton, 2015. "Asylum Policy in the EU: the Case for Deeper Integration," CESifo Economic Studies, CESifo, vol. 61(3-4), pages 605-637.
    12. Brilé Anderson & Thomas Bernauer & Aya Kachi, 2019. "Does international pooling of authority affect the perceived legitimacy of global governance?," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 661-683, December.
    13. Rossi, Enzo, 2017. "Superseding Dublin: The European asylum system as a non-cooperative game," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 50-59.
    14. Philipp Lutz & David Kaufmann & Anna Stünzi, 2020. "Humanitarian Protection as a European Public Good: The Strategic Role of States and Refugees," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(3), pages 757-775, May.
    15. Mathias Dolls, 2019. "An Unemployment Re-Insurance Scheme for the Eurozone? Stabilizing and Redistributive Effects," EconPol Policy Reports 10, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    16. Miloslav Machoň, 2017. "Global Public Goods: The Case for the Global Earth Observation System of Systems [Globální veřejný statek na příkladu Systému systémů globálního pozorování Země]," Acta Oeconomica Pragensia, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2017(3), pages 68-83.
    17. Sharon Baute & Bart Meuleman & Koen Abts & Marc Swyngedouw, 2018. "European integration as a threat to social security: Another source of Euroscepticism?," European Union Politics, , vol. 19(2), pages 209-232, June.
    18. Dimiter Doychinov Toshkov, 2014. "The dynamic relationship between asylum applications and recognition rates in Europe (1987–2010)," European Union Politics, , vol. 15(2), pages 192-214, June.
    19. Tausch, Arno, 2015. "Europe’s Refugee Crisis. Zur aktuellen politischen Ökonomie von Migration, Asyl und Integration in Europa [Europe's Refugee Crisis. On the current political economy of migration, asylum and integra," MPRA Paper 67400, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Tim Hatton, 2015. "Setting policy on asylum: Has the EU got it right?," IZA World of Labor, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), pages 124-124, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mig:bcwpap:v:5:y:2015:i:1-2:p:25-32. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: TPLondon (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.tplondon.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.