IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mes/challe/v55y2012i4p63-77.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Frustrated Are Americans?

Author

Listed:
  • Ngina Chiteji
  • Sheldon Danziger

Abstract

The authors analyze data from an in-depth survey of about 900 residents in Detroit to determine how indebted they were. The results suggest that it will take considerably more time for Americans to feel comfortable enough to spend again. That may well mean that the long and slow economic recovery is likely to continue.

Suggested Citation

  • Ngina Chiteji & Sheldon Danziger, 2012. "How Frustrated Are Americans?," Challenge, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(4), pages 63-77.
  • Handle: RePEc:mes:challe:v:55:y:2012:i:4:p:63-77
    DOI: 10.2753/0577-5132550404
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2753/0577-5132550404
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:cbo:report:219995 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Congressional Budget Office, 2011. "Budget and Economic Outlook: Fiscal Years 2011 to 2021," Reports 21999, Congressional Budget Office.
    3. Congressional Budget Office, 2011. "Budget and Economic Outlook: Fiscal Years 2011 to 2021," Reports 21999, Congressional Budget Office.
    4. Andrew Sum & Joseph McLaughlin, 2010. "The Massive Shedding of Jobs in America," Challenge, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(6), pages 62-76.
    5. repec:cbo:report:219993 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Robert Wade, 2011. "The Economy Has Not Solved Its Problems," Challenge, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(2), pages 5-41.
    7. Andrew Sum & Ishwar Khatiwada, 2012. "Ignoring Those Left Behind," Challenge, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(2), pages 5-20.
    8. Congressional Budget Office, 2011. "Budget and Economic Outlook: Fiscal Years 2011 to 2021," Reports 21999, Congressional Budget Office.
    9. repec:cbo:report:21999 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. repec:cbo:report:219996 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. repec:cbo:report:219997 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. repec:cbo:report:219994 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:challe:v:55:y:2012:i:4:p:63-77. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Chris Longhurst) or (Rebekah McClure). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/MCHA20 .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.