IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Philosophical Perspectives on the Social Contract Theory: Hobbes, Kant and Buchanan Revisited. A Comparison of Historical thought Surrounding the Philosophical Consequences of the Social Contract and Modern Public Choice Theory. (English version)


  • Ph.D. Canditate Mathias ROYCE

    () (Dip. MktgComm (BAW), Dip. Mgt (Open), MBA (Open) is a current Doctoral Candidate in Political Economy [D. PolEc] at the SMC Swiss Management Center in Zurich/Switzerland. His research interests include contemporary European and pan-Asian/Pacific Comparative Politics, Austrian Economics and Libertarian Political Philosophy. SMC Swiss Management Center Balz Zimmermannstrasse 7, CH-8302 Zurich-Kloten, Switzerland)


To what extent is a prevalent social order that is constructed upon the freedom of the individual impacted by decisions taken in the domain of positive economics? How does the Hobbesian reductionist view of the state of nature correlate to the Kantian view of selfruled individualism expressed through rationality and autonomy? Applying Hobbesian thought in a democratic-economic context explains established and customary behaviour patterns of political economy in a reduced environmental setting. In precisely such setting individuals remain individuals on the basis of their ability to freely enter into contracts and any political means are attached to these individuals governed through an artificially constructed social contract. In the value-based and moral understanding of the social contract in its Kantian interpretation, the individual demands dignity and respect. This consequently justifies the individual as an end, rather than only a mean. How does Hobbesian and Kantian philosophy measure-up to Buchanan’s public choice theory and to what degree does the inclusion of morals in public choice lead to a normative diffusion of the social contract theory?

Suggested Citation

  • Ph.D. Canditate Mathias ROYCE, 2010. "Philosophical Perspectives on the Social Contract Theory: Hobbes, Kant and Buchanan Revisited. A Comparison of Historical thought Surrounding the Philosophical Consequences of the Social Contract and ," Postmodern Openings, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 4, pages 45-62, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:lum:rev3rl:v:4:y:2010:i::p:45-62

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item


    Social contract; philosophical consequences; modern public choice theory; Kant; Hobbes; Buchanan;

    JEL classification:

    • A23 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics - - - Graduate
    • H00 - Public Economics - - General - - - General


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lum:rev3rl:v:4:y:2010:i::p:45-62. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Amariei Mirela). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.