IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/lum/rev11d/v24y2019ip107-135.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Europe: Multinational Federal State

Author

Listed:
  • Constantin Manolache

    (Associate Professor Ph.D. "Petre Andrei" University of Iasi, Romania)

Abstract

The founding of the Multinational Federal State of Europe could be the greatest geopolitical achievement of the 21st century. The arguments of this assertion are in favor of the founding of a single European state entity, a process that would bring Europe out of a state of political and geographical interim, giving it a new architecture with features of legitimacy, uniqueness and originality. In this way, Europe would have its own identity and would be politically and legally recognized internationally. Europe's identity reconstruction as Multinational Federal State would fit into the fundamental elements of this creation: New Constitution; efficient European political institutions; modern European administration; new European capital in a central-continental geographical location; own military technology complex; signs and symbols of European state identity recognition. This article intends to analyze in a constructive spirit ten themes (challenges) of the construction of the Multinational Federal State of Europe, such as: politics, leadership, management, sovereignty, legal, historical, ideological, development strategies, communication, military.

Suggested Citation

  • Constantin Manolache, 2019. "Europe: Multinational Federal State," Anuarul Universitatii „Petre Andrei” din Iasi / Year-Book „Petre Andrei” University from Iasi, Fascicula: Drept, Stiinte Economice, Stiinte Politice / Fascicle: Law, Economic Sciences, Political Scien, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 24, pages 107-135, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:lum:rev11d:v:24:y:2019:i::p:107-135
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.18662/upalaw/36
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://lumenpublishing.com/journals/index.php/upa-sw/article/view/2650
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.18662/upalaw/36?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hans-Jörg Trenz & Pieter de Wilde, 2009. "Denouncing European Integration. Euroscepticism as reactive identity formation," ARENA Working Papers 9, ARENA.
    2. Wendt, Alexander E., 1987. "The agent-structure problem in international relations theory," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 41(3), pages 335-370, July.
    3. Hans-Jörg Trenz & Pieter de Wilde, 2009. "Denouncing European integration: Euroscepticism as reactive identity formation," RECON Online Working Papers Series 10, RECON.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kelly Benetatou & Yannis Katsoulacos, 2020. "Legal Standards and Economic Analysis in Antitrust Enforcement: An Empirical Investigation for the Case of Greece," GreeSE – Hellenic Observatory Papers on Greece and Southeast Europe 144, Hellenic Observatory, LSE.
    2. Persefoni Zeri & Charalambos Tsekeris & Theodore Tsekeris, 2019. "The social power dynamics of post-truth politics: How the Greek youth perceives the “powerful” foreigners and constructs the image of the European partners," GreeSE – Hellenic Observatory Papers on Greece and Southeast Europe 142, Hellenic Observatory, LSE.
    3. Adela Toscano-Valle & Antonio Sianes & Francisco Santos-Carrillo & Luis A. Fernández-Portillo, 2022. "Can the Rational Design of International Institutions Solve Cooperation Problems? Insights from a Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-22, June.
    4. Kaplan Yilmaz, 2017. "China’s OBOR as a Geo-Functional Institutionalist Project," TalTech Journal of European Studies, Sciendo, vol. 7(1), pages 7-23, June.
    5. Roxana Bobulescu, 2011. "Critical Realism versus Social Constructivism in International Relations," The Journal of Philosophical Economics, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, The Journal of Philosophical Economics, vol. 4(2), pages 37-64, May.
    6. Lukas Hermwille & Lisa Sanderink, 2019. "Make Fossil Fuels Great Again? The Paris Agreement, Trump, and the USFossil Fuel Industry," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 19(4), pages 45-62, November.
    7. Janina Grabs & Graeme Auld & Benjamin Cashore, 2021. "Private regulation, public policy, and the perils of adverse ontological selection," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(4), pages 1183-1208, October.
    8. Aura Parmentier Cajaiba & Giovany Cajaiba Santana, 2014. "Routines and Networks: Strengthening a Missed Link," GREDEG Working Papers 2014-41, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.
    9. Boryslav Brekhov, 2016. "Demokratischer Wirtschaftsfrieden," Potsdam Economic Papers 05, Universität Potsdam, Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät.
    10. Remi Maier-Rigaud, 2008. "International Organizations as Corporate Actors: Agency and Emergence in Theories of International Relations," Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2008_07, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.
    11. Rudra Sil, 2000. "The Foundations of Eclecticism," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 12(3), pages 353-387, July.
    12. Mathis L Richtmann & Lea Steininger, 2023. "From bazooka to backstop: the political economy of standing swap facilities," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 47(4), pages 681-702.
    13. Akan Malici, 2005. "Discord and Collaboration between Allies," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 49(1), pages 90-119, February.
    14. Oran Young, 2001. "The Behavioral Effects of Environmental Regimes: Collective-Action vs. Social-Practice Models," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 9-29, January.
    15. Mo Hume & Polly Wilding, 2020. "Beyond agency and passivity: Situating a gendered articulation of urban violence in Brazil and El Salvador," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(2), pages 249-266, February.
    16. Christiansen, Thomas & Jorgensen, Knud Erik, 1999. "The Amsterdam Process: A Structurationist Perspective on EU Treaty Reform," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 3, January.
    17. Jan Poruba, 2014. "New Institutionalism in Europeanization Research: Positivist or Scientific Realist Metatheory Synthesis? [Nový institucionalismus ve výzkumu europeizace: pozitivistická nebo vědecko-realistická met," Současná Evropa, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2014(2), pages 3-15.
    18. José L. García-Aguilar, 1999. "The Autonomy and Democracy of Indigenous Peoples in Canada and Mexico," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 565(1), pages 79-90, September.
    19. Katzenstein, Peter Joachim, 1990. "Analyzing change in international politics: The new institutionalism and the interpretative approach," MPIfG Discussion Paper 90/10, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    20. Sirirat Ngamsang, 2013. "Confucius Institutes as Instruments of Soft Power: Comparison with International Rivals," Journal of Education and Vocational Research, AMH International, vol. 4(10).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Multinational Federal State of Europe; Single European State Identity; politics; leadership; management; history; ideology.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K1 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law
    • K2 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law
    • K4 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lum:rev11d:v:24:y:2019:i::p:107-135. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Antonio Sandu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edituralumen.ro .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.