IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ksa/szemle/1858.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Termelőüzem ökológiai szempontú tervezése
[Ecologically oriented planning of production units]

Author

Listed:
  • Kiss, Tibor
  • Hartung, Katalin
  • Hetesi, Zsolt

Abstract

A fenntarthatóság, erőforrás-hatékonyság, hulladékmentes termelés fogalmai, megoldásai egyre inkább teret nyernek a gondolkodásunkban, a politikai irányelvekben és a vállalati stratégiákban. Sokféle előremutató törekvés irányul a problémák megoldására, bár nem minden esetben kínálnak rendszerszintű megoldást. Ebben a tanulmányban arra teszünk kísérletet, hogy egy termelő vállalat tervezésénél figyelembe vegyük az ökológiai rendszerek egyik alapvető működési elvét, a rugalmas ellenálló képességet (resilience). Az eredmények azt jelzik, hogy több, fenntarthatónak ítélhető rendszer közül van olyan, amely rendszerszintű, az ökológiai rendszerek működési elveinek is megfelel, így nagyobb eséllyel számít valóban fenntarthatónak.* Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) kód: Q01, Q57, R11, R58.

Suggested Citation

  • Kiss, Tibor & Hartung, Katalin & Hetesi, Zsolt, 2019. "Termelőüzem ökológiai szempontú tervezése [Ecologically oriented planning of production units]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(7), pages 863-886.
    • Handle: RePEc:ksa:szemle:1858
    DOI: 10.18414/KSZ.2019.7-8.863
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.kszemle.hu/tartalom/letoltes.php?id=1858
    Download Restriction: Registration and subscription. 3-month embargo period to non-subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18414/KSZ.2019.7-8.863?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kiss, Tibor & Kiss, Viktor Miklos, 2018. "Ecology-related resilience in urban planning – A complex approach for Pécs (Hungary)," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 160-170.
    2. Zhang, Yan & Zheng, Hongmei & Fath, Brian D., 2015. "Ecological network analysis of an industrial symbiosis system: A case study of the Shandong Lubei eco-industrial park," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 306(C), pages 174-184.
    3. Kurmai, Viktória, 2016. "Az almasűrítmény-termelés piaci és üzemgazdasági elemzése," GAZDÁLKODÁS: Scientific Journal on Agricultural Economics, Karoly Robert University College, vol. 60(03), June.
    4. Jiali Huang & Robert E Ulanowicz, 2014. "Ecological Network Analysis for Economic Systems: Growth and Development and Implications for Sustainable Development," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(6), pages 1-8, June.
    5. Bodini, Antonio & Bondavalli, Cristina & Allesina, Stefano, 2012. "Cities as ecosystems: Growth, development and implications for sustainability," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 245(C), pages 185-198.
    6. Goerner, Sally J. & Lietaer, Bernard & Ulanowicz, Robert E., 2009. "Quantifying economic sustainability: Implications for free-enterprise theory, policy and practice," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 76-81, November.
    7. Fiscus, Daniel A., 2009. "Comparative network analysis toward characterization of systemic organization for human–environmental sustainability," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(22), pages 3123-3132.
    8. Genovese, Andrea & Acquaye, Adolf A. & Figueroa, Alejandro & Koh, S.C. Lenny, 2017. "Sustainable supply chain management and the transition towards a circular economy: Evidence and some applications," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 66(PB), pages 344-357.
    9. Jaehn, Florian, 2016. "Sustainable Operations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 253(2), pages 243-264.
    10. Ulanowicz, Robert E., 2009. "The dual nature of ecosystem dynamics," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(16), pages 1886-1892.
    11. Ulanowicz, Robert E., 2014. "Reckoning the nonexistent: Putting the science right," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 293(C), pages 22-30.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Borrett, Stuart R. & Sheble, Laura & Moody, James & Anway, Evan C., 2018. "Bibliometric review of ecological network analysis: 2010–2016," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 382(C), pages 63-82.
    2. Ali Kharrazi & Brian D. Fath & Harald Katzmair, 2016. "Advancing Empirical Approaches to the Concept of Resilience: A Critical Examination of Panarchy, Ecological Information, and Statistical Evidence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-17, September.
    3. Carey W. King, 2016. "Information Theory to Assess Relations Between Energy and Structure of the U.S. Economy Over Time," Biophysical Economics and Resource Quality, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 1-33, December.
    4. Kharrazi, Ali & Rovenskaya, Elena & Fath, Brian D. & Yarime, Masaru & Kraines, Steven, 2013. "Quantifying the sustainability of economic resource networks: An ecological information-based approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 177-186.
    5. Ali Kharrazi & Elena Rovenskaya & Brian D Fath, 2017. "Network structure impacts global commodity trade growth and resilience," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(2), pages 1-13, February.
    6. Francisco Orlando Rosales & Brian D. Fath & Grace Yolanda Llerena, 2023. "Quantifying a virtual water metabolic network of the Metropolitan District of Quito, Ecuador using ecological network methods," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(5), pages 1304-1318, October.
    7. Kiss, Tibor & Kiss, Viktor Miklos, 2018. "Ecology-related resilience in urban planning – A complex approach for Pécs (Hungary)," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 160-170.
    8. Jørgensen, Sven E. & Nielsen, Søren Nors & Fath, Brian D., 2016. "Recent progress in systems ecology," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 319(C), pages 112-118.
    9. Mingqi Zhang & Meirong Su & Weiwei Lu & Chunhua Su, 2015. "An Assessment of the Security of China’s Natural Gas Supply System Using Two Network Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-16, December.
    10. Enora Barrau & Mathias Glaus, 2022. "Structural and Environmental Performance of Evolving Industrial Symbiosis: A Multidimensional Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    11. Jiali Huang & Robert E Ulanowicz, 2014. "Ecological Network Analysis for Economic Systems: Growth and Development and Implications for Sustainable Development," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(6), pages 1-8, June.
    12. Fang, Delin & Chen, Bin, 2019. "Information-based ecological network analysis for carbon emissions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(C), pages 45-53.
    13. Ulanowicz, Robert E., 2014. "Reckoning the nonexistent: Putting the science right," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 293(C), pages 22-30.
    14. Zhu, Xueting & Mu, Xianzhong & Hu, Guangwen, 2019. "Ecological network analysis of urban energy metabolic system—A case study of Beijing," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 404(C), pages 36-45.
    15. Katalin Hartung, 2017. "Optimal Resource Allocation at the Blue Economy Type of Firms," Financial and Economic Review, Magyar Nemzeti Bank (Central Bank of Hungary), vol. 16(3), pages 98-118.
    16. Rogetzer, Patricia & Silbermayr, Lena & Jammernegg, Werner, 2019. "Sustainable sourcing including capacity reservation for recycled materials: A newsvendor framework with price and demand correlations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 206-219.
    17. Gatti, Roberto Cazzolla & Hordijk, Wim & Kauffman, Stuart, 2017. "Biodiversity is autocatalytic," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 346(C), pages 70-76.
    18. Petersen, Alexander M. & Rotolo, Daniele & Leydesdorff, Loet, 2016. "A triple helix model of medical innovation: Supply, demand, and technological capabilities in terms of Medical Subject Headings," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 666-681.
    19. Prosman, Ernst Johannes & Cagliano, Raffaella, 2022. "A contingency perspective on manufacturing configurations for the circular economy: Insights from successful start-ups," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    20. Jacopo Zotti & Andrea Bigano, 2019. "Write circular economy, read economy’s circularity. How to avoid going in circles," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 36(2), pages 629-652, July.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • Q01 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - Sustainable Development
    • Q57 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Ecological Economics
    • R11 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes
    • R58 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - Regional Development Planning and Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ksa:szemle:1858. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Odon Sok (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.kszemle.hu .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.