IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/transp/v52y2025i3d10.1007_s11116-023-10445-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Didn’t travel or just being lazy? An empirical study of soft-refusal in mobility diaries

Author

Listed:
  • Mathijs Haas

    (KiM Netherlands Institute for Transport Policy Analysis
    Delft University of Technology)

  • Maarten Kroesen

    (Delft University of Technology)

  • Caspar Chorus

    (Delft University of Technology)

  • Sascha Hoogendoorn-Lanser

    (Delft University of Technology)

  • Serge Hoogendoorn

    (Delft University of Technology)

Abstract

In mobility panels, respondents may use a strategy of soft-refusal to lower their response burden, e.g. by claiming they did not leave their house even though they actually did. Soft-refusal leads to poor data quality and may complicate research, e.g. focused on people with actual low mobility. In this study we develop three methods to detect the presence of soft-refusal in mobility panels, based on respectively (observed and predicted) out-of-home activity, straightlining and speeding. For each indicator, we explore the relation with reported immobility and panel attrition. The results show that speeding and straightlining in a questionnaire is strongly related to reported immobility in a (self-reported) travel diary. Using a binary logit model, respondents who are predicted to leave their home but report no trips are identified as possible soft refusers. To reveal different patterns of soft-refusal and assess how these patterns influence the probability to drop out of the panel, a latent transition model is estimated. The results show four behavioral patterns with respect to soft-refusal ranging from a large class of reliable respondents who score positive on all three soft-refusal indicators, to a small ‘high-risk’ class of respondents who score poorly on all indicators. This ‘high-risk’ group also reports the highest immobility and has the highest attrition rate. The model also shows that respondents who do not drop out of the panel, tend to stay in the same behavioral pattern over time. The amount of soft-refusal expressed by a respondent therefore seems to be a stable behavioral trait.

Suggested Citation

  • Mathijs Haas & Maarten Kroesen & Caspar Chorus & Sascha Hoogendoorn-Lanser & Serge Hoogendoorn, 2025. "Didn’t travel or just being lazy? An empirical study of soft-refusal in mobility diaries," Transportation, Springer, vol. 52(3), pages 955-981, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:transp:v:52:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s11116-023-10445-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s11116-023-10445-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11116-023-10445-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11116-023-10445-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chao Chen & Caspar Chorus & Eric Molin & Bert Wee, 2016. "Effects of task complexity and time pressure on activity-travel choices: heteroscedastic logit model and activity-travel simulator experiment," Transportation, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 455-472, May.
    2. Jean-Loup Madre & Kay Axhausen & Werner Brög, 2007. "Immobility in travel diary surveys," Transportation, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 107-128, January.
    3. Mathijs Haas & Maarten Kroesen & Caspar Chorus & Sascha Hoogendoorn-Lanser & Serge Hoogendoorn, 2022. "E-bike user groups and substitution effects: evidence from longitudinal travel data in the Netherlands," Transportation, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 815-840, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Benjamin Motte-Baumvol & Julie Fen-Chong & Olivier Bonin, 2023. "Immobility in a weekly mobility routine: studying the links between mobile and immobile days for employees and retirees," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(5), pages 1723-1742, October.
    2. Weis, Claude & Axhausen, Kay W., 2009. "Induced travel demand: Evidence from a pseudo panel data based structural equations model," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 8-18.
    3. Allison McCurdy & Elizabeth E. Perry & Jessica E. Leahy & Kimberly J. Coleman & Joshua Doyle & Lydia A. Kiewra & Shelby A. Marocco & Tatiana A. Iretskaia & Madison M. Janes & Mikael Deliyski, 2024. "Gaining Traction on Social Aspects of E-Biking: A Scoping Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-19, August.
    4. Liu, Chengxi & Susilo, Yusak O. & Karlström, Anders, 2015. "Investigating the impacts of weather variability on individual’s daily activity–travel patterns: A comparison between commuters and non-commuters in Sweden," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 47-64.
    5. Shaila Jamal & Antonio Paez, 2024. "Well-being implications of immobility during COVID-19: evidence from a student sample in Bangladesh using the satisfaction with life scale," Transportation, Springer, vol. 51(5), pages 2019-2049, October.
    6. Gerike, Regine & Gehlert, Tina & Leisch, Friedrich, 2015. "Time use in travel surveys and time use surveys – Two sides of the same coin?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 4-24.
    7. Jang, Sunghoon & Rasouli, Soora & Timmermans, Harry, 2022. "The effect of task complexity on stated choice processes: The moderating role of cognitive ability," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    8. Benjamin Motte-Baumvol & Olivier Bonin & Carlos David Nassi & Leslie Belton-Chevallier, 2016. "Barriers and (im)mobility in Rio de Janeiro," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(14), pages 2956-2972, November.
    9. Bayart, Caroline & Bonnel, Patrick & Havet, Nathalie, 2018. "Daily (im)mobility behaviours in France: An application of hurdle models," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 456-467.
    10. S. Cerreia-Vioglio & F. Maccheroni & M. Marinacci & A. Rustichini, 2017. "Multinomial logit processes and preference discovery: inside and outside the black box," Working Papers 615, IGIER (Innocenzo Gasparini Institute for Economic Research), Bocconi University.
    11. Thomas Hagedorn & Jan Wessel & Marlena Meier, 2024. "Electrifying Choices: How Electric Bicycles Impact on Mode Choice and CO2 Emissions," Working Papers 40, Institute of Transport Economics, University of Muenster.
    12. Yamaguchi, Hiromichi & Nakayama, Shoichiro, 2020. "Detection of base travel groups with different sensitivities to new high-speed rail services: Non-negative tensor decomposition approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 37-46.
    13. Simone Cerreia-Vioglio & Fabio Maccheroni & Massimo Marinacci, 2020. "Multinomial logit processes and preference discovery: outside and inside the black box," Working Papers 663, IGIER (Innocenzo Gasparini Institute for Economic Research), Bocconi University.
    14. Schneider, Paul R., 2023. "From elements to policies: A Shovian social practice perspective on pathways to facilitate daily E-bike commuting," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 36-45.
    15. Motte-Baumvol, Benjamin & Nassi, Carlos D., 2012. "Immobility in Rio de Janeiro, beyond poverty," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 67-76.
    16. Salon, Deborah, 2016. "Estimating pedestrian and cyclist activity at the neighborhood scale," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 11-21.
    17. Li, Qiumeng & Fuerst, Franz & Luca, Davide, 2023. "Do shared E-bikes reduce urban carbon emissions?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    18. Cools, Mario & Creemers, Lieve, 2013. "The dual role of weather forecasts on changes in activity-travel behavior," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 167-175.
    19. Marcela Munizaga & Sergio Jara-Díaz & Javiera Olguín & Jorge Rivera, 2011. "Generating twins to build weekly time use data from multiple single day OD surveys," Transportation, Springer, vol. 38(3), pages 511-524, May.
    20. Luis Márquez & Víctor Cantillo & Julián Arellana, 2020. "Assessing the influence of indicators’ complexity on hybrid discrete choice model estimates," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 373-396, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:transp:v:52:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s11116-023-10445-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.