IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/hcarem/v26y2023i4d10.1007_s10729-023-09653-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Classification of patients with chronic disease by activation level using machine learning methods

Author

Listed:
  • Onur Demiray

    (Imperial College London)

  • Evrim D. Gunes

    (Koç University, Rumeli Feneri Yolu)

  • Ercan Kulak

    (Ministry of Health Caycuma District Health Directorate)

  • Emrah Dogan

    (Ministry of Health, Zonguldak Community Health Center)

  • Seyma Gorcin Karaketir

    (Department of Public Health, Istanbul University)

  • Serap Cifcili

    (Department of Family Medicine, Marmara University School of Medicine)

  • Mehmet Akman

    (Department of Family Medicine, Marmara University School of Medicine)

  • Sibel Sakarya

    (Koç University, Rumeli Feneri Yolu)

Abstract

Patient Activation Measure (PAM) measures the activation level of patients with chronic conditions and correlates well with patient adherence behavior, health outcomes, and healthcare costs. PAM is increasingly used in practice to identify patients needing more support from the care team. We define PAM levels 1 and 2 as low PAM and investigate the performance of eight machine learning methods (Logistic Regression, Lasso Regression, Ridge Regression, Random Forest, Gradient Boosted Trees, Support Vector Machines, Decision Trees, Neural Networks) to classify patients. Primary data collected from adult patients (n=431) with Diabetes Mellitus (DM) or Hypertension (HT) attending Family Health Centers in Istanbul, Turkey, is used to test the methods. $$44.5\%$$ 44.5 % of patients in the dataset have a low PAM level. Classification performance with several feature sets was analyzed to understand the relative importance of different types of information and provide insights. The most important features are found as whether the patient performs self-monitoring, smoking and exercise habits, education, and socio-economic status. The best performance was achieved with the Logistic Regression algorithm, with Area Under the Curve (AUC)=0.72 with the best performing feature set. Alternative feature sets with similar prediction performance are also presented. The prediction performance was inferior with an automated feature selection method, supporting the importance of using domain knowledge in machine learning.

Suggested Citation

  • Onur Demiray & Evrim D. Gunes & Ercan Kulak & Emrah Dogan & Seyma Gorcin Karaketir & Serap Cifcili & Mehmet Akman & Sibel Sakarya, 2023. "Classification of patients with chronic disease by activation level using machine learning methods," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 626-650, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:hcarem:v:26:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s10729-023-09653-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s10729-023-09653-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10729-023-09653-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10729-023-09653-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carrie Queenan & Kellas Cameron & Alan Snell & Julia Smalley & Nitin Joglekar, 2019. "Patient Heal Thyself: Reducing Hospital Readmissions with Technology‐Enabled Continuity of Care and Patient Activation," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 28(11), pages 2841-2853, November.
    2. Bulent Kilic & Sibel Kalaca & Belgin Unal & Peter Phillimore & Shahaduz Zaman, 2015. "Health policy analysis for prevention and control of cardiovascular diseases and diabetes mellitus in Turkey," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 60(1), pages 47-53, January.
    3. Samuel G Smith & Laura M Curtis & Jane Wardle & Christian von Wagner & Michael S Wolf, 2013. "Skill Set or Mind Set? Associations between Health Literacy, Patient Activation and Health," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(9), pages 1-7, September.
    4. Wang, Haifeng & Zheng, Bichen & Yoon, Sang Won & Ko, Hoo Sang, 2018. "A support vector machine-based ensemble algorithm for breast cancer diagnosis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(2), pages 687-699.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abdur Rasool & Chayut Bunterngchit & Luo Tiejian & Md. Ruhul Islam & Qiang Qu & Qingshan Jiang, 2022. "Improved Machine Learning-Based Predictive Models for Breast Cancer Diagnosis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-19, March.
    2. Joanna Błajda & Edyta Barnaś & Anna Kucab, 2022. "Application of Personalized Education in the Mobile Medical App for Breast Self-Examination," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-21, April.
    3. Akman, Mehmet & Sakarya, Sibel & Sargın, Mehmet & Ünlüoğlu, İlhami & Eğici, Memet Taşkın & Boerma, Wienke G.W. & Schäfer, Willemijn L.A., 2017. "Changes in primary care provision in Turkey: A comparison of 1993 and 2012," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(2), pages 197-206.
    4. Astorino, Annabella & Avolio, Matteo & Fuduli, Antonio, 2022. "A maximum-margin multisphere approach for binary Multiple Instance Learning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(2), pages 642-652.
    5. Meshwa Rameshbhai Savalia & Jaiprakash Vinodkumar Verma, 2023. "Classifying Malignant and Benign Tumors of Breast Cancer: A Comparative Investigation Using Machine Learning Techniques," International Journal of Reliable and Quality E-Healthcare (IJRQEH), IGI Global, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, January.
    6. Baldomero-Naranjo, Marta & Martínez-Merino, Luisa I. & Rodríguez-Chía, Antonio M., 2020. "Tightening big Ms in integer programming formulations for support vector machines with ramp loss," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(1), pages 84-100.
    7. Cho, David D. & Stauffer, Jon M., 2022. "Tele-medicine question response service: Analysis of benefits and costs," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    8. Sonja Spitzer & Daniela Weber, 2019. "Reporting biases in self-assessed physical and cognitive health status of older Europeans," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-22, October.
    9. Rebecca Meraz & Elizabeth Perry Caldwell & Jocelyn Shealy McGee, 2023. "The Relationships Among Health Literacy, Patient Activation, and Self-Care Behaviors in Adults With Heart Failure: A Cross Sectional Study," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440231, March.
    10. Blanquero, R. & Carrizosa, E. & Jiménez-Cordero, A. & Martín-Barragán, B., 2019. "Functional-bandwidth kernel for Support Vector Machine with Functional Data: An alternating optimization algorithm," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(1), pages 195-207.
    11. Giuseppe Russo & Andrea Moretta Tartaglione & Ylenia Cavacece, 2019. "Empowering Patients to Co-Create a Sustainable Healthcare Value," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-20, March.
    12. P. K. Viswanathan & Sandeep Srivathsan & Wayne L. Winston, 2022. "Multiclass Discriminant Analysis using Ensemble Technique: Case Illustration from the Banking Industry," Journal of Emerging Market Finance, Institute for Financial Management and Research, vol. 21(1), pages 92-115, March.
    13. Su Hyun Kim & Sonja Utz, 2018. "Association of health literacy with health information‐seeking preference in older people: A correlational, descriptive study," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(3), pages 355-360, September.
    14. Asunur Cezar & Srinivasan Raghunathan & Sumit Sarkar, 2020. "Adversarial Classification: Impact of Agents’ Faking Cost on Firms and Agents," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(12), pages 2789-2807, December.
    15. Sriram Somanchi & Idris Adjerid & Ralph Gross, 2022. "To Predict or Not to Predict: The Case of the Emergency Department," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(2), pages 799-818, February.
    16. Golmohammadi, Davood & Zhao, Lingyu & Dreyfus, David, 2023. "Using machine learning techniques to reduce uncertainty for outpatient appointment scheduling practices in outpatient clinics," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    17. Liang, Xijun & Zhang, Zhipeng & Song, Yunquan & Jian, Ling, 2022. "Kernel-based online regression with canal loss," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(1), pages 268-279.
    18. Kamyab Karimi & Ali Ghodratnama & Reza Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, 2023. "Two new feature selection methods based on learn-heuristic techniques for breast cancer prediction: a comprehensive analysis," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 328(1), pages 665-700, September.
    19. Singha, Sumanta & Arha, Himanshu & Kar, Arpan Kumar, 2023. "Healthcare analytics: A techno-functional perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    20. Sarah N. Alyami & Sunday O. Olatunji, 2020. "Application of Support Vector Machine for Arabic Sentiment Classification Using Twitter-Based Dataset," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(01), pages 1-13, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:hcarem:v:26:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s10729-023-09653-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.