IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i8p4482-d789323.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Application of Personalized Education in the Mobile Medical App for Breast Self-Examination

Author

Listed:
  • Joanna Błajda

    (Institute of Health Sciences, Medical College of University of Rzeszów, Kopisto 2a, 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland)

  • Edyta Barnaś

    (Institute of Health Sciences, Medical College of University of Rzeszów, Kopisto 2a, 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland)

  • Anna Kucab

    (Institute of Health Sciences, Medical College of University of Rzeszów, Kopisto 2a, 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland)

Abstract

Introduction. Mobile apps are considered intelligent tools useful in various areas of public health. The social dimension of breast cancer and the current epidemic situation require tools that may increase knowledge and improve the skills in the field of breast self-examination. The study aims to assess the use of personalized education based on algorithms with conditions in the mobile medical app for breast self-examination. Materials and methods. In total, 500 women from the Podkarpackie Province were enrolled in the study, which was a representative group for the inhabitants of this province. The subjects were randomly divided into two groups (group I: the study group including 250 people; group II: the controls of 250 people). The study group was subjected to intervention, which was personalized education on breast cancer. The method was a proprietary mobile medical app based on algorithms with conditions. The study was carried out from March 2018 to February 2019. Results. The majority of women, 77.8% (N = 389), were under 30 years of age. Only a small amount of the breast area was marked in the tactile test in both groups. In the study group, the average number of selected points was 14.86 (7.43% of the area to be examined), while in the control group it amounted to 9.14 (4.57%). The area most commonly examined in Test I in both groups was the central area of the mammary gland with the nipple. After the intervention in Test II, women from the study group marked a significantly greater area in the tactile test than women from the control group (χ 2 = 99.733; df = 6; p < 0.0001). The mean result in the study group was 22.10, while in the control group it amounted to 9.10. It was found that the breast area marked in both tests depended solely on the women’s knowledge about breast cancer ( p < 0.001). It was also found that the higher the risk of developing breast cancer, the more points in Test I were indicated by the women in the tactile test ( p = 0.0122). Conclusions. Educational mobile medical apps for breast cancer prevention may help to deal with breast cancer, which is an important public health issue. It is also important to broaden the possibilities of medical apps for breast self-examination with elements verifying the skills of the three-stage compression of the examined breast.

Suggested Citation

  • Joanna Błajda & Edyta Barnaś & Anna Kucab, 2022. "Application of Personalized Education in the Mobile Medical App for Breast Self-Examination," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-21, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:8:p:4482-:d:789323
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/8/4482/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/8/4482/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Haifeng & Zheng, Bichen & Yoon, Sang Won & Ko, Hoo Sang, 2018. "A support vector machine-based ensemble algorithm for breast cancer diagnosis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(2), pages 687-699.
    2. Esin Ceber & Meral Turk & Meltem Ciceklioglu, 2010. "The effects of an educational program on knowledge of breast cancer, early detection practices and health beliefs of nurses and midwives," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(15‐16), pages 2363-2371, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abdur Rasool & Chayut Bunterngchit & Luo Tiejian & Md. Ruhul Islam & Qiang Qu & Qingshan Jiang, 2022. "Improved Machine Learning-Based Predictive Models for Breast Cancer Diagnosis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-19, March.
    2. Priscila Biancovilli & Lilla Makszin & Faten Amer & Alexandra Csongor, 2022. "Celebrities and Breast Cancer: A Multidimensional Quali-Quantitative Analysis of News Stories Shared on Social Media," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-10, August.
    3. Astorino, Annabella & Avolio, Matteo & Fuduli, Antonio, 2022. "A maximum-margin multisphere approach for binary Multiple Instance Learning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(2), pages 642-652.
    4. Meshwa Rameshbhai Savalia & Jaiprakash Vinodkumar Verma, 2023. "Classifying Malignant and Benign Tumors of Breast Cancer: A Comparative Investigation Using Machine Learning Techniques," International Journal of Reliable and Quality E-Healthcare (IJRQEH), IGI Global, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, January.
    5. Baldomero-Naranjo, Marta & Martínez-Merino, Luisa I. & Rodríguez-Chía, Antonio M., 2020. "Tightening big Ms in integer programming formulations for support vector machines with ramp loss," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(1), pages 84-100.
    6. Onur Demiray & Evrim D. Gunes & Ercan Kulak & Emrah Dogan & Seyma Gorcin Karaketir & Serap Cifcili & Mehmet Akman & Sibel Sakarya, 2023. "Classification of patients with chronic disease by activation level using machine learning methods," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 626-650, December.
    7. Blanquero, R. & Carrizosa, E. & Jiménez-Cordero, A. & Martín-Barragán, B., 2019. "Functional-bandwidth kernel for Support Vector Machine with Functional Data: An alternating optimization algorithm," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(1), pages 195-207.
    8. P. K. Viswanathan & Sandeep Srivathsan & Wayne L. Winston, 2022. "Multiclass Discriminant Analysis using Ensemble Technique: Case Illustration from the Banking Industry," Journal of Emerging Market Finance, Institute for Financial Management and Research, vol. 21(1), pages 92-115, March.
    9. Golmohammadi, Davood & Zhao, Lingyu & Dreyfus, David, 2023. "Using machine learning techniques to reduce uncertainty for outpatient appointment scheduling practices in outpatient clinics," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    10. Liang, Xijun & Zhang, Zhipeng & Song, Yunquan & Jian, Ling, 2022. "Kernel-based online regression with canal loss," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(1), pages 268-279.
    11. Kamyab Karimi & Ali Ghodratnama & Reza Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, 2023. "Two new feature selection methods based on learn-heuristic techniques for breast cancer prediction: a comprehensive analysis," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 328(1), pages 665-700, September.
    12. Sarah N. Alyami & Sunday O. Olatunji, 2020. "Application of Support Vector Machine for Arabic Sentiment Classification Using Twitter-Based Dataset," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(01), pages 1-13, April.
    13. Che Xu & Wenjun Chang & Weiyong Liu, 2023. "Data-driven decision model based on local two-stage weighted ensemble learning," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 325(2), pages 995-1028, June.
    14. Li, Yanying & Che, Jinxing & Yang, Youlong, 2018. "Subsampled support vector regression ensemble for short term electric load forecasting," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 160-170.
    15. Qifa Xu & Zezhou Wang & Cuixia Jiang & Yezheng Liu, 2023. "Deep learning on mixed frequency data," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(8), pages 2099-2120, December.
    16. Chen, Weiyi & Zhang, Limao, 2022. "An automated machine learning approach for earthquake casualty rate and economic loss prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:8:p:4482-:d:789323. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.