IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/wjel11/v13y2023i8p52.html

Mutual Identities: Fostering Empathy between Readers and Characters in Reading a Work of Fiction

Author

Listed:
  • Maha Alatawi
  • Fawziah Harshan

Abstract

Empathy is often seen fostered through teaching of literature, particularly fiction, and influencing readers’ behavior and emotions. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between readers' and characters' mutual identities as witnessed in the form of a literary empathy created by reading a work of fiction. A qualitative research design helped in in-depth understanding of participants’ experiences, by adopting an empirical stylistic approach to conduct a thematic analysis of readers’ responses, combining stylistic-narratological analysis of two sampled texts, Amy Tan’s Two Kinds and Charles Dickens’ Oliver Twist. Both datasets were collected through a Literary Response Questionnaire (LRQ) and analyzed to understand how literature, particularly fiction, stimulated empathy in individual readers. The readers’ responses mechanism was aptly supported by Theory of mind and Decety's and Gerdes' empathy development theories to understand how readers develop mental flexibility and experience emotional empathy to understand characters’ emotions. The results revealed the intensity of readers’ connection with the characters while they introspected through the text and correlated themselves with human emotions resulting in empathy with the characters of the text. The findings imply that literature equips students and readers with the capacity to cultivate empathy through an emotional appraisal of characters.

Suggested Citation

  • Maha Alatawi & Fawziah Harshan, 2023. "Mutual Identities: Fostering Empathy between Readers and Characters in Reading a Work of Fiction," World Journal of English Language, Sciedu Press, vol. 13(8), pages 1-52, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:jfr:wjel11:v:13:y:2023:i:8:p:52
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/wjel/article/download/24028/15202
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/wjel/article/view/24028
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Steven A. Greenlaw & Stephen B. Deloach, 2003. "Teaching Critical Thinking with Electronic Discussion," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(1), pages 36-52, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stephen B. Deloach & Steven A. Greenlaw, 2005. "Do Electronic Discussions Create Critical Thinking Spillovers?," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 23(1), pages 149-163, January.
    2. Alina Lerman, 2020. "Individual Investors' Attention to Accounting Information: Evidence from Online Financial Communities," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(4), pages 2020-2057, December.
    3. Mary O. Borg & Harriet A. Stranahan, 2010. "Evidence On The Relationship Between Economics And Critical Thinking Skills," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 28(1), pages 80-93, January.
    4. Timothy C. Haab & Aaron Schiff & John C. Whitehead, 2011. "Economics Blogs and Economic Education," Chapters, in: Gail M. Hoyt & KimMarie McGoldrick (ed.), International Handbook on Teaching and Learning Economics, chapter 15, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. Dubas, Justin M. & Toledo, Santiago A., 2016. "Taking higher order thinking seriously: Using Marzano’s taxonomy in the economics classroom," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 12-20.
    6. Richet, Jean-Loup & Currás-Móstoles, Rosa & Martín, José María Martín, 2024. "Complexity in online collective assessments: Implications for the wisdom of the crowd," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    7. Stephen B. Deloach & Elizabeth Perry-Sizemore & Mary O. Borg, 2012. "Creating Quality Undergraduate Research Programs in Economics: How, When, Where (And Why)," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 57(1), pages 96-110, May.
    8. Costas Siriopoulos & Gerasimos Pomonis, 2009. "Selecting Strategies to Foster Economists' Critical Thinking Skills: A Quantile Regression Approach," International Review of Economic Education, Economics Network, University of Bristol, vol. 8(1), pages 106-131.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:wjel11:v:13:y:2023:i:8:p:52. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sciedu Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://wjel.sciedupress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.