IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jek/journl/v3y2015i1p32-45.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Statistical Evaluation Of Work Performance Factors

Author

Listed:
  • Radim MANAK

    (Vysoka skola podnikani, Ostrava, Czech Republic)

Abstract

The paper deals with work performance as a complex of different areas and views. The goal of the presented paper is to evaluate the dependences between various work performance aspects and various types of companies. It is based on an empirical research, which was realized with help of a written questionnaire, and statistical evaluation of gained data. The results should show to which extend the type of company influences approach to work performance and the correlations between individual aspects of performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Radim MANAK, 2015. "Statistical Evaluation Of Work Performance Factors," International Journal of Entrepreneurial Knowledge, Center for International Scientific Research of VSO and VSPP, vol. 3(1), pages 32-45, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:jek:journl:v:3:y:2015:i:1:p:32-45
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ijek.org/files/IJEK_1-2015v3/ijek_1-2015,v.3_manak,r..pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Feraru Andreea & Ciucescu Nicoleta, 2010. "Theoretical And Methodological Aspects Of The Professional Performances Evaluation," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(2), pages 939-944, December.
    2. Maddy Janssens & Chris Steyaert, 2009. "HRM and Performance: A Plea for Reflexivity in HRM Studies," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(1), pages 143-155, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matthijs Bal & Andy Brookes, 2022. "How Sustainable Is Human Resource Management Really? An Argument for Radical Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-14, April.
    2. De Prins, Peggy & Van Beirendonck, Lou & De Vos, Ans & Segers, Jesse, 2014. "Sustainable HRM: Bridging theory and practice through the ‘Respect Openness Continuity (ROC)’-model," management revue. Socio-economic Studies, Rainer Hampp Verlag, vol. 25(4), pages 263-284.
    3. Fiona Edgar & Alan Geare, 2010. "Characteristics of High- and Low-performing University Departments as Assessed by the New Zealand Performance Based Research Funding (PBRF) Exercise," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 20(1), pages 55-63, March.
    4. Rick Delbridge, 2014. "Promising Futures: CMS, Post-Disciplinarity, and the New Public Social Science," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(1), pages 95-117, January.
    5. Michelle Greenwood & Harry J. Van Buren, 2017. "Ideology in HRM Scholarship: Interrogating the Ideological Performativity of ‘New Unitarism’," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 142(4), pages 663-678, June.
    6. Maddy Janssens & Chris Steyaert, 2012. "Towards an Ethical Research Agenda for International HRM: The Possibilities of a Plural Cosmopolitan Framework," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 111(1), pages 61-72, November.
    7. Helen Francis & Anne Keegan, 2020. "The Ethics of Engagement in an Age of Austerity: A Paradox Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 162(3), pages 593-607, March.
    8. Mine Karatas‐Ozkan & Çağla Özgören & Sibel Yamak & Shahnaz Ibrahim & Melike Nur Tunalıoğlu & Ashly Pinnington & Katerina Nicolopoulou & Yehuda Baruch, 2022. "Dual nature of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and human resource management: A blessing or a curse?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5), pages 1578-1594, September.
    9. George Kandathil & Jerome Joseph, 2019. "Normative Underpinnings of Direct Employee Participation Studies and Implications for Developing Ethical Reflexivity: A Multidisciplinary Review," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 157(3), pages 685-697, July.
    10. Tracey Shea & Brian K. Cooper & Helen De Cieri & Cathy Sheehan, 2012. "Evaluation of a perceived organisational performance scale using Rasch model analysis," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 37(3), pages 507-522, December.
    11. Luftim CANIA, 2014. "The Impact of Strategic Human Resource Management on Organizational Performance," Economia. Seria Management, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 17(2), pages 373-383, December.
    12. Vijay Kumar Shrotryia & Upasana Dhanda, 2020. "Exploring Employee Engagement Using Grounded Theory: Experiences from the Best Firms in India," Vision, , vol. 24(2), pages 171-183, June.
    13. Christian Voegtlin & Michelle Greenwood, 2016. "Corporate social responsibility and human resource management: A systematic review and conceptual analysis," Post-Print hal-01481479, HAL.
    14. Mingqiong Zhang & David Fan & Cherrie Zhu, 2014. "High-Performance Work Systems, Corporate Social Performance and Employee Outcomes: Exploring the Missing Links," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 120(3), pages 423-435, March.
    15. Isabelle Huault & Dan Kärreman & Véronique Perret & André Spicer, 2017. "Introduction to the special issue The evolving debate about critical performativity," Post-Print hal-04053328, HAL.
    16. Michelle Greenwood, 2013. "Ethical Analyses of HRM: A Review and Research Agenda," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 114(2), pages 355-366, May.
    17. Carl Rhodes & Geraint Harvey, 2012. "Agonism and the Possibilities of Ethics for HRM," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 111(1), pages 49-59, November.
    18. Eline Jammaers, 2023. "Theorizing Discursive Resistance to Organizational Ethics of Care Through a Multi-stakeholder Perspective on Disability Inclusion Practices," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 183(2), pages 333-345, March.
    19. Vakkayil, Jacob & Torre, Edoardo Della & Giangreco, Antonio, 2017. "“It's not how it looks!” Exploring managerial perspectives on employee wellbeing," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 548-562.
    20. Jan Willem Nuis & Pascale Peters & Rob Blomme & Henk Kievit, 2021. "Dialogues in Sustainable HRM: Examining and Positioning Intended and Continuous Dialogue in Sustainable HRM Using a Complexity Thinking Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-20, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jek:journl:v:3:y:2015:i:1:p:32-45. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Aleksandr Kljucnikov (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vsposcz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.