IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jas/jasssj/2021-57-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

ReMoTe-S. Residential Mobility of Tenants in Switzerland: An Agent-Based Model

Author

Abstract

Sustainable housing is a key priority for Switzerland. To provide both environmentally and socio-culturally sustainable housing, Swiss property owners need to navigate the complex and context-specific system that articulates the match between households’ preferences and the dwellings available to them-i.e. residential mobility. In response to this need, this paper outlines ReMoTe-S, an agent-based model of tenants’ residential mobility in Switzerland. The model design is based on empirical research conducted with the tenants of three multifamily housing providers. It accounts for the life course of dwellings and households, during which the latter attempt to maximise their satisfaction, which is calculated as the correspondence between their desired housing functions (e.g. a status symbol) and the functions of dwellings. To illustrate the model’s potential uses, we explore the sensitivity of its outputs to changes in dwellings’ and buildings’ qualitative and quantitative features by looking at two key indicators of housing sustainability: floor space per capita and vacancy rate. We firstly observe that a supply dominated by medium-to-large dwellings and the application of less strict occupancy rules can result in housing underoccupancy. Secondly, it emerges that certain combinations of housing features engender a lower vacancy rate inasmuch as they more successfully generate housing functions. We conclude that by enabling housing providers to explore the complex human-environment interactions of the housing system, ReMoTe-S can be used to inform a sustainable management of housing stock.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Pagani & Francesco Ballestrazzi & Emanuele Massaro & Claudia R. Binder, 2022. "ReMoTe-S. Residential Mobility of Tenants in Switzerland: An Agent-Based Model," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 25(2), pages 1-4.
  • Handle: RePEc:jas:jasssj:2021-57-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.jasss.org/25/2/4/4.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. William A. V. Clark & William Lisowski, 2017. "Decisions to move and decisions to stay: life course events and mobility outcomes," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(5), pages 547-565, July.
    2. Jule Thober & Birgit Müller & Jürgen Groeneveld & Volker Grimm, 2017. "Agent-Based Modelling of Social-Ecological Systems: Achievements, Challenges, and a Way Forward," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 20(2), pages 1-8.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bourceret, Amélie & Accatino, Francesco & Robert, Corinne, 2024. "A modeling framework of a territorial socio-ecosystem to study the trajectories of change in agricultural phytosanitary practices," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 494(C).
    2. George Van Voorn & Geerten Hengeveld & Jan Verhagen, 2020. "An agent based model representation to assess resilience and efficiency of food supply chains," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-27, November.
    3. RÅ«ta UbareviÄ ienÄ— & Kadi Kalm & Maarten van Ham & Tautvydas Žinys & Jaak Kliimask & Tiit Tammaru, 2024. "Residential mobility and new forms of spatial inequality in the settlement system: A comparative study of Estonia and Lithuania," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 51(7), pages 1666-1688, September.
    4. Dwayne Marshall Baker, 2024. "Burden or benefit: Is retail marijuana facility siting influenced by LULU- or gentrification-related neighbourhood characteristics?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(6), pages 1049-1070, May.
    5. Alves d'Acampora, Bárbara Heliodora & Maraschin, Clarice & Taufemback, Cleiton Guollo, 2023. "Landscape ecology and urban spatial configuration: Exploring a methodological relationship. Application in Pelotas, Brazil," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 486(C).
    6. Robert Huber & Hang Xiong & Kevin Keller & Robert Finger, 2022. "Bridging behavioural factors and standard bio‐economic modelling in an agent‐based modelling framework," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(1), pages 35-63, February.
    7. Esther Reith & Elizabeth Gosling & Thomas Knoke & Carola Paul, 2020. "How Much Agroforestry Is Needed to Achieve Multifunctional Landscapes at the Forest Frontier?—Coupling Expert Opinion with Robust Goal Programming," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-27, July.
    8. Tim Winke, 2021. "Housing affordability sets us apart: The effect of rising housing prices on relocation behaviour," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(12), pages 2389-2404, September.
    9. Karel Mls & Milan Kořínek & Kamila Štekerová & Petr Tučník & Vladimír Bureš & Pavel Čech & Martina Husáková & Peter Mikulecký & Tomáš Nacházel & Daniela Ponce & Marek Zanker & František Babič & Ioanna, 2023. "Agent-based models of human response to natural hazards: systematic review of tsunami evacuation," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 115(3), pages 1887-1908, February.
    10. Aashis Joshi & Emile Chappin & Neelke Doorn, 2021. "Does Distributive Justice Improve Welfare Outcomes in Climate Adaptation? An Exploration Using an Agent-Based Model of a Stylized Social–Environmental System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-23, November.
    11. Troost, Christian & Huber, Robert & Bell, Andrew R. & van Delden, Hedwig & Filatova, Tatiana & Le, Quang Bao & Lippe, Melvin & Niamir, Leila & Polhill, J. Gareth & Sun, Zhanli & Berger, Thomas, 2023. "How to keep it adequate: A protocol for ensuring validity in agent-based simulation," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 159, pages 1-21.
    12. Li, Jiang-Cheng & Tao, Chen & Li, Hai-Feng, 2022. "Dynamic forecasting performance and liquidity evaluation of financial market by Econophysics and Bayesian methods," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 588(C).
    13. Radosavljevic, Sonja & Sanga, Udita & Schlüter, Maja, 2024. "Navigating simplicity and complexity of social-ecological systems through a dialogue between dynamical systems and agent-based models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 495(C).
    14. An, Li & Grimm, Volker & Sullivan, Abigail & Turner II, B.L. & Malleson, Nicolas & Heppenstall, Alison & Vincenot, Christian & Robinson, Derek & Ye, Xinyue & Liu, Jianguo & Lindkvist, Emilie & Tang, W, 2021. "Challenges, tasks, and opportunities in modeling agent-based complex systems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 457(C).
    15. repec:plo:pone00:0222949 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Meike Will & Jürgen Groeneveld & Karin Frank & Birgit Müller, 2021. "Informal risk-sharing between smallholders may be threatened by formal insurance: Lessons from a stylized agent-based model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-18, March.
    17. Bialozyt, Ronald B. & Roß-Nickoll, Martina & Ottermanns, Richard & Jetzkowitz, Jens, 2025. "The different ways to operationalise the social in applied models and simulations of sustainability science: A contribution for the enhancement of good modelling practices," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 500(C).
    18. Will, Meike & Groeneveld, Jürgen & Lenel, Friederike & Frank, Karin & Müller, Birgit, 2023. "Determinants of Household Vulnerability in Networks with Formal Insurance and Informal Risk-Sharing," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    19. Lisa Huber & Nico Bahro & Georg Leitinger & Ulrike Tappeiner & Ulrich Strasser, 2019. "Agent-Based Modelling of a Coupled Water Demand and Supply System at the Catchment Scale," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-15, November.
    20. Eleftheria Kontou & Noreen McDonald, 2021. "Associating ridesourcing with road safety outcomes: Insights from Austin, Texas," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-18, March.
    21. Mostafa Shaaban & Carmen Schwartz & Joseph Macpherson & Annette Piorr, 2021. "A Conceptual Model Framework for Mapping, Analyzing and Managing Supply–Demand Mismatches of Ecosystem Services in Agricultural Landscapes," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-19, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jas:jasssj:2021-57-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Francesco Renzini (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.