IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ortrsc/v52y2018i5p1035-1058.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Stochastic Container Relocation Problem

Author

Listed:
  • V. Galle

    (Operations Research Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142)

  • V. H. Manshadi

    (Yale School of Management, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06511)

  • S. Borjian Boroujeni

    (Operations Research Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142)

  • C. Barnhart

    (Operations Research Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142; Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142)

  • P. Jaillet

    (Operations Research Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142; Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142)

Abstract

The container relocation problem (CRP) is concerned with finding a sequence of moves of containers that minimizes the number of relocations needed to retrieve all containers, while respecting a given order of retrieval. However, the assumption of knowing the full retrieval order of containers is particularly unrealistic in real operations. This paper studies the stochastic CRP, which relaxes this assumption. A new multistage stochastic model, called the batch model , is introduced, motivated, and compared with an existing model (the online model ). The two main contributions are an optimal algorithm called Pruning-Best-First-Search (PBFS) and a randomized approximate algorithm called PBFS-Approximate with a bounded average error. Both algorithms, applicable in the batch and online models, are based on a new family of lower bounds for which we show some theoretical properties. Moreover, we introduce two new heuristics outperforming the best existing heuristics. Algorithms, bounds, and heuristics are tested in an extensive computational section. Finally, based on strong computational evidence, we conjecture the optimality of the “leveling” heuristic in a special “no information” case, where, at any retrieval stage, any of the remaining containers is equally likely to be retrieved next.

Suggested Citation

  • V. Galle & V. H. Manshadi & S. Borjian Boroujeni & C. Barnhart & P. Jaillet, 2018. "The Stochastic Container Relocation Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(5), pages 1035-1058, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ortrsc:v:52:y:2018:i:5:p:1035-1058
    DOI: 10.1287/trsc.2018.0828
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2018.0828
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/trsc.2018.0828?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lehnfeld, Jana & Knust, Sigrid, 2014. "Loading, unloading and premarshalling of stacks in storage areas: Survey and classification," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(2), pages 297-312.
    2. Ku, Dusan & Arthanari, Tiru S., 2016. "Container relocation problem with time windows for container departure," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(3), pages 1031-1039.
    3. Caserta, Marco & Schwarze, Silvia & Voß, Stefan, 2012. "A mathematical formulation and complexity considerations for the blocks relocation problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 219(1), pages 96-104.
    4. Zehendner, Elisabeth & Caserta, Marco & Feillet, Dominique & Schwarze, Silvia & Voß, Stefan, 2015. "An improved mathematical formulation for the blocks relocation problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(2), pages 415-422.
    5. Petering, Matthew E.H. & Hussein, Mazen I., 2013. "A new mixed integer program and extended look-ahead heuristic algorithm for the block relocation problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 231(1), pages 120-130.
    6. Katta G. Murty & Yat-wah Wan & Jiyin Liu & Mitchell M. Tseng & Edmond Leung & Kam-Keung Lai & Herman W. C. Chiu, 2005. "Hongkong International Terminals Gains Elastic Capacity Using a Data-Intensive Decision-Support System," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 35(1), pages 61-75, February.
    7. M. Hakan Akyüz & Chung‐Yee Lee, 2014. "A mathematical formulation and efficient heuristics for the dynamic container relocation problem," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 61(2), pages 101-118, March.
    8. Zhao, Wenjuan & Goodchild, Anne V., 2010. "The impact of truck arrival information on container terminal rehandling," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 327-343, May.
    9. Zehendner, Elisabeth & Feillet, Dominique & Jaillet, Patrick, 2017. "An algorithm with performance guarantee for the Online Container Relocation Problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(1), pages 48-62.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zweers, Bernard G. & Bhulai, Sandjai & van der Mei, Rob D., 2020. "Optimizing pre-processing and relocation moves in the Stochastic Container Relocation Problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(3), pages 954-971.
    2. Maniezzo, Vittorio & Boschetti, Marco A. & Gutjahr, Walter J., 2021. "Stochastic premarshalling of block stacking warehouses," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    3. Azab, Ahmed & Morita, Hiroshi, 2022. "The block relocation problem with appointment scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(2), pages 680-694.
    4. Feng, Yuanjun & Song, Dong-Ping & Li, Dong, 2022. "Smart stacking for import containers using customer information at automated container terminals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(2), pages 502-522.
    5. Jin, Bo & Tanaka, Shunji, 2023. "An exact algorithm for the unrestricted container relocation problem with new lower bounds and dominance rules," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 304(2), pages 494-514.
    6. Boschma, René & Mes, Martijn R.K. & de Vries, Leon R., 2023. "Approximate dynamic programming for container stacking," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(1), pages 328-342.
    7. Azab, Ahmed & Morita, Hiroshi, 2022. "Coordinating truck appointments with container relocations and retrievals in container terminals under partial appointments information," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    8. Feng, Yuanjun & Song, Dong-Ping & Li, Dong & Zeng, Qingcheng, 2020. "The stochastic container relocation problem with flexible service policies," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 116-163.
    9. Feng, Yuanjun & Song, Dong-Ping & Li, Dong & Xie, Ying, 2022. "Service fairness and value of customer information for the stochastic container relocation problem under flexible service policy," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Feng, Yuanjun & Song, Dong-Ping & Li, Dong & Zeng, Qingcheng, 2020. "The stochastic container relocation problem with flexible service policies," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 116-163.
    2. Jovanovic, Raka & Tuba, Milan & Voß, Stefan, 2019. "An efficient ant colony optimization algorithm for the blocks relocation problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(1), pages 78-90.
    3. Jin, Bo & Tanaka, Shunji, 2023. "An exact algorithm for the unrestricted container relocation problem with new lower bounds and dominance rules," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 304(2), pages 494-514.
    4. Gharehgozli, Amir & Zaerpour, Nima, 2018. "Stacking outbound barge containers in an automated deep-sea terminal," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(3), pages 977-995.
    5. Feng, Yuanjun & Song, Dong-Ping & Li, Dong & Xie, Ying, 2022. "Service fairness and value of customer information for the stochastic container relocation problem under flexible service policy," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    6. Zehendner, Elisabeth & Feillet, Dominique & Jaillet, Patrick, 2017. "An algorithm with performance guarantee for the Online Container Relocation Problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(1), pages 48-62.
    7. Raka Jovanovic & Shunji Tanaka & Tatsushi Nishi & Stefan Voß, 2019. "A GRASP approach for solving the Blocks Relocation Problem with Stowage Plan," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 702-729, September.
    8. Zweers, Bernard G. & Bhulai, Sandjai & van der Mei, Rob D., 2020. "Optimizing pre-processing and relocation moves in the Stochastic Container Relocation Problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(3), pages 954-971.
    9. Huiling Zhu & Mingjun Ji & Wenwen Guo & Qingbin Wang & Yongzhi Yang, 2019. "Mathematical formulation and heuristic algorithm for the block relocation and loading problem," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 66(4), pages 333-351, June.
    10. Ting, Ching-Jung & Wu, Kun-Chih, 2017. "Optimizing container relocation operations at container yards with beam search," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 17-31.
    11. Azab, Ahmed & Morita, Hiroshi, 2022. "Coordinating truck appointments with container relocations and retrievals in container terminals under partial appointments information," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    12. Azab, Ahmed & Morita, Hiroshi, 2022. "The block relocation problem with appointment scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(2), pages 680-694.
    13. Boschma, René & Mes, Martijn R.K. & de Vries, Leon R., 2023. "Approximate dynamic programming for container stacking," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(1), pages 328-342.
    14. Kap Hwan Kim & Sanghyuk Yi, 2021. "Utilizing information sources to reduce relocation of inbound containers," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 23(4), pages 726-749, December.
    15. Galle, Virgile & Barnhart, Cynthia & Jaillet, Patrick, 2018. "A new binary formulation of the restricted Container Relocation Problem based on a binary encoding of configurations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(2), pages 467-477.
    16. Huiling Zhu, 2022. "Integrated Containership Stowage Planning: A Methodology for Coordinating Containership Stowage Plan and Terminal Yard Operations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-18, October.
    17. Tanaka, Shunji & Voß, Stefan, 2019. "An exact algorithm for the block relocation problem with a stowage plan," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(3), pages 767-781.
    18. Andresson Silva Firmino & Ricardo Martins Abreu Silva & Valéria Cesário Times, 2019. "A reactive GRASP metaheuristic for the container retrieval problem to reduce crane’s working time," Journal of Heuristics, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 141-173, April.
    19. Boge, Sven & Goerigk, Marc & Knust, Sigrid, 2020. "Robust optimization for premarshalling with uncertain priority classes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(1), pages 191-210.
    20. Juan P. Cavada & Cristián E. Cortés & Pablo A. Rey, 2023. "Comparing allocation and relocation policies at a logistics service container terminal: a discrete-event simulation approach," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 31(4), pages 1281-1316, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ortrsc:v:52:y:2018:i:5:p:1035-1058. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.