IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/cejnor/v31y2023i4d10.1007_s10100-023-00857-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing allocation and relocation policies at a logistics service container terminal: a discrete-event simulation approach

Author

Listed:
  • Juan P. Cavada

    (Universidad del Desarrollo)

  • Cristián E. Cortés

    (Universidad de Chile
    Instituto Sistemas Complejos de Ingeniería (ISCI))

  • Pablo A. Rey

    (Universidad Tecnológica Metropolitana)

Abstract

This research is focused on the analysis of a container terminal common in industrial zones in urban areas, called the logistic services container terminal (LSCT), defined as a small to medium size inland terminal with no intermodal facilities. The main function of an LSCT is to provide services to a hinterland market. The material handling equipment used is limited to reach stacker cranes and front loaders, and ground transportation in and out is performed using trucks exclusively. Moreover, there are many operations related to servicing customers in special service areas within the yard. In this research, we explicitly recognize the limitations and features associated with the operations within LSCT yards, which means that the problems and solutions must be conceived and addressed in a very unique way, considering that services have to be coordinated with the strategies proposed for managing the movement of containers in and out. This paper characterizes the different aspects present in the treatment of an LSCT and proposes an adapted version of three known greedy decision rules for determining the location for an arriving container. We evaluate the performances of these rules using a discrete-event simulator: the min-max rule outperforms the other tested rules. These rules are also extended to consider the cost of moving relocating containers. The results show that using cost-aware rules while increasing the expected number of relocations reduces the total expected cost significantly.

Suggested Citation

  • Juan P. Cavada & Cristián E. Cortés & Pablo A. Rey, 2023. "Comparing allocation and relocation policies at a logistics service container terminal: a discrete-event simulation approach," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 31(4), pages 1281-1316, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:cejnor:v:31:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s10100-023-00857-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s10100-023-00857-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10100-023-00857-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10100-023-00857-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Petering, Matthew E.H. & Hussein, Mazen I., 2013. "A new mixed integer program and extended look-ahead heuristic algorithm for the block relocation problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 231(1), pages 120-130.
    2. Boysen, Nils & Emde, Simon, 2016. "The parallel stack loading problem to minimize blockages," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 79433, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    3. M. Hakan Akyüz & Chung‐Yee Lee, 2014. "A mathematical formulation and efficient heuristics for the dynamic container relocation problem," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 61(2), pages 101-118, March.
    4. Rodrigue, Jean-Paul & Debrie, Jean & Fremont, Antoine & Gouvernal, Elisabeth, 2010. "Functions and actors of inland ports: European and North American dynamics," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 519-529.
    5. Lehnfeld, Jana & Knust, Sigrid, 2014. "Loading, unloading and premarshalling of stacks in storage areas: Survey and classification," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(2), pages 297-312.
    6. Carlo, Héctor J. & Vis, Iris F.A. & Roodbergen, Kees Jan, 2014. "Storage yard operations in container terminals: Literature overview, trends, and research directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 412-430.
    7. Caserta, Marco & Schwarze, Silvia & Voß, Stefan, 2012. "A mathematical formulation and complexity considerations for the blocks relocation problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 219(1), pages 96-104.
    8. Kim, Kap Hwan & Park, Young Man & Ryu, Kwang-Ryul, 2000. "Deriving decision rules to locate export containers in container yards," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(1), pages 89-101, July.
    9. Rommert Dekker & Patrick Voogd & Eelco Asperen, 2007. "Advanced methods for container stacking," Springer Books, in: Kap Hwan Kim & Hans-Otto Günther (ed.), Container Terminals and Cargo Systems, pages 131-154, Springer.
    10. Lee, Byung Kwon & Kim, Kap Hwan, 2010. "Optimizing the block size in container yards," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 120-135, January.
    11. Jang, Dong-Won & Kim, Se Won & Kim, Kap Hwan, 2013. "The optimization of mixed block stacking requiring relocations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(2), pages 256-262.
    12. Kim, Kap Hwan & Park, Kang Tae, 2003. "A note on a dynamic space-allocation method for outbound containers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(1), pages 92-101, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gharehgozli, Amir & Zaerpour, Nima, 2018. "Stacking outbound barge containers in an automated deep-sea terminal," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(3), pages 977-995.
    2. Huiling Zhu & Mingjun Ji & Wenwen Guo & Qingbin Wang & Yongzhi Yang, 2019. "Mathematical formulation and heuristic algorithm for the block relocation and loading problem," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 66(4), pages 333-351, June.
    3. Gharehgozli, Amir & Yu, Yugang & de Koster, René & Du, Shaofu, 2019. "Sequencing storage and retrieval requests in a container block with multiple open locations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 261-284.
    4. Lehnfeld, Jana & Knust, Sigrid, 2014. "Loading, unloading and premarshalling of stacks in storage areas: Survey and classification," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(2), pages 297-312.
    5. Feng, Yuanjun & Song, Dong-Ping & Li, Dong & Zeng, Qingcheng, 2020. "The stochastic container relocation problem with flexible service policies," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 116-163.
    6. Ting, Ching-Jung & Wu, Kun-Chih, 2017. "Optimizing container relocation operations at container yards with beam search," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 17-31.
    7. Jin, Bo & Tanaka, Shunji, 2023. "An exact algorithm for the unrestricted container relocation problem with new lower bounds and dominance rules," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 304(2), pages 494-514.
    8. de Melo da Silva, Marcos & Toulouse, Sophie & Wolfler Calvo, Roberto, 2018. "A new effective unified model for solving the Pre-marshalling and Block Relocation Problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(1), pages 40-56.
    9. Gharehgozli, A.H. & Roy, D. & de Koster, M.B.M., 2014. "Sea Container Terminals," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2014-009-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    10. Ruiyou Zhang & Shixin Liu & Herbert Kopfer, 2016. "Tree search procedures for the blocks relocation problem with batch moves," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 397-424, September.
    11. Feng, Yuanjun & Song, Dong-Ping & Li, Dong, 2022. "Smart stacking for import containers using customer information at automated container terminals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(2), pages 502-522.
    12. Boschma, René & Mes, Martijn R.K. & de Vries, Leon R., 2023. "Approximate dynamic programming for container stacking," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(1), pages 328-342.
    13. Andresson Silva Firmino & Ricardo Martins Abreu Silva & Valéria Cesário Times, 2019. "A reactive GRASP metaheuristic for the container retrieval problem to reduce crane’s working time," Journal of Heuristics, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 141-173, April.
    14. Galle, Virgile & Barnhart, Cynthia & Jaillet, Patrick, 2018. "A new binary formulation of the restricted Container Relocation Problem based on a binary encoding of configurations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(2), pages 467-477.
    15. Galle, Virgile & Barnhart, Cynthia & Jaillet, Patrick, 2018. "Yard Crane Scheduling for container storage, retrieval, and relocation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(1), pages 288-316.
    16. Jiang, Xin Jia & Jin, Jian Gang, 2017. "A branch-and-price method for integrated yard crane deployment and container allocation in transshipment yards," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 62-75.
    17. Zweers, Bernard G. & Bhulai, Sandjai & van der Mei, Rob D., 2020. "Optimizing pre-processing and relocation moves in the Stochastic Container Relocation Problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(3), pages 954-971.
    18. Ji, Mingjun & Guo, Wenwen & Zhu, Huiling & Yang, Yongzhi, 2015. "Optimization of loading sequence and rehandling strategy for multi-quay crane operations in container terminals," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1-19.
    19. V. Galle & V. H. Manshadi & S. Borjian Boroujeni & C. Barnhart & P. Jaillet, 2018. "The Stochastic Container Relocation Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(5), pages 1035-1058, October.
    20. Zehendner, Elisabeth & Feillet, Dominique & Jaillet, Patrick, 2017. "An algorithm with performance guarantee for the Online Container Relocation Problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(1), pages 48-62.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:cejnor:v:31:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s10100-023-00857-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.