IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/oropre/v73y2025i2p738-751.html

EFX: A Simpler Approach and an (Almost) Optimal Guarantee via Rainbow Cycle Number

Author

Listed:
  • Hannaneh Akrami

    (Max Planck Institute for Informatics and Universität des Saarlandes, 66123 Saarbrücken, Germany)

  • Noga Alon

    (Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544)

  • Bhaskar Ray Chaudhury

    (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801)

  • Jugal Garg

    (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801)

  • Kurt Mehlhorn

    (Max Planck Institute for Informatics and Universität des Saarlandes, 66123 Saarbrücken, Germany)

  • Ruta Mehta

    (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801)

Abstract

The existence of envy-freeness up to any good (EFX) allocations is a fundamental open problem in discrete fair division. The goal is to determine the existence of an allocation of a set of indivisible goods among n agents for which no agent envies another, following the removal of any single good from the other agent’s bundle. Because the general problem has been elusive, progress is made on two fronts: (i) proving existence when n is small and (ii) proving the existence of relaxations of EFX. In this paper, we improve and simplify the state-of-the-art results on both fronts with new techniques. For the case of three agents, the existence of EFX was first shown with additive valuations and then extended to nice-cancelable valuations. As our first main result, we simplify and improve this result by showing the existence of EFX allocations when two of the agents have general monotone valuations and one has a maximin share (MMS)–feasible valuation (a strict generalization of nice-cancelable valuation functions). Our approach is significantly simpler than the previous ones, and it also avoids using the standard concepts of envy graph and champion graph and may find use in other fair-division problems. Second, we consider approximate EFX allocations with few unallocated goods (charity). Through a promising new method using a problem in extremal combinatorics called rainbow cycle number (RCN), the existence of ( 1 − ϵ ) -EFX allocation with O ( ( n / ϵ ) 4 5 ) charity was established. This is done by upper bounding the RCN by O ( d 4 ) in d -dimension. They conjecture RCN to be O ( d ) . We almost settle this conjecture by improving the upper bound to O ( d log d ) and thereby get (almost) optimal charity of O ˜ ( ( n / ϵ ) 1 2 ) that is possible through this method. Our technique is much simpler than the previous ones and is based on the probabilistic method.

Suggested Citation

  • Hannaneh Akrami & Noga Alon & Bhaskar Ray Chaudhury & Jugal Garg & Kurt Mehlhorn & Ruta Mehta, 2025. "EFX: A Simpler Approach and an (Almost) Optimal Guarantee via Rainbow Cycle Number," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 73(2), pages 738-751, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:73:y:2025:i:2:p:738-751
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.2023.0433
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.2023.0433
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.2023.0433?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Steven J. Brams & D. Marc Kilgour & Christian Klamler, 2017. "Maximin Envy-Free Division of Indivisible Items," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 115-131, January.
    2. Hervé Moulin, 2019. "Fair Division in the Internet Age," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 11(1), pages 407-441, August.
    3. Eric Budish, 2011. "The Combinatorial Assignment Problem: Approximate Competitive Equilibrium from Equal Incomes," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 119(6), pages 1061-1103.
    4. Eric Budish & Estelle Cantillon, 2012. "The Multi-unit Assignment Problem: Theory and Evidence from Course Allocation at Harvard," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 102(5), pages 2237-2271, August.
    5. John Winsor Pratt & Richard Jay Zeckhauser, 1990. "The Fair and Efficient Division of the Winsor Family Silver," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(11), pages 1293-1301, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tzeh Yuan Neoh & Nicholas Teh, 2025. "Understanding EFX Allocations: Counting and Variants," Papers 2504.03951, arXiv.org.
    2. Bhaskar Ray Chaudhury & Jugal Garg & Peter McGlaughlin & Ruta Mehta, 2023. "A Complementary Pivot Algorithm for Competitive Allocation of a Mixed Manna," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 48(3), pages 1630-1656, August.
    3. Bhaskar Ray Chaudhury & Jugal Garg & Kurt Mehlhorn & Ruta Mehta & Pranabendu Misra, 2024. "Improving Envy Freeness up to Any Good Guarantees Through Rainbow Cycle Number," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 49(4), pages 2323-2340, November.
    4. Eugene Lim & Tzeh Yuan Neoh & Nicholas Teh, 2026. "The Cost of EFX: Generalized-Mean Welfare and Complexity Dichotomies with Few Surplus Items," Papers 2601.12849, arXiv.org.
    5. Gian Caspari, 2026. "Booster draft mechanisms for multi-object assignment," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 55(1), pages 1-20, June.
    6. Hadi Hosseini & Zhiyi Huang & Ayumi Igarashi & Nisarg Shah, 2022. "Class Fairness in Online Matching," Papers 2203.03751, arXiv.org.
    7. Anna Bogomolnaia & Herve Moulin & Fedor Sandomirskiy & Elena Yanovskaya, 2016. "Dividing Goods or Bads Under Additive Utilities," HSE Working papers WP BRP 147/EC/2016, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    8. Moshe Babaioff & Noam Nisan & Inbal Talgam-Cohen, 2021. "Competitive Equilibrium with Indivisible Goods and Generic Budgets," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(1), pages 382-403, February.
    9. Anna Bogomolnaia & Hervé Moulin & Fedor Sandomirskiy & Elena Yanovskaya, 2017. "Competitive Division of a Mixed Manna," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 85(6), pages 1847-1871, November.
    10. Aygün, Orhan & Turhan, Bertan, 2021. "How to De-reserve Reserves," ISU General Staff Papers 202103100800001123, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    11. Miralles, Antonio & Pycia, Marek, 2021. "Foundations of pseudomarkets: Walrasian equilibria for discrete resources," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    12. Eric Budish & Gérard P. Cachon & Judd B. Kessler & Abraham Othman, 2017. "Course Match: A Large-Scale Implementation of Approximate Competitive Equilibrium from Equal Incomes for Combinatorial Allocation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(2), pages 314-336, April.
    13. Anna Bogomolnaia & Hervé Moulin, 2023. "Guarantees in Fair Division: General or Monotone Preferences," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 48(1), pages 160-176, February.
    14. Dur, Umut Mert & Wiseman, Thomas, 2019. "School choice with neighbors," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 101-109.
    15. Romero-Medina, Antonio & Triossi, Matteo, 2024. "Strategic priority-based course allocation," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    16. Kojima, Fuhito, 2013. "Efficient resource allocation under multi-unit demand," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 1-14.
    17. Eric Budish & Judd B. Kessler, 2022. "Can Market Participants Report Their Preferences Accurately (Enough)?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(2), pages 1107-1130, February.
    18. Ortega, Josué, 2020. "Multi-unit assignment under dichotomous preferences," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 15-24.
    19. Shende, Priyanka & Purohit, Manish, 2023. "Strategy-proof and envy-free mechanisms for house allocation," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    20. Antonio Romero-Medina & Matteo Triossi, 2018. "Centralized Course Allocation," Documentos de Trabajo 340, Centro de Economía Aplicada, Universidad de Chile.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:73:y:2025:i:2:p:738-751. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.