IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/oropre/v72y2024i4p1400-1420.html

Treatment Planning for Victims with Heterogeneous Time Sensitivities in Mass Casualty Incidents

Author

Listed:
  • Yunting Shi

    (Antai College of Economics and Management, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China)

  • Nan Liu

    (Carroll School of Management, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts 02467)

  • Guohua Wan

    (Antai College of Economics and Management, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China)

Abstract

The current emergency response guidelines suggest giving priority of treatment to those victims whose initial health conditions are more critical. Although this makes intuitive sense, it does not consider potential deterioration of less critical victims. Deterioration may lead to longer treatment time and irrecoverable health damage, but could be avoided if these victims were to receive care in time. Informed by a unique timestamps data set of surgeries carried out in a field hospital set up in response to a large-scale earthquake, we develop scheduling models to aid treatment planning for mass casualty incidents (MCIs). A distinguishing feature of our modeling framework is to simultaneously consider victim health deterioration and wait-dependent service times in making decisions. We identify conditions under which victims with a less critical initial condition have higher or lower priority than their counterparts in an optimal schedule—the priority order depends on victim deterioration trajectories and the resource (i.e., treatment time) availability. A counterfactual analysis based on our data shows that adopting our model would significantly reduce the surgical makespan and the total numbers of overdue and deteriorated victims compared with using the then-implemented treatment plan; dynamic adjustment of treatment plans (if a second batch of victims arrive) and care coordination among surgical teams could further improve operational efficiency and health outcomes. By demonstrating the value of adopting data-driven approaches in MCI response, our research holds strong potentials to improve emergency response and to inform its policy making.

Suggested Citation

  • Yunting Shi & Nan Liu & Guohua Wan, 2024. "Treatment Planning for Victims with Heterogeneous Time Sensitivities in Mass Casualty Incidents," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 72(4), pages 1400-1420, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:72:y:2024:i:4:p:1400-1420
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.2021.0310
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.2021.0310
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.2021.0310?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stanisław Gawiejnowicz, 2020. "A review of four decades of time-dependent scheduling: main results, new topics, and open problems," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 3-47, February.
    2. Ahmadi-Javid, Amir & Jalali, Zahra & Klassen, Kenneth J, 2017. "Outpatient appointment systems in healthcare: A review of optimization studies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(1), pages 3-34.
    3. Cheng, T. C. E. & Ding, Q. & Lin, B. M. T., 2004. "A concise survey of scheduling with time-dependent processing times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(1), pages 1-13, January.
    4. Evin Uzun Jacobson & Nilay Tanık Argon & Serhan Ziya, 2012. "Priority Assignment in Emergency Response," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(4), pages 813-832, August.
    5. B Alidaee & N K Womer, 1999. "Scheduling with time dependent processing times: Review and extensions," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 50(7), pages 711-720, July.
    6. Sarang Deo & Seyed Iravani & Tingting Jiang & Karen Smilowitz & Stephen Samuelson, 2013. "Improving Health Outcomes Through Better Capacity Allocation in a Community-Based Chronic Care Model," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(6), pages 1277-1294, December.
    7. Joseph Y.-T. Leung & Michael Pinedo & Guohua Wan, 2010. "Competitive Two-Agent Scheduling and Its Applications," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(2), pages 458-469, April.
    8. Carri W. Chan & Vivek F. Farias & Gabriel J. Escobar, 2017. "The Impact of Delays on Service Times in the Intensive Care Unit," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(7), pages 2049-2072, July.
    9. Sid Browne & Uri Yechiali, 1990. "Scheduling Deteriorating Jobs on a Single Processor," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 38(3), pages 495-498, June.
    10. Zhankun Sun & Nilay Tan?k Argon & Serhan Ziya, 2018. "Patient Triage and Prioritization Under Austere Conditions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(10), pages 4471-4489, October.
    11. Richard C. Larson & Michael D. Metzger & Michael F. Cahn, 2006. "Responding to Emergencies: Lessons Learned and the Need for Analysis," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 36(6), pages 486-501, December.
    12. Alex F. Mills & Nilay Tanık Argon & Serhan Ziya, 2013. "Resource-Based Patient Prioritization in Mass-Casualty Incidents," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 15(3), pages 361-377, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gawiejnowicz, Stanisław, 2026. "Theory and methodology of time-dependent scheduling: Past, present and future," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 329(3), pages 719-746.
    2. Cheng He & Joseph Y.-T. Leung, 2017. "Two-agent scheduling of time-dependent jobs," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 362-377, August.
    3. Delorme, Maxence & Iori, Manuel & Mendes, Nilson F.M., 2021. "Solution methods for scheduling problems with sequence-dependent deterioration and maintenance events," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(3), pages 823-837.
    4. Noa Zychlinski & Gal Mendelson & Andrew Daw, 2026. "Optimal call-in policies under travel-induced risk: application to hybrid hospitalization," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 110(1), pages 1-47, March.
    5. Xing Chai & Wenhua Li & Hang Yuan & Libo Wang, 2022. "Online scheduling on a single machine with linear deteriorating processing times and delivery times," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 1900-1912, October.
    6. C-C He & C-C Wu & W-C Lee, 2009. "Branch-and-bound and weight-combination search algorithms for the total completion time problem with step-deteriorating jobs," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(12), pages 1759-1766, December.
    7. Wang, Ling & Sun, Lin-Yan & Sun, Lin-Hui & Wang, Ji-Bo, 2010. "On three-machine flow shop scheduling with deteriorating jobs," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(1), pages 185-189, May.
    8. Wu, Chin-Chia & Lee, Wen-Chiung, 2006. "Two-machine flowshop scheduling to minimize mean flow time under linear deterioration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(2), pages 572-584, October.
    9. T C E Cheng & L Kang & C T Ng, 2004. "Due-date assignment and single machine scheduling with deteriorating jobs," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 55(2), pages 198-203, February.
    10. Min Ji & Chou-Jung Hsu & Dar-Li Yang, 2013. "Single-machine scheduling with deteriorating jobs and aging effects under an optional maintenance activity consideration," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 437-447, October.
    11. Tinglong Dai & Sridhar Tayur, 2020. "OM Forum—Healthcare Operations Management: A Snapshot of Emerging Research," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(5), pages 869-887, September.
    12. C Lahlou & S Dauzère-Pérès, 2006. "Single-machine scheduling with time window-dependent processing times," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 57(2), pages 133-139, February.
    13. Helmut A. Sedding, 2020. "Scheduling jobs with a V-shaped time-dependent processing time," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 23(6), pages 751-768, December.
    14. J-B Wang & Z-Q Xia, 2006. "Flow shop scheduling problems with deteriorating jobs under dominating machines," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 57(2), pages 220-226, February.
    15. Ocetkiewicz, Krzysztof M., 2010. "A FPTAS for minimizing total completion time in a single machine time-dependent scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(2), pages 316-320, June.
    16. Shakeri, Shakib & Logendran, Rasaratnam, 2007. "A mathematical programming-based scheduling framework for multitasking environments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(1), pages 193-209, January.
    17. Dar-Li Yang & Wen-Hung Kuo, 2009. "Single-machine scheduling with both deterioration and learning effects," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 172(1), pages 315-327, November.
    18. Retsef Levi & Thomas Magnanti & Yaron Shaposhnik, 2019. "Scheduling with Testing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(2), pages 776-793, February.
    19. Hongfeng Wang & Min Huang & Junwei Wang, 2019. "An effective metaheuristic algorithm for flowshop scheduling with deteriorating jobs," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(7), pages 2733-2742, October.
    20. Farahani, Reza Zanjirani & Lotfi, M.M. & Baghaian, Atefe & Ruiz, Rubén & Rezapour, Shabnam, 2020. "Mass casualty management in disaster scene: A systematic review of OR&MS research in humanitarian operations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(3), pages 787-819.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:72:y:2024:i:4:p:1400-1420. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.