IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v24y2022i2p1241-1260.html

Data-Driven Sports Ticket Pricing for Multiple Sales Channels with Heterogeneous Customers

Author

Listed:
  • Hayri A. Arslan

    (Alvarez College of Business, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas 78249;)

  • Robert F. Easley

    (Mendoza College of Business, University of Notre Dame, South Bend, Indiana 46556;)

  • Ruxian Wang

    (Johns Hopkins Carey Business School, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21202;)

  • Övünç Yılmaz

    (Leeds School of Business, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 80309)

Abstract

Problem Definition : We develop a framework to study purchase behavior from distinct segments of heterogeneous customers and to optimize prices for different policies in a sports ticket market with multiple sales channels. Academic/Practical Relevance : Sports teams face challenges in maintaining or increasing ticket sales levels. With the growth of analytics, they aim to implement data-driven pricing techniques to improve gate revenues; however, they do not have state-of-the-art demand estimation and price optimization tools that take into account the range of valuations across different seat sections and opponent match-ups. Methodology : Partnering with a college football team, we develop a data-driven pricing tool which (1) segments customers in two sales channels, using transaction-level data and anonymous customer profiles; (2) explores the decision-making process of different customers within these segments using the Multinomial Logit and Mixed Multinomial Logit frameworks; and (3) computes optimal or near-optimal prices subject to some business constraints enforced by the team management. In addition, our method takes the sequential arrivals of customers and the capacity constraints of seat categories into account. Results : Our estimation results show that customers differ significantly in their sensitivities to price and distance to the field within each segment, in addition to the differences across segments. We also observe that customers become less likely to choose a seat category as its remaining inventory falls below a certain point. Managerial Implications : By analyzing different policies, we show that price optimization could increase revenue by as much as 7.6%. In addition, better categorization of games and further refinement of seat category differentiation and related pricing may help further boost this figure up to 11.9%.

Suggested Citation

  • Hayri A. Arslan & Robert F. Easley & Ruxian Wang & Övünç Yılmaz, 2022. "Data-Driven Sports Ticket Pricing for Multiple Sales Channels with Heterogeneous Customers," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 24(2), pages 1241-1260, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:24:y:2022:i:2:p:1241-1260
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2021.1005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.2021.1005
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2021.1005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ruxian Wang, 2018. "When Prospect Theory Meets Consumer Choice Models: Assortment and Pricing Management with Reference Prices," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 583-600, July.
    2. Daniel, Rascher & Chad, McEvoy & Mark, Nagel & Matt, Brown, 2007. "Variable Ticket Pricing in Major League Baseball," MPRA Paper 25803, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Hongmin Li & Scott Webster & Nicholas Mason & Karl Kempf, 2019. "Product-Line Pricing Under Discrete Mixed Multinomial Logit Demand," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 14-28, January.
    4. Pascal Courty & Mario Pagliero, 2012. "The Impact of Price Discrimination on Revenue: Evidence from the Concert Industry," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 94(1), pages 359-369, February.
    5. Joseph Jiaqi Xu & Peter S. Fader & Senthil Veeraraghavan, 2019. "Designing and Evaluating Dynamic Pricing Policies for Major League Baseball Tickets," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 121-138, January.
    6. Varian, Hal R., 1989. "Price discrimination," Handbook of Industrial Organization, in: R. Schmalensee & R. Willig (ed.), Handbook of Industrial Organization, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 10, pages 597-654, Elsevier.
    7. Daniel McFadden & Kenneth Train, 2000. "Mixed MNL models for discrete response," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(5), pages 447-470.
    8. Guang Li & Paat Rusmevichientong & Huseyin Topaloglu, 2015. "The d -Level Nested Logit Model: Assortment and Price Optimization Problems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(2), pages 325-342, April.
    9. Ruxian Wang & Zizhuo Wang, 2017. "Consumer Choice Models with Endogenous Network Effects," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(11), pages 3944-3960, November.
    10. Train,Kenneth E., 2009. "Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521747387, Enero-Abr.
    11. Crew, Michael A & Fernando, Chitru S & Kleindorfer, Paul R, 1995. "The Theory of Peak-Load Pricing: A Survey," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 8(3), pages 215-248, November.
    12. Jeongwen Chiang, 1991. "A Simultaneous Approach to the Whether, What and How Much to Buy Questions," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(4), pages 297-315.
    13. Woonghee Tim Huh & Hongmin Li, 2015. "Technical Note—Pricing Under the Nested Attraction Model with a Multistage Choice Structure," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(4), pages 840-850, August.
    14. Hongmin Li & Woonghee Tim Huh, 2011. "Pricing Multiple Products with the Multinomial Logit and Nested Logit Models: Concavity and Implications," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 13(4), pages 549-563, October.
    15. Necati Tereyağoğlu & Peter S. Fader & Senthil Veeraraghavan, 2018. "Multiattribute Loss Aversion and Reference Dependence: Evidence from the Performing Arts Industry," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(1), pages 421-436, January.
    16. Phillip Leslie, 2004. "Price Discrimination in Broadway Theater," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 35(3), pages 520-541, Autumn.
    17. Chenhao Du & William L. Cooper & Zizhuo Wang, 2016. "Optimal Pricing for a Multinomial Logit Choice Model with Network Effects," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(2), pages 441-455, April.
    18. Goker Aydin & Evan L. Porteus, 2008. "Joint Inventory and Pricing Decisions for an Assortment," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(5), pages 1247-1255, October.
    19. Awi Federgruen & Nan Yang, 2009. "Competition Under Generalized Attraction Models: Applications to Quality Competition Under Yield Uncertainty," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(12), pages 2028-2043, December.
    20. Gemma Berenguer & Pinar Keskinocak & J. George Shanthikumar & Jayashankar M. Swaminathan & Luk Van Wassenhove & Necati Tereyağoğlu & Peter S. Fader & Senthil Veeraraghavan, 2017. "Pricing Theater Seats: The Value of Price Commitment and Monotone Discounting," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 26(6), pages 1056-1075, June.
    21. Lakshman Krishnamurthi & S. P. Raj, 1988. "A Model of Brand Choice and Purchase Quantity Price Sensitivities," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 7(1), pages 1-20.
    22. Guillermo Gallego & Ruxian Wang, 2014. "Multiproduct Price Optimization and Competition Under the Nested Logit Model with Product-Differentiated Price Sensitivities," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(2), pages 450-461, April.
    23. Chloe Kim Glaeser & Marshall Fisher & Xuanming Su, 2019. "Optimal Retail Location: Empirical Methodology and Application to Practice," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 86-102, January.
    24. Makridakis, Spyros, 1993. "Accuracy measures: theoretical and practical concerns," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 9(4), pages 527-529, December.
    25. Stefanus Jasin & Sunil Kumar, 2012. "A Re-Solving Heuristic with Bounded Revenue Loss for Network Revenue Management with Customer Choice," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 37(2), pages 313-345, May.
    26. Pradeep K. Chintagunta, 1993. "Investigating Purchase Incidence, Brand Choice and Purchase Quantity Decisions of Households," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(2), pages 184-208.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ruxian Wang, 2022. "What Is the Impact of Nonrandomness on Random Choice Models?," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 24(1), pages 485-503, January.
    2. Hoang Giang Pham & Tien Mai, 2026. "Constrained Pricing under Finite Mixtures of Logit," Papers 2602.08119, arXiv.org.
    3. Woonghee T. Huh & Hongmin Li, 2023. "Product‐line pricing with dual objective of profit and consumer surplus," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(4), pages 1223-1242, April.
    4. Hongmin Li & Scott Webster & Nicholas Mason & Karl Kempf, 2019. "Product-Line Pricing Under Discrete Mixed Multinomial Logit Demand," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 14-28, January.
    5. Danny Segev, 2022. "Technical Note—Approximation Schemes for Capacity-Constrained Assortment Optimization Under the Nested Logit Model," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 70(5), pages 2820-2836, September.
    6. Hongmin Li & Scott Webster & Gwangjae Yu, 2020. "Product Design Under Multinomial Logit Choices: Optimization of Quality and Prices in an Evolving Product Line," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(5), pages 1011-1025, September.
    7. Ruben van de Geer & Arnoud V. den Boer, 2022. "Price Optimization Under the Finite-Mixture Logit Model," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(10), pages 7480-7496, October.
    8. Hongmin Li & Scott Webster, 2023. "Technical Note—Optimizing Risk-Balancing Return Under Discrete Choice Models," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 71(6), pages 2232-2244, November.
    9. Ruxian Wang, 2018. "When Prospect Theory Meets Consumer Choice Models: Assortment and Pricing Management with Reference Prices," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 583-600, July.
    10. Strauss, Arne K. & Klein, Robert & Steinhardt, Claudius, 2018. "A review of choice-based revenue management: Theory and methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(2), pages 375-387.
    11. Xiaobo Li & Hailong Sun & Chung Piaw Teo, 2022. "Convex Optimization for Bundle Size Pricing Problem," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(2), pages 1095-1106, February.
    12. Kameng Nip & Zhenbo Wang & Zizhuo Wang, 2021. "Assortment Optimization under a Single Transition Choice Model," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(7), pages 2122-2142, July.
    13. Ruxian Wang, 2022. "The Threshold Effects on Consumer Choice and Pricing Decisions," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 24(1), pages 448-466, January.
    14. Fatemeh Nosrat & William L. Cooper & Zizhuo Wang, 2021. "Pricing for a product with network effects and mixed logit demand," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 68(2), pages 159-182, March.
    15. Hongmin Li & Scott Webster, 2017. "Optimal Pricing of Correlated Product Options Under the Paired Combinatorial Logit Model," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(5), pages 1215-1230, October.
    16. Schlicher, Loe & Lurkin, Virginie, 2022. "Stable allocations for choice-based collaborative price setting," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(3), pages 1242-1254.
    17. Jing-Sheng Song & Zhengliang Xue & Xiaobei Shen, 2026. "Dynamic Pricing and Inventory Control for Substitutable Products Based on Market Conditions," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 28(1), pages 255-270, January.
    18. Ruxian Wang & Zizhuo Wang, 2017. "Consumer Choice Models with Endogenous Network Effects," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(11), pages 3944-3960, November.
    19. Rui Chen & Hai Jiang, 2020. "Capacitated assortment and price optimization under the nested logit model," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 77(4), pages 895-918, August.
    20. Hongmin Li, 2020. "Optimal Pricing Under Diffusion-Choice Models," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(1), pages 115-133, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:24:y:2022:i:2:p:1241-1260. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.