IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/oropre/v71y2023i6p2232-2244.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Technical Note—Optimizing Risk-Balancing Return Under Discrete Choice Models

Author

Listed:
  • Hongmin Li

    (W.P. Carey School of Business, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287)

  • Scott Webster

    (W.P. Carey School of Business, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287)

Abstract

We examine a firm’s pricing decision when managing a broad product line with the goal of optimally balancing the expected return on product investment with the revenue or profit risk associated with uncertain customer choices. We consider the multinomial logit (MNL) model and the mean-variance objective function and illustrate how the level of risk tolerance influences the firm’s optimal markups. We show that the solution approach and results generalize to the nested logit (NL) choice model and alternative risk-adjusted objectives. This paper is the first in the literature addressing risk-sensitive pricing under discrete choice models. Our analysis presents how the firm’s optimal pricing decision evolves with increasing risk sensitivity. The optimal risk-balancing solution stands in contrast to the profit-maximizing solution: for example, (i) the firm’s distaste for risk not only causes the firm to discount its products in exchange for lower profit volatility but also reduces the firm’s incentive to price differentiate among the products; (ii) although risk drives the firm to attain a higher total market share through lower prices at the cost of lower profit, certain products may gain, whereas others may lose in market share; and (iii) the optimal risk-balancing markups follow the sequence of product quality, whereas the optimal adjusted markups (i.e., markups adjusted for product-specific price sensitivity) follow the reverse sequence of quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Hongmin Li & Scott Webster, 2023. "Technical Note—Optimizing Risk-Balancing Return Under Discrete Choice Models," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 71(6), pages 2232-2244, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:71:y:2023:i:6:p:2232-2244
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.2023.2465
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.2023.2465
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.2023.2465?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:71:y:2023:i:6:p:2232-2244. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.