IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v24y2022i1p333-351.html

The Internet of Things and Information Fusion: Who Talks to Who?

Author

Listed:
  • Soroush Saghafian

    (Harvard Kennedy School, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138)

  • Brian Tomlin

    (Tuck School of Business, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755)

  • Stephan Biller

    (Advanced Manufacturing International, Clearwater, Florida 33762)

Abstract

Problem definition : Autonomous sensors connected through the internet of things (IoT) are deployed by different firms in the same environment. The sensors measure an important operating-condition state variable, but their measurements are noisy, so estimates are imperfect. Sensors can improve their own estimates by soliciting estimates from other sensors. The choice of which sensors to communicate with (target) is challenging because sensors (1) are constrained in the number of sensors they can target and (2) only have partial knowledge of how other sensors operate—that is, they do not know others’ underlying inference algorithms/models. We study the targeting problem, examine the evolution of interfirm sensor communication patterns, and explore what drives the patterns. Academic/practical relevance : Many industries are increasingly using sensors to drive improvements in key performance metrics (e.g., asset uptime) through better information on operating conditions. Sensors will communicate among themselves to improve estimation. This IoT vision will have a major impact on operations management (OM), and OM scholars need to develop and examine models and frameworks to better understand sensor interactions. Methodology : Analytic modeling combining decision-making, estimation, optimization, and learning is used. Results : We show that when selecting its target(s), each sensor needs to consider both the measurement quality of the other sensors and its level of familiarity with their inference models. We establish that the state of the environment plays a key role in mediating quality and familiarity. When sensor qualities are public, we show that each sensor eventually settles on a constant target set, but this long-run target set is sample-path dependent (i.e., dependent on past states) and varies by sensor. The long-run network, however, can be fully defined at time zero as a random directed graph, and hence, one can probabilistically predict it. This prediction can be made perfect (i.e., the network can be identified in a deterministic way) after observing the state values for a limited number of periods. When sensor qualities are private, our results reveal that sensors may not settle on a constant target set but the subset among which it cycles can still be stochastically predicted. Managerial implications : Our work allows managers to predict (and influence) the set of other firms with which their sensors will form information links. Analogous to a manufacturer mapping its supplier base to help manage supply continuity, our work enables a firm to map its sensor-based-information suppliers to help manage information continuity.

Suggested Citation

  • Soroush Saghafian & Brian Tomlin & Stephan Biller, 2022. "The Internet of Things and Information Fusion: Who Talks to Who?," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 24(1), pages 333-351, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:24:y:2022:i:1:p:333-351
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2020.0958
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.2020.0958
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2020.0958?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kenneth Wallis, 2011. "Combining forecasts - forty years later," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1-2), pages 33-41.
    2. Rajiv Sethi & Muhamet Yildiz, 2016. "Communication With Unknown Perspectives," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 84, pages 2029-2069, November.
    3. Simchi-Levi, David, 2010. "Operation Rules: Delivering Customer Value through Flexible Operations," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262525151, December.
    4. Saghafian, Soroush, 2018. "Ambiguous partially observable Markov decision processes: Structural results and applications," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 1-35.
    5. Erick Delage & Shie Mannor, 2010. "Percentile Optimization for Markov Decision Processes with Parameter Uncertainty," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(1), pages 203-213, February.
    6. Gerry Tsoukalas & Brett Hemenway Falk, 2020. "Token-Weighted Crowdsourcing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(9), pages 3843-3859, September.
    7. Robert L. Winkler & Robert T. Clemen, 2004. "Multiple Experts vs. Multiple Methods: Combining Correlation Assessments," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 1(3), pages 167-176, September.
    8. Soroush Saghafian & Brian Tomlin, 2016. "The Newsvendor under Demand Ambiguity: Combining Data with Moment and Tail Information," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(1), pages 167-185, February.
    9. Alison Hubbard Ashton & Robert H. Ashton, 1985. "Aggregating Subjective Forecasts: Some Empirical Results," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(12), pages 1499-1508, December.
    10. Georgia Perakis & Guillaume Roels, 2008. "Regret in the Newsvendor Model with Partial Information," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(1), pages 188-203, February.
    11. Ruslan Momot & Elena Belavina & Karan Girotra, 2020. "The Use and Value of Social Information in Selective Selling of Exclusive Products," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(6), pages 2610-2627, June.
    12. Jordan Tong & Daniel Feiler, 2017. "A Behavioral Model of Forecasting: Naive Statistics on Mental Samples," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(11), pages 3609-3627, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li, Xiufeng & Li, Bo & Song, Dongping, 2026. "Internet of things platform encroachment and manufacturer product selection strategy:The role of technology level and data value," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    2. Zibin Cui & Chengming Du & You Zhao & Rui Hou & Zhonghui Ding, 2025. "A bane or a boon? impacts of IoT cyber-defense improvement in e-commerce channel," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 668-690, June.
    3. Xiufeng Li & Zhen Zhang, 2025. "Internet of Things Network Security Improvement Investment," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 67(2), pages 209-225, April.
    4. Indranil Bardhan & Rajiv Kohli & Eivor Oborn & Abhay Mishra & Chuan Hoo Tan & Monica Chiarini Tremblay & Suprateek Sarker, 2025. "Human-Centric Information Systems Research on the Digital Future of Healthcare," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 36(1), pages 1-20, March.
    5. Li, Xiufeng & Li, Lei & Ma, Shaojun, 2025. "Identifying the role of contracts in driving value cocreation between the internet of things platform and smart product manufacturer," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    6. Xin Zhang & Xiong Zhang & Lihong Cheng, 2026. "IoT-enabled green product development under competition: the impact of digital value-added services," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 359(1), pages 395-427, April.
    7. Tao Lu & Brian Tomlin, 2023. "Forewarned Is Forearmed? Contingent Sourcing, Shipment Information, and Supplier Competition," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 25(5), pages 1796-1813, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Saghafian, Soroush & Tomlin, Brian & Biller, Stephan, 2018. "The Internet of Things and Information Fusion: Who Talks to Who?," Working Paper Series rwp18-009, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    2. Boylan, John E. & Babai, M. Zied, 2022. "Estimating the cumulative distribution function of lead-time demand using bootstrapping with and without replacement," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    3. Omar Besbes & Omar Mouchtaki, 2023. "How Big Should Your Data Really Be? Data-Driven Newsvendor: Learning One Sample at a Time," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(10), pages 5848-5865, October.
    4. Xi Chen & Simai He & Bo Jiang & Christopher Thomas Ryan & Teng Zhang, 2021. "The Discrete Moment Problem with Nonconvex Shape Constraints," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 69(1), pages 279-296, January.
    5. Saghafian, Soroush, 2018. "Ambiguous partially observable Markov decision processes: Structural results and applications," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 1-35.
    6. Bajgiran, Amirsaman H. & Mardikoraem, Mahsa & Soofi, Ehsan S., 2021. "Maximum entropy distributions with quantile information," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(1), pages 196-209.
    7. Anh Ninh, 2021. "Robust newsvendor problems with compound Poisson demands," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 302(1), pages 327-338, July.
    8. Maximilian Blesch & Philipp Eisenhauer, 2023. "Robust Decision-Making under Risk and Ambiguity," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 463, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
    9. Bai, Qingguo & Xu, Jianteng & Gong, Yeming & Chauhan, Satyaveer S., 2022. "Robust decisions for regulated sustainable manufacturing with partial demand information: Mandatory emission capacity versus emission tax," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(3), pages 874-893.
    10. Christopher W. Karvetski & David R. Mandel & Daniel Irwin, 2020. "Improving Probability Judgment in Intelligence Analysis: From Structured Analysis to Statistical Aggregation," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(5), pages 1040-1057, May.
    11. Kim, Yun Geon & Chung, Byung Do, 2024. "Data-driven Wasserstein distributionally robust dual-sourcing inventory model under uncertain demand," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    12. Karthik Natarajan & Melvyn Sim & Joline Uichanco, 2018. "Asymmetry and Ambiguity in Newsvendor Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(7), pages 3146-3167, July.
    13. Soroush Saghafian, 2024. "Ambiguous Dynamic Treatment Regimes: A Reinforcement Learning Approach," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(9), pages 5667-5690, September.
    14. Alireza Boloori & Soroush Saghafian & Harini A. Chakkera & Curtiss B. Cook, 2020. "Data-Driven Management of Post-transplant Medications: An Ambiguous Partially Observable Markov Decision Process Approach," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(5), pages 1066-1087, September.
    15. Tian, Xuecheng & Wang, Shuaian & Laporte, Gilbert & Yang, Ying, 2024. "Determinism versus uncertainty: Examining the worst-case expected performance of data-driven policies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 318(1), pages 242-252.
    16. David R. Mandel & Christopher W. Karvetski & Mandeep K. Dhami, 2018. "Boosting intelligence analysts’ judgment accuracy: What works, what fails?," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 13(6), pages 607-621, November.
    17. von der Gracht, Heiko A. & Hommel, Ulrich & Prokesch, Tobias & Wohlenberg, Holger, 2016. "Testing weighting approaches for forecasting in a Group Wisdom Support System environment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(10), pages 4081-4094.
    18. Maximilian Blesch & Philipp Eisenhauer, 2021. "Robust Decision-Making Under Risk and Ambiguity," ECONtribute Discussion Papers Series 104, University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany.
    19. Kostas Bimpikis & Yiangos Papanastasiou & Wenchang Zhang, 2024. "Information Provision in Two-Sided Platforms: Optimizing for Supply," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(7), pages 4533-4547, July.
    20. Lucas Osmani & Abdel Lisser & Vikas Vikram Singh, 2026. "Zero-sum discounted stochastic games with random rewards," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 358(3), pages 1453-1484, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:24:y:2022:i:1:p:333-351. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.