IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v22y2020i3p615-632.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Production Campaign Planning Under Learning and Decay

Author

Listed:
  • Hossein Jahandideh

    (Anderson School of Management, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095-1481)

  • Kumar Rajaram

    (Anderson School of Management, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095-1481)

  • Kevin McCardle

    (Anderson School of Management, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095-1481)

Abstract

Problem definition : We analyze a catalyst-activated batch-production process with uncertainty in production times, learning about catalyst-productivity characteristics and decay of catalyst performance across batches. The goal is to determine the quality level of batches and to decide when to replenish a catalyst so as to minimize average costs, consisting of inventory-holding, backlogging, and catalyst-switching costs. Academic/practical relevance : This is an important problem in a variety of process-industry sectors, such as food processing, pharmaceuticals, and specialty chemicals, but has not been adequately studied in the academic literature. This paper also contributes to the stochastic economic lot-sizing literature. Methodology : We formulate this problem as a semi-Markov decision process (SMDP) and develop a two-level heuristic to solve this problem. The heuristic consists of a lower-level problem that plans the duration of batches within the current campaign to maximize the efficiency of the catalyst while ensuring that the target attribute level for each batch is set to meet a quality specification represented by an average attribute level across all the batches in a campaign. The higher-level problem determines when to replace the costly catalyst as its productivity decays. To evaluate our heuristic, we present a lower bound on the optimal value of the SMDP. This bound accounts for all costs, as well as the randomness and discreteness in the process. We then extend our methods to multiple-product settings, which results in an advanced stochastic economic lot-sizing problem. Results : We test our proposed solution methodology with data from a leading food-processing company and show that our methods outperform current practice with an average improvement of around 22% in costs. In addition, compared with the stochastic lower bounds, our results show that the two-level heuristic attains near-optimal performance for the intractable multidimensional SMDP. Managerial implications : Our results generate three important managerial insights. First, our simulation-based lower bound provides a close approximation to the optimal cost of the SMDP, and it is nearly attainable by using a relatively simple two-level heuristic. Second, the reoptimization policy used in the lower-level problem adequately captures the value of information and Bayesian learning. Third, in the higher-level problem of choosing when to replace a catalyst, the intractable multidimensional state of the system is efficiently summarized by a single statistic: the probability of inventory falling below a specific threshold.

Suggested Citation

  • Hossein Jahandideh & Kumar Rajaram & Kevin McCardle, 2020. "Production Campaign Planning Under Learning and Decay," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(3), pages 615-632, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:22:y:2020:i:3:p:615-632
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2018.0766
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2018.0766
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2018.0766?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kumar Rajaram & Uday S. Karmarkar, 2002. "Product Cycling With Uncertain Yields: Analysis and Application to the Process Industry," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 50(4), pages 680-691, August.
    2. Retsef Levi & Cong Shi, 2013. "Approximation Algorithms for the Stochastic Lot-Sizing Problem with Order Lead Times," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(3), pages 593-602, June.
    3. Joseph B. Mazzola & Kevin F. McCardle, 1996. "A Bayesian Approach to Managing Learning-Curve Uncertainty," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(5), pages 680-692, May.
    4. Papachristos, S. & Konstantaras, I., 2006. "Economic ordering quantity models for items with imperfect quality," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(1), pages 148-154, March.
    5. Vaughan, Timothy S., 2007. "Cyclical schedules vs. dynamic sequencing: Replenishment dynamics and inventory efficiency," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(2), pages 518-527, June.
    6. Nils Löhndorf & Stefan Minner, 2013. "Simulation optimization for the stochastic economic lot scheduling problem," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(7), pages 796-810.
    7. David B. Brown & James E. Smith, 2013. "Optimal Sequential Exploration: Bandits, Clairvoyants, and Wildcats," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(3), pages 644-665, June.
    8. Winands, E.M.M. & Adan, I.J.B.F. & van Houtum, G.J., 2011. "The stochastic economic lot scheduling problem: A survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 210(1), pages 1-9, April.
    9. Awi Federgruen & Ziv Katalan, 1996. "The Stochastic Economic Lot Scheduling Problem: Cyclical Base-Stock Policies with Idle Times," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(6), pages 783-796, June.
    10. Kumar Rajaram & Zhili Tian, 2009. "Buffer location and sizing to optimize cost and quality in semi-continuous manufacturing processes: Methodology and application," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(12), pages 1035-1048.
    11. Kumar Rajaram & Uday S. Karmarkar, 2004. "Campaign Planning and Scheduling for Multiproduct Batch Operations with Applications to the Food-Processing Industry," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 6(3), pages 253-269, October.
    12. Dragos Florin Ciocan & Vivek Farias, 2012. "Model Predictive Control for Dynamic Resource Allocation," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 37(3), pages 501-525, August.
    13. Leroy B. Schwarz, 2008. "The Economic Order-Quantity (EOQ) Model," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Dilip Chhajed & Timothy J. Lowe (ed.), Building Intuition, chapter 8, pages 135-154, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Menezes, Mozart B.C. & Jalali, Hamed & Lamas, Alejandro, 2021. "One too many: Product proliferation and the financial performance in manufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    2. Wei, Liqun & Zhang, Jianxiong, 2021. "Strategic substitutes or complements? The relationship between capacity sharing and postponement flexibility," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(1), pages 138-148.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Briskorn, Dirk & Zeise, Philipp & Packowski, Josef, 2016. "Quasi-fixed cyclic production schemes for multiple products with stochastic demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(1), pages 156-169.
    2. Mili Mehrotra & Milind Dawande & Srinagesh Gavirneni & Mehmet Demirci & Sridhar Tayur, 2011. "OR PRACTICE---Production Planning with Patterns: A Problem from Processed Food Manufacturing," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(2), pages 267-282, April.
    3. Löhndorf, Nils & Riel, Manuel & Minner, Stefan, 2014. "Simulation optimization for the stochastic economic lot scheduling problem with sequence-dependent setup times," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 170-176.
    4. Huanan Zhang & Cong Shi & Chao Qin & Cheng Hua, 2016. "Stochastic regret minimization for revenue management problems with nonstationary demands," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 63(6), pages 433-448, September.
    5. Alberto Vera & Siddhartha Banerjee, 2021. "The Bayesian Prophet: A Low-Regret Framework for Online Decision Making," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(3), pages 1368-1391, March.
    6. Menezes, Mozart B.C. & Jalali, Hamed & Lamas, Alejandro, 2021. "One too many: Product proliferation and the financial performance in manufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    7. Garn, Wolfgang & Aitken, James, 2015. "Agile factorial production for a single manufacturing line with multiple products," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(3), pages 754-766.
    8. Dirk Briskorn & Philipp Zeise, 2019. "A cyclic production scheme for the synchronized and integrated two-level lot-sizing and scheduling problem with no-wait restrictions and stochastic demand," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 41(4), pages 895-942, December.
    9. Van Nieuwenhuyse, Inneke & Vandaele, Nico & Rajaram, Kumar & Karmarkar, Uday S., 2007. "Buffer sizing in multi-product multi-reactor batch processes: Impact of allocation and campaign sizing policies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 179(2), pages 424-443, June.
    10. Germs, Remco & Van Foreest, Nicky D., 2011. "Admission policies for the customized stochastic lot scheduling problem with strict due-dates," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 213(2), pages 375-383, September.
    11. Bell, Peter N, 2015. "Mineral exploration as a game of chance," MPRA Paper 62159, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. José Niño-Mora, 2023. "Markovian Restless Bandits and Index Policies: A Review," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-27, March.
    13. Hsu, Jia-Tzer & Hsu, Lie-Fern, 2013. "An EOQ model with imperfect quality items, inspection errors, shortage backordering, and sales returns," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(1), pages 162-170.
    14. Sher, Mikhail M. & Kim, Seung-Lae & Banerjee, Avijit & Paz, Michael T., 2018. "A supply chain coordination mechanism for common items subject to failure in the electronics, defense, and medical industries," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 164-173.
    15. Nasr, Walid W. & Jaber, Mohamad Y., 2019. "Supplier development in a two-level lot sizing problem with non-conforming items and learning," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 349-363.
    16. Tien-Yu Lin & Kuo-Lung Hou, 2015. "An imperfect quality economic order quantity with advanced receiving," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 23(2), pages 535-551, July.
    17. Sami Najafi-Asadolahi & Kristin Fridgeirsdottir, 2014. "Cost-per-Click Pricing for Display Advertising," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 16(4), pages 482-497, October.
    18. Lee, Hsu-Hua, 2008. "The investment model in preventive maintenance in multi-level production systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(2), pages 816-828, April.
    19. Beck, Fabian G. & Biel, Konstantin & Glock, Christoph H., 2019. "Integration of energy aspects into the economic lot scheduling problem," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 399-410.
    20. Karzan Ghafour, 2017. "The Role of Items Quantity Constraint to Control the Optimal Economic Order Quantity," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(9), pages 1-61, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:22:y:2020:i:3:p:615-632. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.