IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormoor/v44y2019i1p264-276.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Entropic Barrier: Exponential Families, Log-Concave Geometry, and Self-Concordance

Author

Listed:
  • Sébastien Bubeck

    (Microsoft Research Redmond, Redmond, Washington 98052)

  • Ronen Eldan

    (Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel)

Abstract

We prove that the Cramér transform of the uniform measure on a convex body in ℝ n is a (1 + o (1)) n -self-concordant barrier, improving a seminal result of Nesterov and Nemirovski. This gives the first explicit construction of a universal barrier for convex bodies with optimal self-concordance parameter. The proof is based on basic geometry of log-concave distributions and elementary duality in exponential families. As a side result, our calculations also show that the universal barrier of Nesterov and Nemirovski is exactly n -self-concordant on convex cones.

Suggested Citation

  • Sébastien Bubeck & Ronen Eldan, 2019. "The Entropic Barrier: Exponential Families, Log-Concave Geometry, and Self-Concordance," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 44(1), pages 264-276, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormoor:v:44:y:2019:i:1:p:264-276
    DOI: 10.1287/moor.2017.0923
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.2017.0923
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/moor.2017.0923?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ravindran Kannan & Hariharan Narayanan, 2012. "Random Walks on Polytopes and an Affine Interior Point Method for Linear Programming," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 37(1), pages 1-20, February.
    2. Roland Hildebrand, 2014. "Canonical Barriers on Convex Cones," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 39(3), pages 841-850, August.
    3. Thomas M. Cover, 1991. "Universal Portfolios," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 1(1), pages 1-29, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Foster, Dean P. & Vohra, Rakesh, 1999. "Regret in the On-Line Decision Problem," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 29(1-2), pages 7-35, October.
    2. Seung-Hyun Moon & Yong-Hyuk Kim & Byung-Ro Moon, 2019. "Empirical investigation of state-of-the-art mean reversion strategies for equity markets," Papers 1909.04327, arXiv.org.
    3. Man Yiu Tsang & Tony Sit & Hoi Ying Wong, 2022. "Adaptive Robust Online Portfolio Selection," Papers 2206.01064, arXiv.org.
    4. Luo, Yong & Zhu, Bo & Tang, Yong, 2014. "Simulated annealing algorithm for optimal capital growth," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 408(C), pages 10-18.
    5. Fabio Stella & Alfonso Ventura, 2011. "Defensive online portfolio selection," International Journal of Financial Markets and Derivatives, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(1/2), pages 88-105.
    6. Erhan Bayraktar & Donghan Kim & Abhishek Tilva, 2023. "Quantifying dimensional change in stochastic portfolio theory," Papers 2303.00858, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2023.
    7. Ormos, Mihály & Urbán, András & Zoltán, Tamás, 2009. "Logoptimális portfóliók empirikus vizsgálata [Empirical analysis of log-optimal portfolios]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(1), pages 1-18.
    8. Jarrod Wilcox, 2020. "Better portfolios with higher moments," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(7), pages 569-580, December.
    9. Dmitry B. Rokhlin, 2021. "Relative utility bounds for empirically optimal portfolios," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 93(3), pages 437-462, June.
    10. Vladimir V'yugin, 2014. "Log-Optimal Portfolio Selection Using the Blackwell Approachability Theorem," Papers 1410.5996, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2015.
    11. R'emi J'ez'equel & Dmitrii M. Ostrovskii & Pierre Gaillard, 2022. "Efficient and Near-Optimal Online Portfolio Selection," Papers 2209.13932, arXiv.org.
    12. Miquel Noguer i Alonso & Sonam Srivastava, 2020. "Deep Reinforcement Learning for Asset Allocation in US Equities," Papers 2010.04404, arXiv.org.
    13. Malo Huard & Rémy Garnier & Gilles Stoltz, 2020. "Hierarchical robust aggregation of sales forecasts at aggregated levels in e-commerce, based on exponential smoothing and Holt's linear trend method," Working Papers hal-02794320, HAL.
    14. Christopher Dance & Alexei Gaivoronski, 2012. "Stochastic optimization for real time service capacity allocation under random service demand," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 193(1), pages 221-253, March.
    15. James Chok & Geoffrey M. Vasil, 2023. "Convex optimization over a probability simplex," Papers 2305.09046, arXiv.org.
    16. Shmilovici Armin & Ben-Gal Irad, 2012. "Predicting Stock Returns Using a Variable Order Markov Tree Model," Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, De Gruyter, vol. 16(5), pages 1-33, December.
    17. Pavel Shcherbakov & Mingyue Ding & Ming Yuchi, 2021. "Random Sampling Many-Dimensional Sets Arising in Control," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-16, March.
    18. Bin Li & Steven C. H. Hoi, 2012. "On-Line Portfolio Selection with Moving Average Reversion," Papers 1206.4626, arXiv.org.
    19. Alex Garivaltis, 2018. "Super-Replication of the Best Pairs Trade in Hindsight," Papers 1810.02444, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2022.
    20. Ha, Youngmin & Zhang, Hai, 2020. "Algorithmic trading for online portfolio selection under limited market liquidity," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(3), pages 1033-1051.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormoor:v:44:y:2019:i:1:p:264-276. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.