Author
Listed:
- Vanessa C. Burbano
(Columbia Business School, New York, New York 10027)
- Olle Folke
(Uppsala University, 752 36 Uppsala, Sweden)
- Stephan Meier
(Columbia Business School, New York, New York 10027)
- Johanna Rickne
(Stockholm University, 114 19 Stockholm, Sweden; Stockholm School of Economics, 113 83 Stockholm, Sweden; Nottingham University, Nottingham NG7 2RD, United Kingdom)
Abstract
An understanding of differences in nonmonetary work conditions is fundamental for a complete characterization of individuals’ well-being at work. Thus, to fully characterize gender inequalities in the labor market, scholars have begun to explore gender differences in nonmonetary work conditions. We examine one such condition—meaningful work—using nationally representative survey data linked with worker and employer administrative data. We document a large and expanding gender gap in meaningful work, wherein women experience their jobs as more meaningful than men do. We then explore patterns underlying this difference. We find little correlation between women’s higher experience of meaningful work and either labor market decisions related to first parenthood or women’s underrepresentation in leadership jobs. Instead, the gender gap appears to be highly correlated with the sorting of more women into occupations with a high level of beneficence: the sense of having a prosocial impact. Though both women and men experience such jobs as more meaningful, women do so by a larger margin. Next, we consider the relationship between the gender difference in meaningful work and the gender wage gap, contributing to the discussion on compensating differentials in work amenities. We find that, whereas the gender gap in meaningful work closes a substantial part of the wage gap in lower paid jobs, it does little to close the gap in higher paid jobs in which the gender wage gap is largest.
Suggested Citation
Vanessa C. Burbano & Olle Folke & Stephan Meier & Johanna Rickne, 2024.
"The Gender Gap in Meaningful Work,"
Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(10), pages 7004-7023, October.
Handle:
RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:70:y:2024:i:10:p:7004-7023
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2022.01807
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:70:y:2024:i:10:p:7004-7023. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.