IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v60y2014i6p1552-1573.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Business Analytics for Flexible Resource Allocation Under Random Emergencies

Author

Listed:
  • Mallik Angalakudati

    (Pacific Gas and Electric Company, San Ramon, California 94583)

  • Siddharth Balwani

    (BloomReach, Mountain View, California 94041; and Leaders for Global Operations, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139)

  • Jorge Calzada

    (National Grid, Waltham, Massachusetts 02451)

  • Bikram Chatterjee

    (Pacific Gas and Electric Company, San Ramon, California 94583)

  • Georgia Perakis

    (Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139)

  • Nicolas Raad

    (National Grid, Waltham, Massachusetts 02451)

  • Joline Uichanco

    (Operations Research Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139)

Abstract

In this paper, we describe both applied and analytical work in collaboration with a large multistate gas utility. The project addressed a major operational resource allocation challenge that is typical to the industry. We study the resource allocation problem in which some of the tasks are scheduled and known in advance, and some are unpredictable and have to be addressed as they appear. The utility has maintenance crews that perform both standard jobs (each must be done before a specified deadline) as well as respond to emergency gas leaks (that occur randomly throughout the day and could disrupt the schedule and lead to significant overtime). The goal is to perform all the standard jobs by their respective deadlines, to address all emergency jobs in a timely manner, and to minimize maintenance crew overtime. We employ a novel decomposition approach that solves the problem in two phases. The first is a job scheduling phase, where standard jobs are scheduled over a time horizon. The second is a crew assignment phase, which solves a stochastic mixed integer program to assign jobs to maintenance crews under a stochastic number of future emergencies. For the first phase, we propose a heuristic based on the rounding of a linear programming relaxation formulation and prove an analytical worst-case performance guarantee. For the second phase, we propose an algorithm for assigning crews that is motivated by the structure of an optimal solution. We used our models and heuristics to develop a decision support tool that is being piloted in one of the utility's sites. Using the utility's data, we project that the tool will result in a 55% reduction in overtime hours. This paper was accepted by Noah Gans, special issue on business analytics .

Suggested Citation

  • Mallik Angalakudati & Siddharth Balwani & Jorge Calzada & Bikram Chatterjee & Georgia Perakis & Nicolas Raad & Joline Uichanco, 2014. "Business Analytics for Flexible Resource Allocation Under Random Emergencies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(6), pages 1552-1573, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:60:y:2014:i:6:p:1552-1573
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2014.1919
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1919
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1919?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John R. Birge, 1997. "State-of-the-Art-Survey---Stochastic Programming: Computation and Applications," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 9(2), pages 111-133, May.
    2. Lamiri, Mehdi & Xie, Xiaolan & Dolgui, Alexandre & Grimaud, Frederic, 2008. "A stochastic model for operating room planning with elective and emergency demand for surgery," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(3), pages 1026-1037, March.
    3. Celia A. Glass & Hans Kellerer, 2007. "Parallel machine scheduling with job assignment restrictions," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(3), pages 250-257, April.
    4. Jinwen Ou & Joseph Y.‐T. Leung & Chung‐Lun Li, 2008. "Scheduling parallel machines with inclusive processing set restrictions," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 55(4), pages 328-338, June.
    5. Woonghee Tim Huh & Nan Liu & Van-Anh Truong, 2013. "Multiresource Allocation Scheduling in Dynamic Environments," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 15(2), pages 280-291, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Georgia Perakis & Donald Rosenfield, 2018. "The MIT Leaders for Global Operations Program," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 48(3), pages 189-203, June.
    2. Sheng Liu & Long He & Zuo-Jun Max Shen, 2021. "On-Time Last-Mile Delivery: Order Assignment with Travel-Time Predictors," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(7), pages 4095-4119, July.
    3. Athanasopoulos, George & Hyndman, Rob J. & Kourentzes, Nikolaos & Petropoulos, Fotios, 2017. "Forecasting with temporal hierarchies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(1), pages 60-74.
    4. Nikolai Stein & Jan Meller & Christoph M. Flath, 2018. "Big data on the shop-floor: sensor-based decision-support for manual processes," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 88(5), pages 593-616, July.
    5. Adam N. Elmachtoub & Paul Grigas, 2022. "Smart “Predict, then Optimize”," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(1), pages 9-26, January.
    6. Song, Malin & Xie, Qianjiao & Tan, Kim Hua & Wang, Jianlin, 2020. "A fair distribution and transfer mechanism of forest tourism benefits in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    7. Tinglong Dai & Sridhar Tayur, 2020. "OM Forum—Healthcare Operations Management: A Snapshot of Emerging Research," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(5), pages 869-887, September.
    8. Jae Hyeung Kang & James G. Matusik & Lizabeth A. Barclay, 2017. "Affective and Normative Motives to Work Overtime in Asian Organizations: Four Cultural Orientations from Confucian Ethics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 140(1), pages 115-130, January.
    9. Black, Ben & Ainslie, Russell & Dokka, Trivikram & Kirkbride, Christopher, 2023. "Distributionally robust resource planning under binomial demand intakes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(1), pages 227-242.
    10. Gülpınar, Nalan & Çanakoğlu, Ethem & Branke, Juergen, 2018. "Heuristics for the stochastic dynamic task-resource allocation problem with retry opportunities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(1), pages 291-303.
    11. Brandt, Tobias & Wagner, Sebastian & Neumann, Dirk, 2021. "Prescriptive analytics in public-sector decision-making: A framework and insights from charging infrastructure planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(1), pages 379-393.
    12. Wagner, Sebastian & Brandt, Tobias & Neumann, Dirk, 2016. "In free float: Developing Business Analytics support for carsharing providers," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 59(PA), pages 4-14.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael Samudra & Carla Van Riet & Erik Demeulemeester & Brecht Cardoen & Nancy Vansteenkiste & Frank E. Rademakers, 2016. "Scheduling operating rooms: achievements, challenges and pitfalls," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 19(5), pages 493-525, October.
    2. Jinwen Ou & Xueling Zhong & Xiangtong Qi, 2016. "Scheduling parallel machines with inclusive processing set restrictions and job rejection," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 63(8), pages 667-681, December.
    3. Huiqiao Su & Michael Pinedo & Guohua Wan, 2017. "Parallel machine scheduling with eligibility constraints: A composite dispatching rule to minimize total weighted tardiness," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(3), pages 249-267, April.
    4. repec:ipg:wpaper:2013-014 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Di Feng & Bettina Klaus, 2022. "Preference revelation games and strict cores of multiple‐type housing market problems," International Journal of Economic Theory, The International Society for Economic Theory, vol. 18(1), pages 61-76, March.
    6. Karsten Schwarz & Michael Römer & Taïeb Mellouli, 2019. "A data-driven hierarchical MILP approach for scheduling clinical pathways: a real-world case study from a German university hospital," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 12(2), pages 597-636, December.
    7. repec:ipg:wpaper:14 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Sebastian Rachuba & Brigitte Werners, 2017. "A fuzzy multi-criteria approach for robust operating room schedules," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 251(1), pages 325-350, April.
    9. André Rossi & Alexis Aubry & Mireille Jacomino, 2011. "A sensitivity analysis to assess the completion time deviation for multi-purpose machines facing demand uncertainty," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 191(1), pages 219-249, November.
    10. Zhang, Yu & Wang, Yu & Tang, Jiafu & Lim, Andrew, 2020. "Mitigating overtime risk in tactical surgical scheduling," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    11. Shuwan Zhu & Wenjuan Fan & Xueping Li & Shanlin Yang, 2023. "Ambulance dispatching and operating room scheduling considering reusable resources in mass-casualty incidents," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 1-37, June.
    12. Miao Bai & Bjorn Berg & Esra Sisikoglu Sir & Mustafa Y. Sir, 2023. "Partially partitioned templating strategies for outpatient specialty practices," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(1), pages 301-318, January.
    13. Range, Troels Martin & Kozlowski, Dawid & Petersen, Niels Chr., 2019. "Dynamic job assignment: A column generation approach with an application to surgery allocation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(1), pages 78-93.
    14. Sauré, Antoine & Patrick, Jonathan & Tyldesley, Scott & Puterman, Martin L., 2012. "Dynamic multi-appointment patient scheduling for radiation therapy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 223(2), pages 573-584.
    15. Jie Yang & Fang He & Xi Lin & Max Zuo‐Jun Shen, 2021. "Mechanism Design for Stochastic Dynamic Parking Resource Allocation," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(10), pages 3615-3634, October.
    16. Fanwen Meng & Jin Qi & Meilin Zhang & James Ang & Singfat Chu & Melvyn Sim, 2015. "A Robust Optimization Model for Managing Elective Admission in a Public Hospital," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(6), pages 1452-1467, December.
    17. João Flávio de Freitas Almeida & Samuel Vieira Conceição & Luiz Ricardo Pinto & Ricardo Saraiva de Camargo & Gilberto de Miranda Júnior, 2018. "Flexibility evaluation of multiechelon supply chains," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(3), pages 1-27, March.
    18. Keumseok Kang & J. George Shanthikumar & Kemal Altinkemer, 2016. "Postponable Acceptance and Assignment: A Stochastic Dynamic Programming Approach," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 18(4), pages 493-508, October.
    19. Ferreira, Cristiane & Figueira, Gonçalo & Amorim, Pedro, 2021. "Scheduling Human-Robot Teams in collaborative working cells," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    20. Gartner, Daniel & Kolisch, Rainer, 2014. "Scheduling the hospital-wide flow of elective patients," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(3), pages 689-699.
    21. Lamiri, Mehdi & Grimaud, Frédéric & Xie, Xiaolan, 2009. "Optimization methods for a stochastic surgery planning problem," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(2), pages 400-410, August.
    22. Onur Tavaslıoğlu & Oleg A. Prokopyev & Andrew J. Schaefer, 2019. "Solving Stochastic and Bilevel Mixed-Integer Programs via a Generalized Value Function," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 1659-1677, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:60:y:2014:i:6:p:1552-1573. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.