IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v60y2014i6p1552-1573.html

Business Analytics for Flexible Resource Allocation Under Random Emergencies

Author

Listed:
  • Mallik Angalakudati

    (Pacific Gas and Electric Company, San Ramon, California 94583)

  • Siddharth Balwani

    (BloomReach, Mountain View, California 94041; and Leaders for Global Operations, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139)

  • Jorge Calzada

    (National Grid, Waltham, Massachusetts 02451)

  • Bikram Chatterjee

    (Pacific Gas and Electric Company, San Ramon, California 94583)

  • Georgia Perakis

    (Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139)

  • Nicolas Raad

    (National Grid, Waltham, Massachusetts 02451)

  • Joline Uichanco

    (Operations Research Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139)

Abstract

In this paper, we describe both applied and analytical work in collaboration with a large multistate gas utility. The project addressed a major operational resource allocation challenge that is typical to the industry. We study the resource allocation problem in which some of the tasks are scheduled and known in advance, and some are unpredictable and have to be addressed as they appear. The utility has maintenance crews that perform both standard jobs (each must be done before a specified deadline) as well as respond to emergency gas leaks (that occur randomly throughout the day and could disrupt the schedule and lead to significant overtime). The goal is to perform all the standard jobs by their respective deadlines, to address all emergency jobs in a timely manner, and to minimize maintenance crew overtime. We employ a novel decomposition approach that solves the problem in two phases. The first is a job scheduling phase, where standard jobs are scheduled over a time horizon. The second is a crew assignment phase, which solves a stochastic mixed integer program to assign jobs to maintenance crews under a stochastic number of future emergencies. For the first phase, we propose a heuristic based on the rounding of a linear programming relaxation formulation and prove an analytical worst-case performance guarantee. For the second phase, we propose an algorithm for assigning crews that is motivated by the structure of an optimal solution. We used our models and heuristics to develop a decision support tool that is being piloted in one of the utility's sites. Using the utility's data, we project that the tool will result in a 55% reduction in overtime hours. This paper was accepted by Noah Gans, special issue on business analytics .

Suggested Citation

  • Mallik Angalakudati & Siddharth Balwani & Jorge Calzada & Bikram Chatterjee & Georgia Perakis & Nicolas Raad & Joline Uichanco, 2014. "Business Analytics for Flexible Resource Allocation Under Random Emergencies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(6), pages 1552-1573, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:60:y:2014:i:6:p:1552-1573
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2014.1919
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1919
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1919?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Celia A. Glass & Hans Kellerer, 2007. "Parallel machine scheduling with job assignment restrictions," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(3), pages 250-257, April.
    2. Jinwen Ou & Joseph Y.‐T. Leung & Chung‐Lun Li, 2008. "Scheduling parallel machines with inclusive processing set restrictions," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 55(4), pages 328-338, June.
    3. John R. Birge, 1997. "State-of-the-Art-Survey---Stochastic Programming: Computation and Applications," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 9(2), pages 111-133, May.
    4. Woonghee Tim Huh & Nan Liu & Van-Anh Truong, 2013. "Multiresource Allocation Scheduling in Dynamic Environments," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 15(2), pages 280-291, May.
    5. Lamiri, Mehdi & Xie, Xiaolan & Dolgui, Alexandre & Grimaud, Frederic, 2008. "A stochastic model for operating room planning with elective and emergency demand for surgery," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(3), pages 1026-1037, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tobias Brandt & Oliver Dlugosch & Ayman Abdelwahed & Pieter L. van den Berg & Dirk Neumann, 2022. "Prescriptive Analytics in Urban Policing Operations," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 24(5), pages 2463-2480, September.
    2. Nikolai Stein & Jan Meller & Christoph M. Flath, 2018. "Big data on the shop-floor: sensor-based decision-support for manual processes," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 88(5), pages 593-616, July.
    3. Georgia Perakis & Donald Rosenfield, 2018. "The MIT Leaders for Global Operations Program," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 48(3), pages 189-203, June.
    4. Adam N. Elmachtoub & Paul Grigas, 2022. "Smart “Predict, then Optimize”," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(1), pages 9-26, January.
    5. Schäfers, A. & Bougioukos, V. & Karamatzanis, G. & Nikolopoulos, K., 2024. "Prediction-led prescription: Optimal Decision-Making in times of turbulence and business performance improvement," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    6. Wagner, Sebastian & Brandt, Tobias & Neumann, Dirk, 2016. "In free float: Developing Business Analytics support for carsharing providers," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 59(PA), pages 4-14.
    7. Black, Ben & Ainslie, Russell & Dokka, Trivikram & Kirkbride, Christopher, 2023. "Distributionally robust resource planning under binomial demand intakes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(1), pages 227-242.
    8. Gülpınar, Nalan & Çanakoğlu, Ethem & Branke, Juergen, 2018. "Heuristics for the stochastic dynamic task-resource allocation problem with retry opportunities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(1), pages 291-303.
    9. Song, Malin & Xie, Qianjiao & Tan, Kim Hua & Wang, Jianlin, 2020. "A fair distribution and transfer mechanism of forest tourism benefits in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    10. Aaron Babier & Timothy C. Y. Chan & Adam Diamant & Rafid Mahmood, 2025. "Learning to Optimize Contextually Constrained Problems for Real-Time Decision Generation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(2), pages 1165-1186, February.
    11. Tinglong Dai & Sridhar Tayur, 2020. "OM Forum—Healthcare Operations Management: A Snapshot of Emerging Research," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(5), pages 869-887, September.
    12. Rahul Kumar & Rahul Thakurta, 2025. "Classifying DSS Research – A Theoretical Framework," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 27(5), pages 1759-1788, October.
    13. Jae Hyeung Kang & James G. Matusik & Lizabeth A. Barclay, 2017. "Affective and Normative Motives to Work Overtime in Asian Organizations: Four Cultural Orientations from Confucian Ethics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 140(1), pages 115-130, January.
    14. Sheng Liu & Long He & Zuo-Jun Max Shen, 2021. "On-Time Last-Mile Delivery: Order Assignment with Travel-Time Predictors," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(7), pages 4095-4119, July.
    15. Athanasopoulos, George & Hyndman, Rob J. & Kourentzes, Nikolaos & Petropoulos, Fotios, 2017. "Forecasting with temporal hierarchies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(1), pages 60-74.
    16. Brandt, Tobias & Wagner, Sebastian & Neumann, Dirk, 2021. "Prescriptive analytics in public-sector decision-making: A framework and insights from charging infrastructure planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(1), pages 379-393.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael Samudra & Carla Van Riet & Erik Demeulemeester & Brecht Cardoen & Nancy Vansteenkiste & Frank E. Rademakers, 2016. "Scheduling operating rooms: achievements, challenges and pitfalls," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 19(5), pages 493-525, October.
    2. Huiqiao Su & Michael Pinedo & Guohua Wan, 2017. "Parallel machine scheduling with eligibility constraints: A composite dispatching rule to minimize total weighted tardiness," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(3), pages 249-267, April.
    3. Jinwen Ou & Xueling Zhong & Xiangtong Qi, 2016. "Scheduling parallel machines with inclusive processing set restrictions and job rejection," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 63(8), pages 667-681, December.
    4. Bertazzi, Luca & Maggioni, Francesca, 2018. "A stochastic multi-stage fixed charge transportation problem: Worst-case analysis of the rolling horizon approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(2), pages 555-569.
    5. Hans Kellerer & Joseph Y.‐T. Leung & Chung‐Lun Li, 2011. "Multiple subset sum with inclusive assignment set restrictions," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 58(6), pages 546-563, September.
    6. Shai Vardi & Alexandros Psomas & Eric Friedman, 2022. "Dynamic Fair Resource Division," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 47(2), pages 945-968, May.
    7. Shlomo Karhi & Dvir Shabtay, 2013. "On the optimality of the TLS algorithm for solving the online-list scheduling problem with two job types on a set of multipurpose machines," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 198-222, July.
    8. Abbas Al-Refaie & Toly Chen & Mays Judeh, 2018. "Optimal operating room scheduling for normal and unexpected events in a smart hospital," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 579-602, October.
    9. Li, Weidong & Ou, Jinwen, 2024. "Approximation algorithms for scheduling parallel machines with an energy constraint in green manufacturing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 314(3), pages 882-893.
    10. Jeroen Oostrum & Eelco Bredenhoff & Erwin Hans, 2010. "Suitability and managerial implications of a Master Surgical Scheduling approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 178(1), pages 91-104, July.
    11. repec:ipg:wpaper:2013-014 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Di Feng & Bettina Klaus, 2022. "Preference revelation games and strict cores of multiple‐type housing market problems," International Journal of Economic Theory, The International Society for Economic Theory, vol. 18(1), pages 61-76, March.
    13. Tsai, Shing Chih & Yeh, Yingchieh & Kuo, Chen Yun, 2021. "Efficient optimization algorithms for surgical scheduling under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(2), pages 579-593.
    14. Dominik Kress & Sebastian Meiswinkel & Erwin Pesch, 2018. "Mechanism design for machine scheduling problems: classification and literature overview," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 40(3), pages 583-611, July.
    15. Karsten Schwarz & Michael Römer & Taïeb Mellouli, 2019. "A data-driven hierarchical MILP approach for scheduling clinical pathways: a real-world case study from a German university hospital," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 12(2), pages 597-636, December.
    16. Cristian Mahulea & Liliana Mahulea & Juan Manuel García Soriano & José Manuel Colom, 2018. "Modular Petri net modeling of healthcare systems," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 329-357, June.
    17. repec:ipg:wpaper:14 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Tinglong Dai & Sridhar Tayur, 2020. "OM Forum—Healthcare Operations Management: A Snapshot of Emerging Research," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(5), pages 869-887, September.
    19. Boris Defourny & Damien Ernst & Louis Wehenkel, 2013. "Scenario Trees and Policy Selection for Multistage Stochastic Programming Using Machine Learning," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 25(3), pages 488-501, August.
    20. Sebastian Rachuba & Brigitte Werners, 2017. "A fuzzy multi-criteria approach for robust operating room schedules," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 251(1), pages 325-350, April.
    21. André Rossi & Alexis Aubry & Mireille Jacomino, 2011. "A sensitivity analysis to assess the completion time deviation for multi-purpose machines facing demand uncertainty," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 191(1), pages 219-249, November.
    22. Salma Makboul & Said Kharraja & Abderrahman Abbassi & Ahmed El Hilali Alaoui, 2022. "A two-stage robust optimization approach for the master surgical schedule problem under uncertainty considering downstream resources," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 63-88, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:60:y:2014:i:6:p:1552-1573. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.