IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navres/v64y2017i3p249-267.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Parallel machine scheduling with eligibility constraints: A composite dispatching rule to minimize total weighted tardiness

Author

Listed:
  • Huiqiao Su
  • Michael Pinedo
  • Guohua Wan

Abstract

We study a parallel machine scheduling problem, where a job j can only be processed on a specific subset of machines Mj, and the Mj subsets of the n jobs are nested. We develop a two‐phase heuristic for minimizing the total weighted tardiness subject to the machine eligibility constraints. In the first phase, we compute the factors and statistics that characterize a problem instance. In the second phase, we propose a new composite dispatching rule, the Apparent Tardiness Cost with Flexibility considerations (ATCF) rule, which is governed by several scaling parameters of which the values are determined by the factors obtained in the first phase. The ATCF rule is a generalization of the well‐known ATC rule which is very widely used in practice. We further discuss how to improve the dispatching rule using some simple but powerful properties without requiring additional computation time, and the improvement is quite satisfactory. We apply the Sequential Uniform Design Method to design our experiments and conduct an extensive computational study, and we perform tests on the performance of the ATCF rule using a real data set from a large hospital in China. We further compare its performance with that of the classical ATC rule. We also compare the schedules improved by the ATCF rule with what we believe are Near Optimal schedules generated by a general search procedure. The computational results show that especially with a low due date tightness, the ATCF rule performs significantly better than the well‐known ATC rule generating much improved schedules that are close to the Near Optimal schedules. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Naval Research Logistics 64: 249–267, 2017

Suggested Citation

  • Huiqiao Su & Michael Pinedo & Guohua Wan, 2017. "Parallel machine scheduling with eligibility constraints: A composite dispatching rule to minimize total weighted tardiness," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(3), pages 249-267, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:64:y:2017:i:3:p:249-267
    DOI: 10.1002/nav.21744
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.21744
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/nav.21744?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ari P. J. Vepsalainen & Thomas E. Morton, 1987. "Priority Rules for Job Shops with Weighted Tardiness Costs," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(8), pages 1035-1047, August.
    2. Jenny Chen & Michele Pfund & John Fowler & Douglas Montgomery & Thomas Callarman, 2010. "Robust scaling parameters for composite dispatching rules," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(11), pages 842-853.
    3. Huo, Yumei & Leung, Joseph Y.-T., 2010. "Parallel machine scheduling with nested processing set restrictions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 204(2), pages 229-236, July.
    4. Vladimir Krasik & Joseph Leung & Michael Pinedo & Jiawei Zhang, 2008. "Scheduling multiple products on parallel machines with setup costs," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 55(7), pages 654-669, October.
    5. Peng Si Ow & Thomas E. Morton, 1989. "The Single Machine Early/Tardy Problem," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 177-191, February.
    6. Leung, Joseph Y.-T. & Li, Chung-Lun, 2016. "Scheduling with processing set restrictions: A literature update," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 1-11.
    7. Hans Kellerer & Joseph Y.‐T. Leung & Chung‐Lun Li, 2011. "Multiple subset sum with inclusive assignment set restrictions," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 58(6), pages 546-563, September.
    8. Celia A. Glass & Hans Kellerer, 2007. "Parallel machine scheduling with job assignment restrictions," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(3), pages 250-257, April.
    9. Peter Brucker & Bernd Jurisch & Andreas Krämer, 1997. "Complexity of scheduling problems with multi-purpose machines," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 70(0), pages 57-73, April.
    10. Leung, Joseph Y.-T. & Li, Chung-Lun, 2008. "Scheduling with processing set restrictions: A survey," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(2), pages 251-262, December.
    11. Lee, Young Hoon & Pinedo, Michael, 1997. "Scheduling jobs on parallel machines with sequence-dependent setup times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 100(3), pages 464-474, August.
    12. Jinwen Ou & Joseph Y.‐T. Leung & Chung‐Lun Li, 2008. "Scheduling parallel machines with inclusive processing set restrictions," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 55(4), pages 328-338, June.
    13. Lin, Yang-Kuei & Fowler, John W. & Pfund, Michele E., 2013. "Multiple-objective heuristics for scheduling unrelated parallel machines," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 227(2), pages 239-253.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ferreira, Cristiane & Figueira, Gonçalo & Amorim, Pedro, 2022. "Effective and interpretable dispatching rules for dynamic job shops via guided empirical learning," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jinwen Ou & Xueling Zhong & Xiangtong Qi, 2016. "Scheduling parallel machines with inclusive processing set restrictions and job rejection," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 63(8), pages 667-681, December.
    2. André Rossi & Alexis Aubry & Mireille Jacomino, 2011. "A sensitivity analysis to assess the completion time deviation for multi-purpose machines facing demand uncertainty," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 191(1), pages 219-249, November.
    3. Ferreira, Cristiane & Figueira, Gonçalo & Amorim, Pedro, 2021. "Scheduling Human-Robot Teams in collaborative working cells," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    4. Kangbok Lee & Joseph Leung & Michael Pinedo, 2013. "Makespan minimization in online scheduling with machine eligibility," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 204(1), pages 189-222, April.
    5. Juntaek Hong & Kangbok Lee & Michael L. Pinedo, 2020. "Scheduling equal length jobs with eligibility restrictions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 285(1), pages 295-314, February.
    6. Li, Shuguang, 2017. "Parallel batch scheduling with inclusive processing set restrictions and non-identical capacities to minimize makespan," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(1), pages 12-20.
    7. Alidaee, Bahram & Kochenberger, Gary A. & Amini, Mohammad M., 2001. "Greedy solutions of selection and ordering problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(1), pages 203-215, October.
    8. Donghun Lee & Hyeongwon Kang & Dongjin Lee & Jeonwoo Lee & Kwanho Kim, 2023. "Deep Reinforcement Learning-Based Scheduler on Parallel Dedicated Machine Scheduling Problem towards Minimizing Total Tardiness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-14, February.
    9. Chuleeporn Kusoncum & Kanchana Sethanan & Richard F. Hartl & Thitipong Jamrus, 2022. "Modified differential evolution and heuristic algorithms for dump tippler machine allocation in a typical sugar mill in Thailand," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 5863-5895, November.
    10. Leung, Joseph Y.-T. & Li, Chung-Lun, 2016. "Scheduling with processing set restrictions: A literature update," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 1-11.
    11. Xi, Yue & Jang, Jaejin, 2012. "Scheduling jobs on identical parallel machines with unequal future ready time and sequence dependent setup: An experimental study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 137(1), pages 1-10.
    12. Xianglai Qi & Jinjiang Yuan, 2019. "Semi-Online Hierarchical Scheduling on Two Machines for lp-Norm Load Balancing," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 36(01), pages 1-16, February.
    13. Shim, Sang-Oh & Kim, Yeong-Dae, 2007. "Scheduling on parallel identical machines to minimize total tardiness," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(1), pages 135-146, February.
    14. Lin, Yang-Kuei & Fowler, John W. & Pfund, Michele E., 2013. "Multiple-objective heuristics for scheduling unrelated parallel machines," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 227(2), pages 239-253.
    15. Leung, Joseph Y-T. & Ng, C.T., 2017. "Fast approximation algorithms for uniform machine scheduling with processing set restrictions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(2), pages 507-513.
    16. Hans Kellerer & Joseph Y.‐T. Leung & Chung‐Lun Li, 2011. "Multiple subset sum with inclusive assignment set restrictions," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 58(6), pages 546-563, September.
    17. Dominik Kress & Sebastian Meiswinkel & Erwin Pesch, 2018. "Mechanism design for machine scheduling problems: classification and literature overview," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 40(3), pages 583-611, July.
    18. S-O Shim & Y-D Kim, 2007. "Minimizing total tardiness in an unrelated parallel-machine scheduling problem," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 58(3), pages 346-354, March.
    19. Mallik Angalakudati & Siddharth Balwani & Jorge Calzada & Bikram Chatterjee & Georgia Perakis & Nicolas Raad & Joline Uichanco, 2014. "Business Analytics for Flexible Resource Allocation Under Random Emergencies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(6), pages 1552-1573, June.
    20. Xianglai Qi & Jinjiang Yuan, 2017. "Semi-online hierarchical scheduling for $$l_p$$ l p -norm load balancing with buffer or rearrangements," 4OR, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 265-276, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:64:y:2017:i:3:p:249-267. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6750 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.