IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v204y2010i2p229-236.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Parallel machine scheduling with nested processing set restrictions

Author

Listed:
  • Huo, Yumei
  • Leung, Joseph Y.-T.

Abstract

We consider the problem of scheduling a set of n independent jobs on m parallel machines, where each job can only be scheduled on a subset of machines called its processing set. The machines are linearly ordered, and the processing set of job j is given by two machine indexes aj and bj; i.e., job j can only be scheduled on machines aj,aj+1,...,bj. Two distinct processing sets are either nested or disjoint. Preemption is not allowed. Our goal is to minimize the makespan. It is known that the problem is strongly NP-hard and that there is a list-type algorithm with a worst-case bound of 2-1/m. In this paper we give an improved algorithm with a worst-case bound of 7/4. For two and three machines, the algorithm gives a better worst-case bound of 5/4 and 3/2, respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Huo, Yumei & Leung, Joseph Y.-T., 2010. "Parallel machine scheduling with nested processing set restrictions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 204(2), pages 229-236, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:204:y:2010:i:2:p:229-236
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377-2217(09)00793-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Chung-Lun, 2006. "Scheduling unit-length jobs with machine eligibility restrictions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(2), pages 1325-1328, October.
    2. Li, Chung-Lun & Wang, Xiuli, 2010. "Scheduling parallel machines with inclusive processing set restrictions and job release times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(3), pages 702-710, February.
    3. Leung, Joseph Y.-T. & Li, Chung-Lun, 2008. "Scheduling with processing set restrictions: A survey," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(2), pages 251-262, December.
    4. Lin, Yixun & Li, Wenhua, 2004. "Parallel machine scheduling of machine-dependent jobs with unit-length," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(1), pages 261-266, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Leung, Joseph Y.-T. & Li, Chung-Lun, 2016. "Scheduling with processing set restrictions: A literature update," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 1-11.
    2. Kangbok Lee & Joseph Leung & Michael Pinedo, 2013. "Makespan minimization in online scheduling with machine eligibility," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 204(1), pages 189-222, April.
    3. Huiqiao Su & Michael Pinedo & Guohua Wan, 2017. "Parallel machine scheduling with eligibility constraints: A composite dispatching rule to minimize total weighted tardiness," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(3), pages 249-267, April.
    4. Epstein, Leah & Levin, Asaf, 2011. "Scheduling with processing set restrictions: PTAS results for several variants," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(2), pages 586-595, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Shuguang, 2017. "Parallel batch scheduling with inclusive processing set restrictions and non-identical capacities to minimize makespan," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(1), pages 12-20.
    2. Karhi, Shlomo & Shabtay, Dvir, 2014. "Online scheduling of two job types on a set of multipurpose machines," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 155-162.
    3. Lee, Kangbok & Hwang, Hark-Chin & Lim, Kyungkuk, 2014. "Semi-online scheduling with GoS eligibility constraints," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 204-214.
    4. Leung, Joseph Y.-T. & Li, Chung-Lun, 2016. "Scheduling with processing set restrictions: A literature update," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 1-11.
    5. Jinwen Ou & Xueling Zhong & Xiangtong Qi, 2016. "Scheduling parallel machines with inclusive processing set restrictions and job rejection," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 63(8), pages 667-681, December.
    6. Leung, Joseph Y-T. & Ng, C.T., 2017. "Fast approximation algorithms for uniform machine scheduling with processing set restrictions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(2), pages 507-513.
    7. Juntaek Hong & Kangbok Lee & Michael L. Pinedo, 2020. "Scheduling equal length jobs with eligibility restrictions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 285(1), pages 295-314, February.
    8. Leung, Joseph Y.-T. & Li, Chung-Lun, 2008. "Scheduling with processing set restrictions: A survey," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(2), pages 251-262, December.
    9. Li, Shuguang, 2017. "Approximation algorithms for scheduling jobs with release times and arbitrary sizes on batch machines with non-identical capacities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 263(3), pages 815-826.
    10. Epstein, Leah & Levin, Asaf, 2011. "Scheduling with processing set restrictions: PTAS results for several variants," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(2), pages 586-595, October.
    11. Chou, Yon-Chun & Lin, Yue-Lan & Chun, King-Fai, 2014. "A construction of knowledge rules for reactive planning of job-mix assignment to homogeneous serial batch machines," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 56-66.
    12. André Rossi & Alexis Aubry & Mireille Jacomino, 2011. "A sensitivity analysis to assess the completion time deviation for multi-purpose machines facing demand uncertainty," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 191(1), pages 219-249, November.
    13. Allaoui, Hamid & Artiba, AbdelHakim, 2009. "Johnson's algorithm: A key to solve optimally or approximately flow shop scheduling problems with unavailability periods," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(1), pages 81-87, September.
    14. Ferreira, Cristiane & Figueira, Gonçalo & Amorim, Pedro, 2021. "Scheduling Human-Robot Teams in collaborative working cells," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    15. Li, Chung-Lun, 2006. "Scheduling unit-length jobs with machine eligibility restrictions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(2), pages 1325-1328, October.
    16. Wang, Jun-Qiang & Leung, Joseph Y.-T., 2014. "Scheduling jobs with equal-processing-time on parallel machines with non-identical capacities to minimize makespan," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 325-331.
    17. Liao, Lu-Wen & Sheen, Gwo-Ji, 2008. "Parallel machine scheduling with machine availability and eligibility constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 184(2), pages 458-467, January.
    18. Jia, Zhao-hong & Li, Kai & Leung, Joseph Y.-T., 2015. "Effective heuristic for makespan minimization in parallel batch machines with non-identical capacities," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 1-10.
    19. Omri Dover & Dvir Shabtay, 2016. "Single machine scheduling with two competing agents, arbitrary release dates and unit processing times," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 238(1), pages 145-178, March.
    20. Chuleeporn Kusoncum & Kanchana Sethanan & Richard F. Hartl & Thitipong Jamrus, 2022. "Modified differential evolution and heuristic algorithms for dump tippler machine allocation in a typical sugar mill in Thailand," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 5863-5895, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:204:y:2010:i:2:p:229-236. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.