IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormksc/v44y2025i1p30-53.html

Can AI and AI-Hybrids Detect Persuasion Skills? Salesforce Hiring with Conversational Video Interviews

Author

Listed:
  • Ishita Chakraborty

    (University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706)

  • Khai Chiong

    (University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas 75080)

  • Howard Dover

    (University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas 75080)

  • K. Sudhir

    (Yale School of Management, New Haven, Connecticut 06511)

Abstract

We develop an AI and AI-human-based model for salesforce hiring using recordings of conversational video interviews that involve two-sided, back-and-forth interactions with messages conveyed through multiple modalities (text, voice, and body language). We derive objective, theory-backed measures of sales performance from these modalities, leveraging recent advances in body language analysis, conversational analysis, and large language models (LLMs). These measures serve as explanatory variables in our AI model. Our key contribution to the broader research on persuasion and influence is that we show how to use conversational videos to capture features related to (i) two-way conversational interactivity; (ii) real-time adaptation; and (iii) human body language, with minimal measurement error relative to extant survey-based approaches that suffer from recall biases. We use rubric-based scores by panels of sales professionals (correlated with hiring decisions) to isolate a candidate’s “latent sales ability” and use these as outcome variables to be predicted by the AI model. The AI model achieves reasonable predictive accuracy, yet incorporating human judgments into an AI-human hybrid model enhances its effectiveness—improving workforce quality by 67% over random selection. Although the content of what is spoken is most important in prediction, conversational interactivity, sellers’ real-time adaptation to the buyer, and body language also have good explanatory power. Finally, in terms of performance-cost trade-offs, the addition of just one human professional evaluation in the hiring loop in combination with AI is optimal. Further, using human input based on only the two early stages of the interview in a task-based hybrid model is the most cost-effective in improving performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Ishita Chakraborty & Khai Chiong & Howard Dover & K. Sudhir, 2025. "Can AI and AI-Hybrids Detect Persuasion Skills? Salesforce Hiring with Conversational Video Interviews," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(1), pages 30-53, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:44:y:2025:i:1:p:30-53
    DOI: 10.1287/mksc.2023.0149
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2023.0149
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mksc.2023.0149?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guillem Pros & Balász Kovács & Michael T. Hannan & Gaël Le Mens, 2023. "Uncovering the Semantics of Concepts Using GPT-4 and Other Recent Large Language Models," Working Papers 1394, Barcelona School of Economics.
    2. Shrum, L. J. & Lowrey, Tina M. & Pogacar, Ruth, 2018. "The Effects of Linguistic Devices on Consumer Information Processing and Persuasion: A Language Complexity × Processing Mode Framework," HEC Research Papers Series 1261, HEC Paris, revised 03 May 2018.
    3. Gaël Le Mens & Balász Kovács & Michael T. Hannan & Guillem Pros, 2023. "Uncovering the semantics of concepts using GPT-4 and Other recent large language models," Economics Working Papers 1864, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    4. David H. Autor & David Scarborough, 2008. "Does Job Testing Harm Minority Workers? Evidence from Retail Establishments," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 123(1), pages 219-277.
    5. Anna Lena Hunkenschroer & Christoph Luetge, 2022. "Ethics of AI-Enabled Recruiting and Selection: A Review and Research Agenda," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 178(4), pages 977-1007, July.
    6. Dimitrios Vamvourellis & M'at'e Toth & Snigdha Bhagat & Dhruv Desai & Dhagash Mehta & Stefano Pasquali, 2023. "Company Similarity using Large Language Models," Papers 2308.08031, arXiv.org.
    7. Black, J. Stewart & van Esch, Patrick, 2020. "AI-enabled recruiting: What is it and how should a manager use it?," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 63(2), pages 215-226.
    8. Mitchell Hoffman & Lisa B Kahn & Danielle Li, 2018. "Discretion in Hiring," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 133(2), pages 765-800.
    9. Xin (Shane) Wang & Shijie Lu & X I Li & Mansur Khamitov & Neil Bendle & J. Jeffrey Inman & Andrew T Stephen, 2021. "Audio Mining: The Role of Vocal Tone in Persuasion," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 48(2), pages 189-211.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Qiang Chen & Tianyang Han & Jin Li & Ye Luo & Zigan Wang & Yuxiao Wu & Xiaowei Zhang & Tuo Zhou, 2025. "Can AI Master Econometrics? Evidence from Econometrics AI Agent on Expert-Level Tasks," Papers 2506.00856, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2026.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Diana Moreira & Santiago Pérez, 2022. "Who Benefits from Meritocracy?," NBER Working Papers 30113, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Maude Lavanchy & Patrick Reichert & Jayanth Narayanan & Krishna Savani, 2023. "Applicants’ Fairness Perceptions of Algorithm-Driven Hiring Procedures," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 188(1), pages 125-150, November.
    3. Jonas Radbruch & Amelie Schiprowski, 2025. "Interview Sequences and the Formation of Subjective Assessments," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 92(2), pages 1226-1256.
    4. Andrew McGee & Peter McGee, 2024. "Whoever you want me to be: Personality and incentives," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 62(3), pages 1268-1291, July.
    5. Anders Frederiksen & Lisa B. Kahn & Fabian Lange, 2020. "Supervisors and Performance Management Systems," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 128(6), pages 2123-2187.
    6. Deriu, Valerio & Pozharliev, Rumen & De Angelis, Matteo, 2024. "How trust and attachment styles jointly shape job candidates’ AI receptivity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    7. Mitchell Hoffman & Christopher T. Stanton, 2024. "People, Practices, and Productivity: A Review of New Advances in Personnel Economics," NBER Working Papers 32849, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Brändle, Tobias & Grunau, Philipp & Haylock, Michael & Kampkötter, Patrick, 2020. "Recruitment strategies and match quality - New evidence from representative linked employer-employee data," University of Tübingen Working Papers in Business and Economics 134, University of Tuebingen, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, School of Business and Economics.
    9. Kässi, Otto & Lehdonvirta, Vili, 2018. "Do Digital Skill Certificates Help New Workers Enter the Market? Evidence from an Online Labour Platform," SocArXiv 7tybd, Center for Open Science.
    10. Eric Floyd & Sorabh Tomar & Daniel J. Lee, 2024. "Making the Grade (But Not Disclosing It): How Withholding Grades Affects Student Behavior and Employment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(4), pages 2497-2517, April.
    11. Marie-Pierre Dargnies & Rustamdjan Hakimov & Dorothea Kübler, 2025. "Behavioral Measures Improve AI Hiring: A Field Experiment," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 532, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
    12. Serge P. da Motta Veiga & Maria Figueroa-Armijos & Brent B. Clark, 2023. "Seeming Ethical Makes You Attractive: Unraveling How Ethical Perceptions of AI in Hiring Impacts Organizational Innovativeness and Attractiveness," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 186(1), pages 199-216, August.
    13. Bhuller, Manudeep & Kostøl, Andreas & Vigtel, Trond Christian, 2019. "How Broadband Internet Affects Labor Market Matching," Memorandum 10/2019, Oslo University, Department of Economics.
    14. Brenčič, Vera & McGee, Andrew, 2023. "Employers' Demand for Personality Traits," IZA Discussion Papers 16083, IZA Network @ LISER.
    15. Mocanu, Tatiana, 2024. "Designing Gender Equity: Evidence from Hiring Practices," IZA Discussion Papers 17480, IZA Network @ LISER.
    16. Bernd Irlenbusch & Holger A. Rau & Rainer Michael Rilke, 2026. "Human–AI Evaluation and Gender Transparency: Application Decisions in Competitive Hiring," ECONtribute Discussion Papers Series 398, University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany.
    17. Moshe A. Barach & John Horton, 2017. "How Do Employers Use Compensation History?: Evidence from a Field Experiment," CESifo Working Paper Series 6559, CESifo.
    18. Bhattacharya, D. & Shvets, J., 2022. "Inferring the Performance Diversity Trade-Off in University Admissions: Evidence from Cambridge," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2238, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    19. McGinnity, Frances & Quinn, Emma & McCullough, Evie & Enright, Shannen, 2021. "Measures to combat racial discrimination and promote diversity in the labour market: A review of evidence," Research Series, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), number SUSTAT110.
    20. Hermann, Erik & Puntoni, Stefano, 2024. "Artificial intelligence and consumer behavior: From predictive to generative AI," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:44:y:2025:i:1:p:30-53. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.