IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orisre/v26y2015i4p675-694.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Embarrassing Exposures in Online Social Networks: An Integrated Perspective of Privacy Invasion and Relationship Bonding

Author

Listed:
  • Ben C. F. Choi

    (School of Information Systems, Technology and Management, UNSW Australia Business School, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia)

  • Zhenhui (Jack) Jiang

    (Department of Information Systems, School of Computing, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117417)

  • Bo Xiao

    (Information Technology Management Department, Shidler College of Business, University of Hawai’i at Mānoa, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822)

  • Sung S. Kim

    (Wisconsin School of Business, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706)

Abstract

Online social networks greatly facilitate social exchange among friends. At times, for amusement, individuals may be targeted by friends’ playful teases, which often involve exposing individuals’ private embarrassing information, such as information that reveals their past indecent behavior, mischief, or clumsiness. Although individuals sometimes do enjoy the humor, they might also be offended by the involuntary exposure. Drawing on social exchange theory, this paper elucidates the consequences of an embarrassing exposure in online social networks. Specifically, this study examines the effects of information dissemination and network commonality on individuals’ exchange assessment as well as how this assessment shapes their behavioral responses. The results of our experiment provide strong evidence that information dissemination and network commonality jointly influence individuals’ perceived privacy invasion and perceived relationship bonding. In addition, whereas perceived privacy invasion increases transactional avoidance, it reduces approach behavior. Furthermore, whereas perceived relationship bonding impedes both transactional avoidance and interpersonal avoidance, it leads to approach behavior. The theoretical and practical implications of the findings are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Ben C. F. Choi & Zhenhui (Jack) Jiang & Bo Xiao & Sung S. Kim, 2015. "Embarrassing Exposures in Online Social Networks: An Integrated Perspective of Privacy Invasion and Relationship Bonding," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 26(4), pages 675-694, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:26:y:2015:i:4:p:675-694
    DOI: 10.1287/isre.2015.0602
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.2015.0602
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/isre.2015.0602?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sunil Wattal & Rahul Telang & Tridas Mukhopadhyay & Peter Boatwright, 2012. "What's in a “Name”? Impact of Use of Customer Information in E-Mail Advertisements," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(3-part-1), pages 679-697, September.
    2. Dahl, Darren W & Manchanda, Rajesh V & Argo, Jennifer J, 2001. "Embarrassment in Consumer Purchase: The Roles of Social Presence and Purchase Familiarity," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 28(3), pages 473-481, December.
    3. Catherine L. Anderson & Ritu Agarwal, 2011. "The Digitization of Healthcare: Boundary Risks, Emotion, and Consumer Willingness to Disclose Personal Health Information," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 22(3), pages 469-490, September.
    4. Tamara Dinev & Paul Hart, 2006. "An Extended Privacy Calculus Model for E-Commerce Transactions," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 17(1), pages 61-80, March.
    5. Zhenhui (Jack) Jiang & Cheng Suang Heng & Ben C. F. Choi, 2013. "Research Note —Privacy Concerns and Privacy-Protective Behavior in Synchronous Online Social Interactions," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 579-595, September.
    6. Huigang Liang & Yajiong Xue & Liansheng Wu, 2013. "Ensuring Employees' IT Compliance: Carrot or Stick?," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(2), pages 279-294, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Irina Heimbach & Oliver Hinz, 2018. "The Impact of Sharing Mechanism Design on Content Sharing in Online Social Networks," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 592-611, September.
    2. Cheng Yi & Zhenhui (Jack) Jiang & Izak Benbasat, 2017. "Designing for Diagnosticity and Serendipity: An Investigation of Social Product-Search Mechanisms," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(2), pages 413-429, June.
    3. Zike Cao & Kai-Lung Hui & Hong Xu, 2018. "An Economic Analysis of Peer Disclosure in Online Social Communities," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 546-566, September.
    4. Amit K. Srivastava & Rajhans Mishra, 2023. "Analyzing Social Media Research: A Data Quality and Research Reproducibility Perspective," IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, , vol. 12(1), pages 39-49, January.
    5. Kawaljeet Kaur Kapoor & Kuttimani Tamilmani & Nripendra P. Rana & Pushp Patil & Yogesh K. Dwivedi & Sridhar Nerur, 2018. "Advances in Social Media Research: Past, Present and Future," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 531-558, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tawfiq Alashoor & Mark Keil & H. Jeff Smith & Allen R. McConnell, 2023. "Too Tired and in Too Good of a Mood to Worry About Privacy: Explaining the Privacy Paradox Through the Lens of Effort Level in Information Processing," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(4), pages 1415-1436, December.
    2. Li, Jin & Zhang, Yulan & Mou, Jian, 2023. "Understanding information disclosures and privacy sensitivity on short-form video platforms: An empirical investigation," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    3. Xu, Zhuo, 2019. "An empirical study of patients' privacy concerns for health informatics as a service," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 297-306.
    4. Caroline Lancelot Miltgen & H. Jeff Smith, 2019. "Falsifying and withholding: exploring individuals’ contextual privacy-related decision-making," Post-Print hal-02156671, HAL.
    5. Jung, Yoonhyuk & Park, Jonghwa, 2018. "An investigation of relationships among privacy concerns, affective responses, and coping behaviors in location-based services," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 15-24.
    6. Tseng, Hsiao-Ting & Ibrahim, Fahad & Hajli, Nick & Nisar, Tahir M. & Shabbir, Haseeb, 2022. "Effect of privacy concerns and engagement on social support behaviour in online health community platforms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    7. Huarng, Kun-Huang & Yu, Tiffany Hui-Kuang & Lee, Cheng fang, 2022. "Adoption model of healthcare wearable devices," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    8. Hoon S. Choi & Darrell Carpenter & Myung S. Ko, 2022. "Risk Taking Behaviors Using Public Wi-Fi™," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 965-982, June.
    9. Zhenhui (Jack) Jiang & Cheng Suang Heng & Ben C. F. Choi, 2013. "Research Note —Privacy Concerns and Privacy-Protective Behavior in Synchronous Online Social Interactions," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 579-595, September.
    10. Sun, Shiwei & Zhang, Jin & Zhu, Yiwei & Jiang, Mian & Chen, Shuhui, 2022. "Exploring users' willingness to disclose personal information in online healthcare communities: The role of satisfaction," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    11. Renata Benigna Gonçalves & Júlio César Bastos Figueiredo, 2022. "Effects of perceived risks and benefits in the formation of the consumption privacy paradox: a study of the use of wearables in people practicing physical activities," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(3), pages 1485-1499, September.
    12. Nils Koester & Patrick Cichy & David Antons & Torsten Oliver Salge, 2022. "Perceived privacy risk in the Internet of Things: determinants, consequences, and contingencies in the case of connected cars," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(4), pages 2333-2355, December.
    13. Grosso, Monica & Castaldo, Sandro & Li, Hua (Ariel) & Larivière, Bart, 2020. "What Information Do Shoppers Share? The Effect of Personnel-, Retailer-, and Country-Trust on Willingness to Share Information," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 96(4), pages 524-547.
    14. Bleier, Alexander & Goldfarb, Avi & Tucker, Catherine, 2020. "Consumer privacy and the future of data-based innovation and marketing," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 466-480.
    15. Okazaki, Shintaro & Eisend, Martin & Plangger, Kirk & de Ruyter, Ko & Grewal, Dhruv, 2020. "Understanding the Strategic Consequences of Customer Privacy Concerns: A Meta-Analytic Review," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 96(4), pages 458-473.
    16. Huseyin Cavusoglu & Tuan Q. Phan & Hasan Cavusoglu & Edoardo M. Airoldi, 2016. "Assessing the Impact of Granular Privacy Controls on Content Sharing and Disclosure on Facebook," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(4), pages 848-879, December.
    17. Weiyin Hong & Frank K. Y. Chan & James Y. L. Thong, 2021. "Drivers and Inhibitors of Internet Privacy Concern: A Multidimensional Development Theory Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 168(3), pages 539-564, January.
    18. Felipe Thomaz & Carolina Salge & Elena Karahanna & John Hulland, 2020. "Learning from the Dark Web: leveraging conversational agents in the era of hyper-privacy to enhance marketing," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 43-63, January.
    19. Philipp A. Toussaint & Scott Thiebes & Manuel Schmidt-Kraepelin & Ali Sunyaev, 2022. "Perceived fairness of direct-to-consumer genetic testing business models," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(3), pages 1621-1638, September.
    20. Wang, Le & Yan, Jie & Lin, Jun & Cui, Wentian, 2017. "Let the users tell the truth: Self-disclosure intention and self-disclosure honesty in mobile social networking," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 1428-1440.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:26:y:2015:i:4:p:675-694. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.