IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orinte/v28y1998i2p80-98.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can't See the Forest Because of the Decision Trees: A Critique of Decision Analysis in Survey Texts

Author

Listed:
  • Kenneth Chelst

    (Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 48202)

Abstract

Introductory survey texts in operations research and management science have one or two chapters on decision analysis. They vary little from text to text in the topics covered, focusing largely on the analytic aspects of decision analysis. Their authors ignore key elements of decision analysis and the barriers to its use. As a result, they provide little insight as to how decision analysis is used in the real world as part of an intuition-building process and as a communication tool. In a critical review of their presentations, I identify crucial missing or cursorily reviewed topics and emphasize the need for a structured approach that incorporates probabilistic concepts and trade-offs amongst objectives. I present an annotated list of references and a new outline for a six-hour overview of decision analysis (not including multiple objectives) as part of a semester-long OR/MS survey course.

Suggested Citation

  • Kenneth Chelst, 1998. "Can't See the Forest Because of the Decision Trees: A Critique of Decision Analysis in Survey Texts," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 28(2), pages 80-98, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:28:y:1998:i:2:p:80-98
    DOI: 10.1287/inte.28.2.80
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.28.2.80
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/inte.28.2.80?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. F. V. Krumm & C. F. Rolle, 1992. "Management and Application of Decision and Risk Analysis in Du Pont," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 22(6), pages 84-93, December.
    2. Michael R. Walls & G. Thomas Morahan & James S. Dyer, 1995. "Decision Analysis of Exploration Opportunities in the Onshore US at Phillips Petroleum Company," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 25(6), pages 39-56, December.
    3. William E. Balson & Justin L. Welsh & Donald S. Wilson, 1992. "Using Decision Analysis and Risk Analysis to Manage Utility Environmental Risk," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 22(6), pages 126-139, December.
    4. David Cohan & Stephen M. Haas & David L. Radloff & Richard F. Yancik, 1984. "Using Fire in Forest Management: Decision Making Under Uncertainty," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 14(5), pages 8-19, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Donald L. Keefer & Craig W. Kirkwood & James L. Corner, 2004. "Perspective on Decision Analysis Applications, 1990–2001," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 1(1), pages 4-22, March.
    2. Zhou, P. & Ang, B.W. & Poh, K.L., 2006. "Decision analysis in energy and environmental modeling: An update," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(14), pages 2604-2622.
    3. Kleijnen, Jack P. C. & Gaury, Eric, 2003. "Short-term robustness of production management systems: A case study," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(2), pages 452-465, July.
    4. Kleijnen, J.P.C., 1995. "Sensitivity analysis and related analysis : A survey of statistical techniques," Other publications TiSEM bcf947da-25e3-431d-a1f6-6, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    5. Walls, Michael R & Clyman, Dana R, 1998. "Risky choice, risk sharing and decision analysis: Implications for managers in the resource sector," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 49-57, March.
    6. Kleijnen, Jack P. C., 1995. "Verification and validation of simulation models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 82(1), pages 145-162, April.
    7. Dana R. Clyman & Michael R. Walls & James S. Dyer, 1999. "Too Much of a Good Thing?," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 47(6), pages 957-965, December.
    8. Ben Ewing & Erin Baker, 2009. "Development of a Green Building Decision Support Tool: A Collaborative Process," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 6(3), pages 172-185, September.
    9. Jano-Ito, Marco A. & Crawford-Brown, Douglas, 2017. "Investment decisions considering economic, environmental and social factors: An actors' perspective for the electricity sector of Mexico," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 92-106.
    10. J. Eric Bickel, 2006. "Some Determinants of Corporate Risk Aversion," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 3(4), pages 233-251, December.
    11. Kun Zan & J. Eric Bickel, 2013. "Components of Portfolio Value of Information," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 10(2), pages 171-185, June.
    12. James E. Smith, 2004. "Risk Sharing, Fiduciary Duty, and Corporate Risk Attitudes," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 1(2), pages 114-127, June.
    13. Ali E. Abbas & James E. Matheson & Robert F. Bordley, 2009. "Effective utility functions induced by organizational target-based incentives," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(4), pages 235-251.
    14. M. Elisabeth Paté-Cornell & Robin L. Dillon, 2006. "The Respective Roles of Risk and Decision Analyses in Decision Support," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 3(4), pages 220-232, December.
    15. Wang, Q. & Poh, K.L., 2014. "A survey of integrated decision analysis in energy and environmental modeling," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 691-702.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:28:y:1998:i:2:p:80-98. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.