IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orinte/v25y1995i6p39-56.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decision Analysis of Exploration Opportunities in the Onshore US at Phillips Petroleum Company

Author

Listed:
  • Michael R. Walls

    (Division of Economics and Business, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado 80401)

  • G. Thomas Morahan

    (Phillips Petroleum Company, 1300-B Plaza Office Building, Bartlesville, Oklahoma 74004)

  • James S. Dyer

    (Department of Management Science and Information Systems, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712)

Abstract

Petroleum exploration managers must allocate scarce resources across a set of risky and uncertain investment alternatives. We developed a decision analysis software package, DISCOVERY, that provided an exploration division of Phillips Petroleum Company an alternative means of evaluating a mix of risky investments and selecting participation levels consistent with the firm’s risk propensity. Managers at Phillips use the software to (1) evaluate projects with a consistent risk-taking policy, (2) rank projects in terms of overall preference, (3) identify the firm’s appropriate level of participation, and (4) stay within their division budgets. This approach increased management’s awareness of risk and risk tolerance and provided insight into the relative financial risks associated with its available investment opportunities. As a result of this project, the company has developed consistent methods of risk analysis that include companywide analysis of all exploration projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael R. Walls & G. Thomas Morahan & James S. Dyer, 1995. "Decision Analysis of Exploration Opportunities in the Onshore US at Phillips Petroleum Company," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 25(6), pages 39-56, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:25:y:1995:i:6:p:39-56
    DOI: 10.1287/inte.25.6.39
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.25.6.39
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/inte.25.6.39?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jano-Ito, Marco A. & Crawford-Brown, Douglas, 2017. "Investment decisions considering economic, environmental and social factors: An actors' perspective for the electricity sector of Mexico," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 92-106.
    2. Ali E. Abbas & James E. Matheson & Robert F. Bordley, 2009. "Effective utility functions induced by organizational target-based incentives," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(4), pages 235-251.
    3. J. Eric Bickel, 2006. "Some Determinants of Corporate Risk Aversion," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 3(4), pages 233-251, December.
    4. Donald L. Keefer & Craig W. Kirkwood & James L. Corner, 2004. "Perspective on Decision Analysis Applications, 1990–2001," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 1(1), pages 4-22, March.
    5. Walls, Michael R & Clyman, Dana R, 1998. "Risky choice, risk sharing and decision analysis: Implications for managers in the resource sector," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 49-57, March.
    6. Kun Zan & J. Eric Bickel, 2013. "Components of Portfolio Value of Information," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 10(2), pages 171-185, June.
    7. Zhou, P. & Ang, B.W. & Poh, K.L., 2006. "Decision analysis in energy and environmental modeling: An update," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(14), pages 2604-2622.
    8. Kenneth Chelst, 1998. "Can't See the Forest Because of the Decision Trees: A Critique of Decision Analysis in Survey Texts," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 28(2), pages 80-98, April.
    9. James E. Smith, 2004. "Risk Sharing, Fiduciary Duty, and Corporate Risk Attitudes," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 1(2), pages 114-127, June.
    10. Dana R. Clyman & Michael R. Walls & James S. Dyer, 1999. "Too Much of a Good Thing?," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 47(6), pages 957-965, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:25:y:1995:i:6:p:39-56. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.