IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orijoc/v35y2023i5p986-1001.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Black-Box Attack-Based Security Evaluation Framework for Credit Card Fraud Detection Models

Author

Listed:
  • Jin Xiao

    (Business School, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610064, China)

  • Yuhang Tian

    (Business School, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610064, China)

  • Yanlin Jia

    (School of Sciences, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China)

  • Xiaoyi Jiang

    (Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Münster, Münster D-48149, Germany)

  • Lean Yu

    (Business School, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610064, China)

  • Shouyang Wang

    (School of Entrepreneurship and Management, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China)

Abstract

The security of credit card fraud detection (CCFD) models based on machine learning is important but rarely considered in the existing research. To this end, we propose a black-box attack-based security evaluation framework for CCFD models. Under this framework, the semisupervised learning technique and transfer-based black-box attack are combined to construct two versions of a semisupervised transfer black-box attack algorithm. Moreover, we introduce a new nonlinear optimization model to generate the adversarial examples against CCFD models and a security evaluation index to quantitatively evaluate the security of them. Computing experiments on two real data sets demonstrate that, facing the adversarial examples generated by the proposed attack algorithms, all six supervised models considered largely lose their ability to identify the fraudulent transactions, whereas the two unsupervised models are less affected. This indicates that the CCFD models based on supervised machine learning may possess substantial security risks. In addition, the evaluation results for the security of the models generate important managerial implications that help banks reasonably evaluate and enhance the model security.

Suggested Citation

  • Jin Xiao & Yuhang Tian & Yanlin Jia & Xiaoyi Jiang & Lean Yu & Shouyang Wang, 2023. "Black-Box Attack-Based Security Evaluation Framework for Credit Card Fraud Detection Models," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 35(5), pages 986-1001, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orijoc:v:35:y:2023:i:5:p:986-1001
    DOI: 10.1287/ijoc.2023.1297
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2023.1297
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/ijoc.2023.1297?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Douglas Heaven, 2019. "Why deep-learning AIs are so easy to fool," Nature, Nature, vol. 574(7777), pages 163-166, October.
    2. Namsik Chang & Olivia R. Liu Sheng, 2008. "Decision-Tree-Based Knowledge Discovery: Single- vs. Multi-Decision-Tree Induction," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 20(1), pages 46-54, February.
    3. J. Paul Brooks, 2011. "Support Vector Machines with the Ramp Loss and the Hard Margin Loss," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(2), pages 467-479, April.
    4. Anna Ye Du & Sanjukta Das & R. Ramesh, 2013. "Efficient Risk Hedging by Dynamic Forward Pricing: A Study in Cloud Computing," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 25(4), pages 625-642, November.
    5. Sanjukta Das & Anna Ye Du & Ram Gopal & R. Ramesh, 2011. "Risk Management and Optimal Pricing in Online Storage Grids," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 22(4), pages 756-773, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jian Luo & Shu-Cherng Fang & Zhibin Deng & Xiaoling Guo, 2016. "Soft Quadratic Surface Support Vector Machine for Binary Classification," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 33(06), pages 1-22, December.
    2. Michaela Sprenger & Tobias Mettler & Robert Winter, 0. "A viability theory for digital businesses: Exploring the evolutionary changes of revenue mechanisms to support managerial decisions," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-24.
    3. J. Paul Brooks & Eva K. Lee, 2014. "Solving a Multigroup Mixed-Integer Programming-Based Constrained Discrimination Model," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 26(3), pages 567-585, August.
    4. Rajib L. Saha & Sumanta Singha & Subodha Kumar, 2021. "Does Congestion Always Hurt? Managing Discount Under Congestion in a Game-Theoretic Setting," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 1347-1367, December.
    5. Chen, Huazhou & Chen, An & Xu, Lili & Xie, Hai & Qiao, Hanli & Lin, Qinyong & Cai, Ken, 2020. "A deep learning CNN architecture applied in smart near-infrared analysis of water pollution for agricultural irrigation resources," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    6. Shao-Bo Lin & Shaojie Tang & Yao Wang & Di Wang, 2022. "Toward Efficient Ensemble Learning with Structure Constraints: Convergent Algorithms and Applications," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(6), pages 3096-3116, November.
    7. Baldomero-Naranjo, Marta & Martínez-Merino, Luisa I. & Rodríguez-Chía, Antonio M., 2020. "Tightening big Ms in integer programming formulations for support vector machines with ramp loss," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(1), pages 84-100.
    8. Tobias Widmer & Paul Karaenke & Vijayan Sugumaran, 2021. "Two‐sided service markets: Effects of quality differentiation on market efficiency," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(3), pages 588-604, April.
    9. Blanquero, R. & Carrizosa, E. & Jiménez-Cordero, A. & Martín-Barragán, B., 2019. "Functional-bandwidth kernel for Support Vector Machine with Functional Data: An alternating optimization algorithm," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(1), pages 195-207.
    10. Ching-Chin Chern & Weng-U Lei & Kwei-Long Huang & Shu-Yi Chen, 2021. "A decision tree classifier for credit assessment problems in big data environments," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 363-386, March.
    11. Pietro Belotti & Pierre Bonami & Matteo Fischetti & Andrea Lodi & Michele Monaci & Amaya Nogales-Gómez & Domenico Salvagnin, 2016. "On handling indicator constraints in mixed integer programming," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 65(3), pages 545-566, December.
    12. Galaz, Victor & Centeno, Miguel A. & Callahan, Peter W. & Causevic, Amar & Patterson, Thayer & Brass, Irina & Baum, Seth & Farber, Darryl & Fischer, Joern & Garcia, David & McPhearson, Timon & Jimenez, 2021. "Artificial intelligence, systemic risks, and sustainability," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    13. Shuai Yuan & Sanjukta Das & R. Ramesh & Chunming Qiao, 2018. "Service Agreement Trifecta: Backup Resources, Price and Penalty in the Availability-Aware Cloud," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(4), pages 947-964, December.
    14. Kuo-Chih Cheng & Mu-Jung Huang & Cheng-Kai Fu & Kuo-Hua Wang & Huo-Ming Wang & Lan-Hui Lin, 2021. "Establishing a Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making Model for Stock Investment Decisions Using Data Mining Techniques," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-14, March.
    15. Xianning Wang & Zhengang Ma & Jiusheng Chen & Jingrong Dong, 2023. "Can Regional Eco-Efficiency Forecast the Changes in Local Public Health: Evidence Based on Statistical Learning in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-19, January.
    16. Pedro Duarte Silva, A., 2017. "Optimization approaches to Supervised Classification," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(2), pages 772-788.
    17. Michaela Sprenger & Tobias Mettler & Robert Winter, 2017. "A viability theory for digital businesses: Exploring the evolutionary changes of revenue mechanisms to support managerial decisions," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 899-922, August.
    18. Mingli Chen & Andreas Joseph & Michael Kumhof & Xinlei Pan & Xuan Zhou, 2021. "Deep Reinforcement Learning in a Monetary Model," Papers 2104.09368, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2023.
    19. Xianning Wang & Zhengang Ma & Jingrong Dong, 2021. "Quantitative Impact Analysis of Climate Change on Residents’ Health Conditions with Improving Eco-Efficiency in China: A Machine Learning Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-23, December.
    20. Mehdi Nezami & Kapil R. Tuli & Shantanu Dutta, 2022. "Shareholder wealth implications of software firms’ transition to cloud computing: a marketing perspective," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(3), pages 538-562, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orijoc:v:35:y:2023:i:5:p:986-1001. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.