IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orijoc/v34y2022i4p2106-2124.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adaptive Bundle Methods for Nonlinear Robust Optimization

Author

Listed:
  • Martina Kuchlbauer

    (Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Bavaria, Germany 91054)

  • Frauke Liers

    (Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Bavaria, Germany 91054)

  • Michael Stingl

    (Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Bavaria, Germany 91054)

Abstract

Currently, there are few theoretical or practical approaches available for general nonlinear robust optimization. Moreover, the approaches that do exist impose restrictive assumptions on the problem structure. We present an adaptive bundle method for nonlinear and nonconvex robust optimization problems with a suitable notion of inexactness in function values and subgradients. As the worst-case evaluation requires a global solution to the adversarial problem, it is a main challenge in a general nonconvex nonlinear setting. Moreover, computing elements of an ε -perturbation of the Clarke subdifferential in the ℓ 2 -norm sense is in general prohibitive for this class of problems. In this article, instead of developing an entirely new bundle concept, we demonstrate how existing approaches, such as Noll’s bundle method for nonconvex minimization with inexact information [Noll D (2013) Bundle method for non-convex minimization with inexact subgradients and function values. Computational and Analytical Mathematics, Springer Proceedings Mathematics , vol. 50 (Springer, New York), 555–592.] can be modified to be able to cope with this situation. Extending the nonconvex bundle concept to the case of robust optimization in this way, we prove convergence under two assumptions: first, that the objective function is lower C 1 and, second, that approximately optimal solutions to the adversarial maximization problem are available. The proposed method is, hence, applicable to a rather general setting of nonlinear robust optimization problems. In particular, we do not rely on a specific structure of the adversary’s constraints. The considered class of robust optimization problems covers the case that the worst-case adversary only needs to be evaluated up to a certain precision. One possibility to evaluate the worst case with the desired degree of precision is the use of techniques from mixed-integer linear programming. We investigate the procedure on some analytic examples. As applications, we study the gas transport problem under uncertainties in demand and in physical parameters that affect pressure losses in the pipes. Computational results for examples in large realistic gas network instances demonstrate the applicability as well as the efficiency of the method. Summary of Contribution: Nonlinear robust optimization is a relevant field of research as real-world optimization problems usually suffer from not precisely known parameters, for example, physical parameters that cannot be measured exactly. Currently, there are few theoretical or practical approaches available for general nonlinear robust optimization. Moreover, the methods that do exist impose restrictive assumptions on the problem structure. Writing nonlinear robust optimization tasks in minimax form, in principle, bundle methods can be used to solve the resulting nonsmooth problem. However, there are a number of difficulties to overcome. First, the inner adversarial problem needs to be solved to global optimality, which is a major challenge in a general nonconvex nonlinear setting. In order to cope with this, an adaptive solution approach, which allows for inexactness, is required. A second challenge is then that the computation of elements from an ε-neighborhood of the Clarke subdifferential is, in general, prohibitive. We show how an existing bundle concept by D. Noll for nonconvex problems with inexactness in function values and subgradients can be adapted to this situation. The resulting method only requires availability of approximate worst-case evaluations, and in particular, it does not rely on a specific structure of the adversarial constraints. To evaluate the worst case with the desired degree of precision, one possibility is the use of techniques from mixed-integer linear programming. In the course of the paper, we discuss convergence properties of the resulting method and demonstrate its efficiency by means of robust gas transport problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Martina Kuchlbauer & Frauke Liers & Michael Stingl, 2022. "Adaptive Bundle Methods for Nonlinear Robust Optimization," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(4), pages 2106-2124, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orijoc:v:34:y:2022:i:4:p:2106-2124
    DOI: 10.1287/ijoc.2021.1122
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2021.1122
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/ijoc.2021.1122?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stanislav Žaković & Berc Rustem, 2003. "Semi-Infinite Programming and Applications to Minimax Problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 124(1), pages 81-110, November.
    2. W. Hare & C. Sagastizábal & M. Solodov, 2016. "A proximal bundle method for nonsmooth nonconvex functions with inexact information," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 63(1), pages 1-28, January.
    3. Jian Lv & Li-Ping Pang & Fan-Yun Meng, 2018. "A proximal bundle method for constrained nonsmooth nonconvex optimization with inexact information," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 70(3), pages 517-549, March.
    4. Claudia Gotzes & Holger Heitsch & René Henrion & Rüdiger Schultz, 2016. "On the quantification of nomination feasibility in stationary gas networks with random load," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 84(2), pages 427-457, October.
    5. Jérôme Malick & Welington Oliveira & Sofia Zaourar, 2017. "Uncontrolled inexact information within bundle methods," EURO Journal on Computational Optimization, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 5(1), pages 5-29, March.
    6. Daniel Bienstock & Mauro Escobar & Claudio Gentile & Leo Liberti, 2022. "Mathematical programming formulations for the alternating current optimal power flow problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 314(1), pages 277-315, July.
    7. Haoxiang Yang & David P. Morton & Chaithanya Bandi & Krishnamurthy Dvijotham, 2021. "Robust Optimization for Electricity Generation," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 336-351, January.
    8. Manlio Gaudioso & Giovanni Giallombardo & Giovanna Miglionico, 2006. "An Incremental Method for Solving Convex Finite Min-Max Problems," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(1), pages 173-187, February.
    9. Stein, Oliver, 2012. "How to solve a semi-infinite optimization problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 223(2), pages 312-320.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. W. Ackooij & S. Demassey & P. Javal & H. Morais & W. Oliveira & B. Swaminathan, 2021. "A bundle method for nonsmooth DC programming with application to chance-constrained problems," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 78(2), pages 451-490, March.
    2. Xiaoliang Wang & Liping Pang & Qi Wu & Mingkun Zhang, 2021. "An Adaptive Proximal Bundle Method with Inexact Oracles for a Class of Nonconvex and Nonsmooth Composite Optimization," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-27, April.
    3. Tang, Chunming & Liu, Shuai & Jian, Jinbao & Ou, Xiaomei, 2020. "A multi-step doubly stabilized bundle method for nonsmooth convex optimization," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 376(C).
    4. Wim Ackooij & Nicolas Lebbe & Jérôme Malick, 2017. "Regularized decomposition of large scale block-structured robust optimization problems," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 393-421, July.
    5. Manlio Gaudioso & Giovanni Giallombardo & Giovanna Miglionico, 2018. "Minimizing Piecewise-Concave Functions Over Polyhedra," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 43(2), pages 580-597, May.
    6. Groetzner, Patrick & Werner, Ralf, 2022. "Multiobjective optimization under uncertainty: A multiobjective robust (relative) regret approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 296(1), pages 101-115.
    7. Jie Shen & Ya-Li Gao & Fang-Fang Guo & Rui Zhao, 2018. "A Redistributed Bundle Algorithm for Generalized Variational Inequality Problems in Hilbert Spaces," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 35(04), pages 1-18, August.
    8. Manlio Gaudioso & Giovanni Giallombardo & Giovanna Miglionico, 2020. "Essentials of numerical nonsmooth optimization," 4OR, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 1-47, March.
    9. Cao Thanh Tinh & Thai Doan Chuong, 2022. "Conic Linear Programming Duals for Classes of Quadratic Semi-Infinite Programs with Applications," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 194(2), pages 570-596, August.
    10. Duarte, Belmiro P.M. & Sagnol, Guillaume & Wong, Weng Kee, 2018. "An algorithm based on semidefinite programming for finding minimax optimal designs," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 99-117.
    11. P. Parpas & B. Rustem, 2009. "An Algorithm for the Global Optimization of a Class of Continuous Minimax Problems," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 141(2), pages 461-473, May.
    12. Fan-Yun Meng & Li-Ping Pang & Jian Lv & Jin-He Wang, 2017. "An approximate bundle method for solving nonsmooth equilibrium problems," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 68(3), pages 537-562, July.
    13. Alexander Mitsos & Angelos Tsoukalas, 2015. "Global optimization of generalized semi-infinite programs via restriction of the right hand side," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 61(1), pages 1-17, January.
    14. Tadeusz Antczak & Najeeb Abdulaleem, 2021. "E-differentiable minimax programming under E-convexity," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 300(1), pages 1-22, May.
    15. Welington Oliveira, 2019. "Proximal bundle methods for nonsmooth DC programming," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 75(2), pages 523-563, October.
    16. Johannes Thürauf, 2022. "Deciding the feasibility of a booking in the European gas market is coNP-hard," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 318(1), pages 591-618, November.
    17. Mengwei Xu & Soon-Yi Wu & Jane Ye, 2014. "Solving semi-infinite programs by smoothing projected gradient method," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 59(3), pages 591-616, December.
    18. Manlio Gaudioso & Giovanni Giallombardo & Giovanna Miglionico, 2015. "Optimal Replenishment Order Placement in a Finite Time Horizon," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 164(3), pages 1078-1089, March.
    19. Martina Kuchlbauer & Frauke Liers & Michael Stingl, 2022. "Outer Approximation for Mixed-Integer Nonlinear Robust Optimization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 195(3), pages 1056-1086, December.
    20. Soleimanian, Azam & Salmani Jajaei, Ghasemali, 2013. "Robust nonlinear optimization with conic representable uncertainty set," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 228(2), pages 337-344.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orijoc:v:34:y:2022:i:4:p:2106-2124. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.