IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v318y2022i1d10.1007_s10479-022-04732-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Deciding the feasibility of a booking in the European gas market is coNP-hard

Author

Listed:
  • Johannes Thürauf

    (Trier University)

Abstract

We show that deciding the feasibility of a booking (FB) in the European entry-exit gas market is coNP-hard if a nonlinear potential-based flow model is used. The feasibility of a booking can be characterized by polynomially many load flow scenarios with maximum potential-difference, which are computed by solving nonlinear potential-based flow models. We use this existing characterization of the literature to prove that FB is coNP-hard by reducing Partition to the infeasibility of a booking. We further prove that computing a potential-difference maximizing load flow scenario is $${\textsc {NP}}$$ NP -hard even if we can determine the flow direction a priori. From the literature, it is known that FB can be decided in polynomial time on trees and a single cycle. Thus, our hardness result draws the first line that separates the easy from the hard variants of FB and finally answers that FB is hard in general.

Suggested Citation

  • Johannes Thürauf, 2022. "Deciding the feasibility of a booking in the European gas market is coNP-hard," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 318(1), pages 591-618, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:318:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-022-04732-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-022-04732-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-022-04732-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-022-04732-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Veronika Grimm & Lars Schewe & Martin Schmidt & Gregor Zöttl, 2019. "A multilevel model of the European entry-exit gas market," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 89(2), pages 223-255, April.
    2. Martin Robinius & Lars Schewe & Martin Schmidt & Detlef Stolten & Johannes Thürauf & Lara Welder, 2019. "Robust optimal discrete arc sizing for tree-shaped potential networks," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 73(3), pages 791-819, July.
    3. T. D. Chuong & V. Jeyakumar, 2017. "An Exact Formula for Radius of Robust Feasibility of Uncertain Linear Programs," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 173(1), pages 203-226, April.
    4. Claudia Gotzes & Holger Heitsch & René Henrion & Rüdiger Schultz, 2016. "On the quantification of nomination feasibility in stationary gas networks with random load," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 84(2), pages 427-457, October.
    5. Roger Ríos-Mercado & Suming Wu & L. Scott & E. Boyd, 2002. "A Reduction Technique for Natural Gas Transmission Network Optimization Problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 117(1), pages 217-234, November.
    6. DE WOLF, Daniel & SMEERS, Yves, 2000. "The gas transmission problem solved by an extension of the simplex algorithm," LIDAM Reprints CORE 1489, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    7. Björn Geißler & Antonio Morsi & Lars Schewe & Martin Schmidt, 2018. "Solving Highly Detailed Gas Transport MINLPs: Block Separability and Penalty Alternating Direction Methods," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 30(2), pages 309-323, May.
    8. Daniel Rose & Martin Schmidt & Marc C. Steinbach & Bernhard M. Willert, 2016. "Computational optimization of gas compressor stations: MINLP models versus continuous reformulations," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 83(3), pages 409-444, June.
    9. Lars Schewe & Martin Schmidt & Johannes Thürauf, 2020. "Computing technical capacities in the European entry-exit gas market is NP-hard," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 295(1), pages 337-362, December.
    10. Pia Domschke & Bjorn Geißler & Oliver Kolb & Jens Lang & Alexander Martin & Antonio Morsi, 2011. "Combination of Nonlinear and Linear Optimization of Transient Gas Networks," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 605-617, November.
    11. Gorissen, Bram L. & Yanıkoğlu, İhsan & den Hertog, Dick, 2015. "A practical guide to robust optimization," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 124-137.
    12. Daniel De Wolf & Yves Smeers, 2000. "The Gas Transmission Problem Solved by an Extension of the Simplex Algorithm," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(11), pages 1454-1465, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lars Schewe & Martin Schmidt & Johannes Thürauf, 2020. "Computing technical capacities in the European entry-exit gas market is NP-hard," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 295(1), pages 337-362, December.
    2. Mengying Xue & Tianhu Deng & Zuo‐Jun Max Shen, 2019. "Optimizing natural gas pipeline transmission with nonuniform elevation: A new initialization approach," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 66(7), pages 547-564, October.
    3. Lars Schewe & Martin Schmidt & Johannes Thürauf, 2020. "Structural properties of feasible bookings in the European entry–exit gas market system," 4OR, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 197-218, June.
    4. Tianhu Deng & Yong Liang & Shixuan Zhang & Jingze Ren & Shuyi Zheng, 2019. "A Dynamic Programming Approach to Power Consumption Minimization in Gunbarrel Natural Gas Networks with Nonidentical Compressor Units," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 31(3), pages 593-611, July.
    5. Ríos-Mercado, Roger Z. & Borraz-Sánchez, Conrado, 2015. "Optimization problems in natural gas transportation systems: A state-of-the-art review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 536-555.
    6. Daniel de Wolf, 2017. "Mathematical Properties of Formulations of the Gas Transmission Problem," Post-Print halshs-02396747, HAL.
    7. Fränk Plein & Johannes Thürauf & Martine Labbé & Martin Schmidt, 2022. "A bilevel optimization approach to decide the feasibility of bookings in the European gas market," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 95(3), pages 409-449, June.
    8. Frédéric Babonneau & Yurii Nesterov & Jean-Philippe Vial, 2012. "Design and Operations of Gas Transmission Networks," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(1), pages 34-47, February.
    9. Lars Schewe & Martin Schmidt & Johannes Thürauf, 2022. "Global optimization for the multilevel European gas market system with nonlinear flow models on trees," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 82(3), pages 627-653, March.
    10. Li, Bei & Roche, Robin, 2020. "Optimal scheduling of multiple multi-energy supply microgrids considering future prediction impacts based on model predictive control," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    11. Liang, Yingzong & Hui, Chi Wai, 2018. "Convexification for natural gas transmission networks optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 1001-1016.
    12. Ralf Lenz & Kai Helge Becker, 2022. "Optimization of capacity expansion in potential-driven networks including multiple looping: a comparison of modelling approaches," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 44(1), pages 179-224, March.
    13. Martin Schmidt & Denis Aßmann & Robert Burlacu & Jesco Humpola & Imke Joormann & Nikolaos Kanelakis & Thorsten Koch & Djamal Oucherif & Marc E. Pfetsch & Lars Schewe & Robert Schwarz & Mathias Sirvent, 2017. "GasLib—A Library of Gas Network Instances," Data, MDPI, vol. 2(4), pages 1-18, December.
    14. Beyza, Jesus & Ruiz-Paredes, Hector F. & Garcia-Paricio, Eduardo & Yusta, Jose M., 2020. "Assessing the criticality of interdependent power and gas systems using complex networks and load flow techniques," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 540(C).
    15. Beck, Yasmine & Ljubić, Ivana & Schmidt, Martin, 2023. "A survey on bilevel optimization under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(2), pages 401-426.
    16. Conrado Borraz-Sánchez & Dag Haugland, 2013. "Optimization methods for pipeline transportation of natural gas with variable specific gravity and compressibility," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 21(3), pages 524-541, October.
    17. Zhou, Li & Liao, Zuwei & Wang, Jingdai & Jiang, Binbo & Yang, Yongrong & Du, Wenli, 2015. "Energy configuration and operation optimization of refinery fuel gas networks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 365-375.
    18. Hong, Sung-Pil & Kim, Taegyoon & Lee, Subin, 2019. "A precision pump schedule optimization for the water supply networks with small buffers," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 24-37.
    19. Dieckhoener, Caroline, 2010. "Simulating security of supply effects of the Nabucco and South Stream projects for the European natural gas market," EWI Working Papers 2010-7, Energiewirtschaftliches Institut an der Universitaet zu Koeln (EWI), revised 21 Jan 2012.
    20. Song, Chenhui & Xiao, Jun & Zu, Guoqiang & Hao, Ziyuan & Zhang, Xinsong, 2021. "Security region of natural gas pipeline network system: Concept, method and application," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:318:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-022-04732-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.