IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jkm000/v17y2021i3p1-19.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Knowledge Sharing in Catholic Organizations: A Fuzzy‐Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Carla Curado

    (ISEG, Lisbon School of Economics and Management, Portugal)

  • João Graça

    (ISEG, Lisbon School of Economics and Management, Portugal)

  • Mírian Oliveira

    (Escola de Negócios, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil & ISEG, Lisbon School of Economics and Management, Portugal)

  • Alexandra Fernandes

    (ISEG, Lisbon School of Economics and Management, Portugal)

Abstract

This study examines knowledge sharing in Catholic organizations. The authors adopt Schein's organizational culture theory that facilitates, or inhibits, knowledge sharing in organizations. Thus, they address the phenomenon at the three levels: the artifacts, the norms and values, and the underlying assumptions. Considering the chosen settings, they study the contributions of individuals having taken vows, the organizational rituals, the significance, and the sense of community perceived by the organizational members. Data were gathered using a survey and were analyzed by using a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. The study provides the causal configurations of conditions that lead to tacit, explicit, and total knowledge sharing. They also offer the causal configurations of conditions that lead to the absence of each kind of knowledge sharing. Given that the qualitative results cannot be generalized, the study can still be replicated in organizations without restrictions.

Suggested Citation

  • Carla Curado & João Graça & Mírian Oliveira & Alexandra Fernandes, 2021. "Knowledge Sharing in Catholic Organizations: A Fuzzy‐Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis," International Journal of Knowledge Management (IJKM), IGI Global, vol. 17(3), pages 1-19, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:igg:jkm000:v:17:y:2021:i:3:p:1-19
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJKM.2021070103
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carla Curado & Nick Bontis, 2006. "The knowledge-based view of the firm and its theoretical precursor," International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(4), pages 367-381.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maciej Zastempowski & Waldemar Glabiszewski & Krzysztof Krukowski & Szymon Cyfert, 2020. "Technological Innovation Capabilities of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 460-474.
    2. Anna Maria Biscotti & Eugenio D’Amico, 2019. "Does Equity Market Differently Perceive IC Management and Disclosure Behaviours?," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 10(2), pages 756-775, June.
    3. Behl, Abhishek & Jayawardena, Nirma & Ishizaka, Alessio & Gupta, Manish & Shankar, Amit, 2022. "Gamification and gigification: A multidimensional theoretical approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1378-1393.
    4. Muhammad Ali Butt & Faisal Nawaz & Saddam Hussain & Maria José Sousa & Minhong Wang & Muhammad Saleem Sumbal & Muhammad Shujahat, 2019. "Individual knowledge management engagement, knowledge-worker productivity, and innovation performance in knowledge-based organizations: the implications for knowledge processes and knowledge-based sys," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 336-356, September.
    5. Paulo Lopes Henriques & Carla Curado & Mírian Oliveira & Antônio Carlos Gastaud Maçada, 2019. "Publishing? You can count on knowledge, experience, and expectations," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 53(3), pages 1301-1324, May.
    6. Goumagias, Nikolaos & Fernandes, Kiran Jude & Nucciarelli, Alberto & Li, Feng, 2022. "How to overcome path dependency through resource reconfiguration," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 78-91.
    7. Pervin Ersoy & Gülmüş Börühan & Sachin Kumar Mangla & Jorge Hernandez Hormazabal & Yigit Kazancoglu & Çisem Lafcı, 2022. "Impact of information technology and knowledge sharing on circular food supply chains for green business growth," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 1875-1904, July.
    8. Magdalena Marczewska & Adrianna Jaskanis & Mariusz Kostrzewski, 2020. "Knowledge, Competences and Competitive Advantage of the Green-Technology Companies in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-19, October.
    9. Shujahat, Muhammad & Sousa, Maria José & Hussain, Saddam & Nawaz, Faisal & Wang, Minhong & Umer, Muhammad, 2019. "Translating the impact of knowledge management processes into knowledge-based innovation: The neglected and mediating role of knowledge-worker productivity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 442-450.
    10. Bertello, Alberto & De Bernardi, Paola & Santoro, Gabriele & Quaglia, Roberto, 2022. "Unveiling the microfoundations of multiplex boundary work for collaborative innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1424-1434.
    11. Marco Arraya, 2016. "Resource categories and performance in Portuguese non-profit sports clubs," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 13(Special I), pages 80-101, November.
    12. Cuthbertson, Richard W. & Furseth, Peder Inge, 2022. "Digital services and competitive advantage: Strengthening the links between RBV, KBV, and innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 168-176.
    13. Demetris Vrontis & Ranjan Chaudhuri & Sheshadri Chatterjee, 2023. "Role of ChatGPT and Skilled Workers for Business Sustainability: Leadership Motivation as the Moderator," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-14, August.
    14. Mark P. Sallos & Esin Yoruk & Alexeis García-Pérez, 2017. "A business process improvement framework for knowledge-intensive entrepreneurial ventures," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 42(2), pages 354-373, April.
    15. Paula Benevene & Ilaria Buonomo & Eric Kong & Martina Pansini & Maria Luisa Farnese, 2021. "Management of Green Intellectual Capital: Evidence-Based Literature Review and Future Directions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-22, July.
    16. Patel, Parth & Varma, Arup & Sengupta, Santoshi & Prikshat, Verma & Park, HyunMi, 2022. "The international training of expatriates in Western subsidiaries of emerging multinational enterprises: A knowledge-based perspective," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 28(1).
    17. Aleena Syed & Humna Sohail & Sarmad Ejaz & Hafiz Ahmed Ullah, 2020. "Direct and Indirect effect of Knowledge Management Practices on Firm Innovation via Knowledge Application," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 10(4), pages 110-118.
    18. Sara Scipioni & Meir Russ & Federico Niccolini, 2021. "From Barriers to Enablers: The Role of Organizational Learning in Transitioning SMEs into the Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-31, January.
    19. Vu Minh Ngo & Huan Huu Nguyen & Hiep Cong Pham & Hung Manh Nguyen & Phuc Vinh Dang Truong, 2023. "Digital supply chain transformation: effect of firm’s knowledge creation capabilities under COVID-19 supply chain disruption risk," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 1003-1018, June.
    20. Pereira, Vijay & Bamel, Umesh, 2021. "Extending the resource and knowledge based view: A critical analysis into its theoretical evolution and future research directions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 557-570.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jkm000:v:17:y:2021:i:3:p:1-19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.