IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/idn/journl/v28y2025ispep41-70.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Influential Are Digital Technologies On Good Governance And Quality Institutions In Asean?

Author

Listed:
  • Ismail Aremu Muhammed

    (Universiti Brunei Darussalam)

  • Ahmed Masood Khalid

    (Lahore University of Management Sciences)

  • Gamini Premaratne

    (Universiti Brunei Darussalam)

Abstract

How do Digital Technologies (DT) affect the quality of governance and institutions in ASEAN? We address this question through employing a panel data technique on 10 ASEAN countries over the period between 1996 and 2022. The findings reveal that DT are influential in the quality of governance and institutions in these countries. Specifically, fixed broadband subscriptions, individuals using the internet, and mobile cellular subscriptions are vital in promoting good governance and quality institutions in ASEAN. Moreover, government effectiveness and rule of law responded and improved more significantly with the development of DT. It was concluded that effective government policy and sound rule of law in ASEAN is achieved when the development of DT is prioritized, especially those technologies that help to lessen the bureaucratic bottlenecks encountered in the public sector and those that improve the transparency of government policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Ismail Aremu Muhammed & Ahmed Masood Khalid & Gamini Premaratne, 2025. "How Influential Are Digital Technologies On Good Governance And Quality Institutions In Asean?," Bulletin of Monetary Economics and Banking, Bank Indonesia, vol. 28(Spesial I), pages 41-70, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:idn:journl:v:28:y:2025:i:spe:p:41-70
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.59091/2460-9196.2373
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://bulletin.bmeb-bi.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2373&context=bmeb
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.59091/2460-9196.2373?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gan, Tian & Zhang, Mingxin & Zhang, Zhiqiang, 2023. "The impact of digital government policy on entrepreneurial activity in China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 479-496.
    2. Robert J. Barro, 1998. "Determinants of Economic Growth: A Cross-Country Empirical Study," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262522543, December.
    3. Islam, Nihal & Trautmann, Katrin & Buxmann, Peter, 2016. "Tradition Meets Modernity - Learning from Start-ups as a Chance to Create Digital Innovation in Corporations," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 84455, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    4. Rauch, James E. & Evans, Peter B., 2000. "Bureaucratic structure and bureaucratic performance in less developed countries," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(1), pages 49-71, January.
    5. Islam, Nihal & Trautmann, Katrin & Buxmann, Peter, 2016. "Tradition Meets Modernity - Learning from Start-ups as a Chance to Create Digital Innovation in Corporations," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 84450, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    6. Islam, Nihal & Trautmann, Katrin & Buxmann, Peter, 2016. "Tradition Meets Modernity - Learning from Start-ups as a Chance to Create Digital Innovation in Corporations," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 84210, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    7. Khalid Adnan Saeed, 2022. "Determinants of institutional quality and per capita growth in natural resource-dependent countries," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 2122189-212, December.
    8. Glaeser, Edward L. & Saks, Raven E., 2006. "Corruption in America," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(6-7), pages 1053-1072, August.
    9. Sergei Guriev & Nikita Melnikov & Ekaterina Zhuravskaya, 2021. "3G Internet and Confidence in Government," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 136(4), pages 2533-2613.
    10. Islam, Nihal & Trautmann, Katrin & Buxmann, Peter, 2016. "Tradition Meets Modernity - Learning from Start-ups as a Chance to Create Digital Innovation in Corporations," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 84211, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    11. Islam, Nihal & Trautmann, Katrin & Buxmann, Peter, 2016. "Tradition Meets Modernity - Learning from Start-ups as a Chance to Create Digital Innovation in Corporations," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 84451, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    12. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/5744igqofr9qr9hjd2eiomr7qc is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Easterly, William, 2001. "The Middle Class Consensus and Economic Development," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 6(4), pages 317-335, December.
    14. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/5744igqofr9qr9hjd2eiomr7qc is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Bird, Richard M. & Zolt, Eric M., 2008. "Technology and Taxation in Developing Countries: From Hand to Mouse," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 61(4), pages 791-821, December.
    16. Grabowski, Richard & Self, Sharmistha, 2020. "What factors influence the quality of governance institutions? An Asian perspective," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    17. Svenja Falk & Andrea Römmele & Michael Silverman, 2017. "The Promise of Digital Government," Springer Books, in: Svenja Falk & Andrea Römmele & Michael Silverman (ed.), Digital Government, pages 3-23, Springer.
    18. Rinaldo Evangelista & Paolo Guerrieri & Valentina Meliciani, 2014. "The economic impact of digital technologies in Europe," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(8), pages 802-824, November.
    19. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/5744igqofr9qr9hjd2eiomr7qc is not listed on IDEAS
    20. repec:hal:wpspec:info:hdl:2441/5744igqofr9qr9hjd2eiomr7qc is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Islam, Nihal & Trautmann, Katrin & Buxmann, Peter, 2016. "Tradition Meets Modernity - Learning from Start-ups as a Chance to Create Digital Innovation in Corporations," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 84287, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    22. Islam, Roumeen & Montenegro, Claudio E., 2002. "What determines the quality of institutions?," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2764, The World Bank.
    23. Mushtaq H. Khan, 2009. "Governance, Growth and Poverty Reduction," Working Papers 75, United Nations, Department of Economics and Social Affairs.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. World Bank, 2024. "Cross-Country Empirical Analysis of GovTech Platforms on Citizen Engagement," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10716, The World Bank.
    2. José Antonio Alonso & Carlos Garcimartín & Luis Rivas, 2011. "Taxes, Foreign Aid and Quality of Governance Institutions," Chapters, in: Mehmet Ugur & David Sunderland (ed.), Does Economic Governance Matter?, chapter 7, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. José Antonio Alonso & Carlos Garcimartín, 2013. "The Determinants Of Institutional Quality. More On The Debate," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(2), pages 206-226, March.
    4. Ioan POPESCU, 2012. "Institutional quality: criteria, determinants and benefits," THE YEARBOOK OF THE "GH. ZANE" INSTITUTE OF ECONOMIC RESEARCHES, Gheorghe Zane Institute for Economic and Social Research ( from THE ROMANIAN ACADEMY, JASSY BRANCH), vol. 21(1), pages 59-65.
    5. José Antonio Alonso & Carlos Garcimartín, 2011. "Does Aid Hinder Tax Efforts? More Evidence," Discussion Papers 11/04, University of Nottingham, CREDIT.
    6. Hossein Mirshojaeian Hosseini & Shinji Kaneko, 2012. "Spatial Spillover of Governance and Institutional Quality: A Spatial Econometric Approach," IDEC DP2 Series 2-3, Hiroshima University, Graduate School for International Development and Cooperation (IDEC).
    7. Ghulam Rasool Madni, 2019. "Probing Institutional Quality Through Ethnic Diversity, Income Inequality and Public Spending," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 142(2), pages 581-595, April.
    8. Ahmet Faruk AYSAN & Mustapha Kamel NABLI & Marie‐Ange VÉGANZONÈS‐VAROUDAKIS, 2007. "Governance Institutions And Private Investment: An Application To The Middle East And North Africa," The Developing Economies, Institute of Developing Economies, vol. 45(3), pages 339-377, September.
    9. Sharmistha Self & Richard Grabowski, 2006. "Agricultural Development, State Effectiveness And Long-Run Economic Development," Journal of Economic Development, Chung-Ang Unviersity, Department of Economics, vol. 31(2), pages 73-90, December.
    10. Soeren C. Schwuchow, 2023. "Organized crime as a link between inequality and corruption," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 469-509, June.
    11. Günther G. Schulze & Bambang Suharnoko Sjahrir & Nikita Zakharov, 2016. "Corruption in Russia," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 59(1), pages 135-171.
    12. Daron Acemoglu & Davide Ticchi & Andrea Vindigni, 2011. "Emergence And Persistence Of Inefficient States," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 9(2), pages 177-208, April.
    13. Roumeen Islam, 2006. "Does More Transparency Go Along With Better Governance?," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(2), pages 121-167, July.
    14. Maximiliano Lauletta & Martín A. Rossi & Christian A. Ruzzier, 2022. "Audits and Government Hiring Practices," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 89(353), pages 214-227, January.
    15. Konstantinos Angelopoulos & George Economides, 2008. "Fiscal policy, rent seeking, and growth under electoral uncertainty: theory and evidence from the OECD," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(4), pages 1375-1405, November.
    16. Fahad Khalid, 2019. "Literature Review on Social Cohesion and Economic Growth," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 3(4), pages 39-60.
    17. Dang, Duc Anh, 2013. "How foreign direct investment promote institutional quality: Evidence from Vietnam," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(4), pages 1054-1072.
    18. Aysan, Ahmet Faruk & Nabli, Mustapha Kamel & Veganzones-Varoudakis, Marie-Ange, 2006. "Governance and private investment in the Middle East and North Africa," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3934, The World Bank.
    19. B. Heller, William & P. Kyriacou, Andreas & Roca-Sagalés, Oriol, 2014. "Legislative Vetoes and Corruption: The Effect of Formal Checks on Governance," MPRA Paper 61651, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Peter Ego Ayunku, 2018. "The Nexus between Financial Sector Development and Economic Growth in Nigeria: A Cointergration Approach," Noble International Journal of Social Sciences Research, Noble Academic Publsiher, vol. 3(8), pages 55-70, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Digital technologies; Good governance; Institutional quality; ASEAN;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H11 - Public Economics - - Structure and Scope of Government - - - Structure and Scope of Government
    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
    • O38 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:idn:journl:v:28:y:2025:i:spe:p:41-70. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lutzardo Tobing The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Lutzardo Tobing to update the entry or send us the correct address or Jimmy Kathon (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bigovid.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.