IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/masjnl/v3y2009i10p89.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Chance-constrained Programming Model for Portfolio Selection in Uncertain Environment

Author

Listed:
  • Limei Yan

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to solve the portfolio problem when security returns are uncertain variables. Two types of portfolio selection programming models based on uncertain measure are provided according to uncertain theory. Since the proposed optimization problems are generally difficult to solve by conventional methods, the models are converted to their crisp equivalents when the return rates are adopted some special uncertain variables such as linear uncertain variable, trapezoidal uncertain variable and normal uncertain variable. Thus the transformed models can be completed by the conventional methods. In the end of the paper, one numerical experiment is provided to illustrate the effectiveness of the method.

Suggested Citation

  • Limei Yan, 2009. "Chance-constrained Programming Model for Portfolio Selection in Uncertain Environment," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 3(10), pages 1-89, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:masjnl:v:3:y:2009:i:10:p:89
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/mas/article/download/3978/3525
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/mas/article/view/3978
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Huang, Xiaoxia, 2007. "Two new models for portfolio selection with stochastic returns taking fuzzy information," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 180(1), pages 396-405, July.
    2. Huang, Xiaoxia, 2008. "Portfolio selection with a new definition of risk," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(1), pages 351-357, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Akhter Mohiuddin Rather & V. N. Sastry & Arun Agarwal, 2017. "Stock market prediction and Portfolio selection models: a survey," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 54(3), pages 558-579, September.
    2. Wei Chen, 2009. "Weighted portfolio selection models based on possibility theory," Fuzzy Information and Engineering, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 115-127, June.
    3. Joëts, Marc, 2015. "Heterogeneous beliefs, regret, and uncertainty: The role of speculation in energy price dynamics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(1), pages 204-215.
    4. Limei Yan, 2009. "Optimal Portfolio Selection Models with Uncertain Returns," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 3(8), pages 1-76, August.
    5. Levy, Haim & Levy, Moshe, 2014. "The benefits of differential variance-based constraints in portfolio optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 234(2), pages 372-381.
    6. Takashi Hasuike & Mukesh Kumar Mehlawat, 2018. "Investor-friendly and robust portfolio selection model integrating forecasts for financial tendency and risk-averse," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 269(1), pages 205-221, October.
    7. Mohamed El Hedi Arouri & Christophe Rault & Ana Maria Sova & Robert Sova & Frédéric Teulon, 2013. "Market Structure and the Cost of Capital," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-00798048, HAL.
    8. Lord Mensah, 2016. "Asset Allocation Brewed Accross African Stock Markets," Proceedings of Economics and Finance Conferences 3205757, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    9. Smimou, K., 2014. "International portfolio choice and political instability risk: A multi-objective approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 234(2), pages 546-560.
    10. Piasecki, Krzysztof, 2011. "Effectiveness of securities with fuzzy probabilistic return," MPRA Paper 46214, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Hasuike, Takashi & Ishii, Hiroaki, 2009. "On flexible product-mix decision problems under randomness and fuzziness," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 770-787, August.
    12. Krzysztof Piasecki & Joanna Siwek, 2018. "The portfolio problem with present value modelled by a discrete trapezoidal fuzzy number," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 28(1), pages 57-74.
    13. Sévi, Benoît, 2014. "Forecasting the volatility of crude oil futures using intraday data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(3), pages 643-659.
    14. Esther Mohr & Robert Dochow, 2017. "Risk management strategies for finding universal portfolios," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 256(1), pages 129-147, September.
    15. El Hedi Arouri, Mohamed & Rault, Christophe & Sova, Anamaria & Sova, Robert & Teulon, Frédéric, 2013. "Market structure and the cost of capital," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 664-671.
    16. Wei Chen & Yun Wang & Mukesh Kumar Mehlawat, 2018. "A hybrid FA–SA algorithm for fuzzy portfolio selection with transaction costs," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 269(1), pages 129-147, October.
    17. Caiyu Jiang & Jianhua Wang, 2022. "A Portfolio Model with Risk Control Policy Based on Deep Reinforcement Learning," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, December.
    18. Florentina Paraschiv & Dima Mohamad, 2020. "The Nuclear Power Dilemma—Between Perception and Reality," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-19, November.
    19. Li, Bo & Li, Xiangfa & Teo, Kok Lay & Zheng, Peiyao, 2022. "A new uncertain random portfolio optimization model for complex systems with downside risks and diversification," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    20. Krzysztof M. Piasecki, 2011. "Effectiveness of securities with fuzzy probabilistic return," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 21(2), pages 65-78.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:masjnl:v:3:y:2009:i:10:p:89. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.