IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/masjnl/v12y2018i8p103.html

Evaluation of Road Infrastructure Alternatives Through a Saving Gradient in Travel Times. Case Study: Second Connection Villamaría-Manizales, Colombia

Author

Listed:
  • Diego Alexander Escobar
  • Santiago Cardona
  • Carlos Alberto Moncada

Abstract

In the last century, the migration of people from rural to urban areas of cities has generated a set of dynamics in different sectors such as social, economic, educational that have led cities to collaborate among them, generating a constant synergy in order to obtain a sustained development in multiple aspects. In this sense, Manizales as the capital of the department of Caldas in Colombia has generated a conurbation with the nearest neighboring municipality, Villamaría reaching a combined population of 419 943. Although this synergy has taken place for several decades, these municipalities only have a place of connection, because they are separated by a geographical barrier, the Chinchiná River. This connection has had clear connection problems, due to the high flow of vehicles that move between both municipalities, so it is essential to project a second connection, to further boost mobility among its inhabitants. For this reason, in this research four (4) alternatives of connection are proposed, according to the suggestions of the Manizales 2017 Mobility Master Plan, through the calculation of the global average accessibility and the quantification of the gradient of savings generated in the average times of trip, based on the current situation of both cities. The results show which is the alternative that benefits population the most in terms of travel time savings, although three of them generate considerable savings and only one is discarded because it benefits a smaller number of inhabitants in very low percentages of savings compared to the others. The evaluation of infrastructure alternatives through the gradient of savings in travel times is useful to determine the best options in the pre-feasibility phase of investment projects in the transport area.

Suggested Citation

  • Diego Alexander Escobar & Santiago Cardona & Carlos Alberto Moncada, 2018. "Evaluation of Road Infrastructure Alternatives Through a Saving Gradient in Travel Times. Case Study: Second Connection Villamaría-Manizales, Colombia," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(8), pages 103-103, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:masjnl:v:12:y:2018:i:8:p:103
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/mas/article/download/76484/42495
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/mas/article/view/76484
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. van Wee, Bert, 2016. "Accessible accessibility research challenges," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 9-16.
    2. Carlos Alberto Moncada & Santiago Cardona & Diego Alexander Escobar, 2018. "Saving Travel Time as an Urban Planning Instrument. Case Study: Manizales, Colombia," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(6), pages 1-44, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Diego Alexander Escobar & Santiago Cardona & Carlos Alberto Moncada, 2018. "Relationship Between Accessibility to Polling Places and Electoral Abstention," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(9), pages 1-7, September.
    2. Singh, Shivendu Shekhar & Sarkar, Basudatta, 2022. "Transport accessibility and affordability as the determinant of non-motorized commuting in rural India," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 101-111.
    3. Khalili, Fatemeh Bagheri & Antunes, António Pais & Mohaymany, Afshin Shariat, 2020. "Evaluating interregional freight accessibility conditions through the combination of centrality and reliability measures," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    4. Chih-Hao Wang & Na Chen, 2021. "A multi-objective optimization approach to balancing economic efficiency and equity in accessibility to multi-use paths," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(4), pages 1967-1986, August.
    5. Lättman, Katrin & Olsson, Lars E. & Friman, Margareta, 2016. "Development and test of the Perceived Accessibility Scale (PAC) in public transport," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 257-263.
    6. Jean Ryan, 2020. "Examining the Process of Modal Choice for Everyday Travel Among Older People," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-19, January.
    7. Sun, Xiaoqian & Wandelt, Sebastian & Zhang, Anming, 2021. "Comparative accessibility of Chinese airports and high-speed railway stations: A high-resolution, yet scalable framework based on open data," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    8. Beria, Paolo & Debernardi, Andrea & Ferrara, Emanuele, 2017. "Measuring the long-distance accessibility of Italian cities," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 66-79.
    9. Renata Lúcia Magalhães de Oliveira & Camila Soares Henrique Fontanele Garcia & Paulo Henrique Góes Pinto, 2020. "Accessibility to Food Retailers: The Case of Belo Horizonte, Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-17, March.
    10. Giovanni Vecchio & Ignacio Tiznado-Aitken & Bryan Castillo & Stefan Steiniger, 2024. "Fair transport policies for older people: accessibility and affordability of public transport in Santiago, Chile," Transportation, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 689-715, April.
    11. Daniel Oviedo & Luis A. Guzman, 2020. "Revisiting Accessibility in a Context of Sustainable Transport: Capabilities and Inequalities in Bogotá," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-22, June.
    12. Guzman, Luis A. & Oviedo, Daniel & Rivera, Carlos, 2017. "Assessing equity in transport accessibility to work and study: The Bogotá region," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 236-246.
    13. Helai Huang & Jialing Wu & Fang Liu & Yiwei Wang, 2020. "Measuring Accessibility Based on Improved Impedance and Attractive Functions Using Taxi Trajectory Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-23, December.
    14. Natalia Distefano & Salvatore Leonardi & Nilda Georgina Liotta, 2023. "Walking for Sustainable Cities: Factors Affecting Users’ Willingness to Walk," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-18, March.
    15. Krysiński Dawid & Szczepański Jacek, 2025. "Transport-Related Social Exclusion Among Secondary School Students in Different Sub-Regions of Lower Silesia, Poland: An Activity-Based Approach," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 44(2), pages 45-58.
    16. Hamidi, Zahra & Camporeale, Rosalia & Caggiani, Leonardo, 2019. "Inequalities in access to bike-and-ride opportunities: Findings for the city of Malmö," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 673-688.
    17. Ana Gil Solá & Bertil Vilhelmson, 2018. "Negotiating Proximity in Sustainable Urban Planning: A Swedish Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, December.
    18. Hyun Kim & Yena Song, 2018. "An integrated measure of accessibility and reliability of mass transit systems," Transportation, Springer, vol. 45(4), pages 1075-1100, July.
    19. Guzman, Luis A. & Cantillo-Garcia, Victor A. & Oviedo, Daniel & Arellana, Julian, 2023. "How much is accessibility worth? Utility-based accessibility to evaluate transport policies," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    20. Mateos-Mínguez, Paloma & Arranz-López, Aldo & Soria-Lara, Julio A. & Lanzendorf, Martin, 2021. "E-shoppers and multimodal accessibility to in-store retail: An analysis of spatial and social effects," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:masjnl:v:12:y:2018:i:8:p:103. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.