IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/jsd123/v18y2025i1p77.html

Agricultural Innovation as a Determinant of a Sustainable Transition in Rural Territories: Evidence from Costa Rica

Author

Listed:
  • Jorge A. Rodriguez-Soto

Abstract

The predominant economic activities in rural territories are agriculture, tourism, and ecosystem services, with agriculture being the predominant one. The agricultural sector faces several critics regarding its sustainability and structural difficulties for innovation. Yet, some innovations in line with bioeconomy and the use of digital technologies in agriculture have potential to reconcile economic and environmental goals. Therefore, this research aims to determine the contribution of innovations in the agricultural sector to the sustainable transformation of rural territories in Costa Rica. This is achieved using a case study methodology, covering cases representative of more than 95% of the agriculture production of the country. Finding that these trends of innovation can foster the sustainability of the sector and rural territories while improving economic outcomes; that the biggest impact of these innovations is when the two trends, digital technologies and bioeconomy, are combined; and that the forms of governance play a paramount role in the democratization of innovation, especially for medium and small-sized producers, and in their diffusion within the territory.

Suggested Citation

  • Jorge A. Rodriguez-Soto, 2025. "Agricultural Innovation as a Determinant of a Sustainable Transition in Rural Territories: Evidence from Costa Rica," Journal of Sustainable Development, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 18(1), pages 1-77, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:jsd123:v:18:y:2025:i:1:p:77
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jsd/article/download/0/0/51151/55517
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jsd/article/view/0/51151
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Swinda F. Pfau & Janneke E. Hagens & Ben Dankbaar & Antoine J. M. Smits, 2014. "Visions of Sustainability in Bioeconomy Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-28, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maria Sylvia Macchione Saes & Beatriz Macchione Saes & Elis Regina Monte Feitosa & Peter Poschen & Adalberto Luis Val & Jacques Marcovitch, 2023. "When Do Supply Chains Strengthen Biological and Cultural Diversity? Methods and Indicators for the Socio-Biodiversity Bioeconomy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-18, May.
    2. Gerhard Weiss & Alice Ludvig & Ivana Živojinović, 2023. "Embracing the Non-Wood Forest Products Potential for Bioeconomy—Analysis of Innovation Cases across Europe," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-20, January.
    3. Carmen Priefer & Rolf Meyer, 2019. "One Concept, Many Opinions: How Scientists in Germany Think About the Concept of Bioeconomy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-21, August.
    4. Maciejczak, Mariusz, 2015. "What are Production Determinants of Bioeconomy?," Problems of World Agriculture / Problemy Rolnictwa Światowego, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, vol. 15(30), pages 1-10, December.
    5. P. J. Stephenson & Anca Damerell, 2022. "Bioeconomy and Circular Economy Approaches Need to Enhance the Focus on Biodiversity to Achieve Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-20, August.
    6. D'Amato, Dalia & Veijonaho, Simo & Toppinen, Anne, 2020. "Towards sustainability? Forest-based circular bioeconomy business models in Finnish SMEs," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    7. Idiano D’Adamo & Pasquale Marcello Falcone & Enrica Imbert & Piergiuseppe Morone, 2022. "Exploring regional transitions to the bioeconomy using a socio-economic indicator: the case of Italy," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 39(3), pages 989-1021, October.
    8. Di Letizia, Gerardo & De Lucia, Caterina & Pazienza, Pasquale & Cappelletti, Giulio Mario, 2023. "Forest bioeconomy at regional scale: A systematic literature review and future policy perspectives," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    9. Sarah Jansen & William Foster & Gustavo Anríquez & Jorge Ortega, 2021. "Understanding Farm-Level Incentives within the Bioeconomy Framework: Prices, Product Quality, Losses, and Bio-Based Alternatives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-21, January.
    10. Sebastian Hinderer & Andreas Kuckertz, 2022. "The bioeconomy transformation as an external enabler of sustainable entrepreneurship," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 2947-2963, November.
    11. Gava, Oriana & Galli, Francesca & Bartolini, Fabio & Brunori, Gianluca, 2014. "Sustainability of local versus global bread supply chains: a literature review," 2014 Third Congress, June 25-27, 2014, Alghero, Italy 173096, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA).
    12. Padi, Richard Kingsley & Chimphango, Annie, 2021. "Assessing the potential of integrating cassava residues-based bioenergy into national energy mix using long-range Energy Alternatives Planning systems approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    13. Sanz-Hernández, Alexia & Jiménez-Caballero, Paula & Zarauz, Irene, 2022. "Gender and women in scientific literature on bioeconomy: A systematic review," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    14. Stefan Bößner & Francis X. Johnson & Zoha Shawoo, 2020. "Governing the Bioeconomy: What Role for International Institutions?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-24, December.
    15. Tuğba Yeğin & Muhammad Ikram, 2022. "Performance Evaluation of Green Furniture Brands in the Marketing 4.0 Period: An Integrated MCDM Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-32, August.
    16. Gohar Nuhoff-Isakhanyan & Emiel F.M. Wubben & S.W.F. Omta, 2016. "Sustainability Benefits and Challenges of Inter-Organizational Collaboration in Bio-Based Business: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-17, March.
    17. Xiuxiang Li & Yanhan Hu, 2025. "Deconstruction of China's agricultural bioeconomy policies in the context of sustainable systems transition - Based on policy texts analysis," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 71(12), pages 664-679.
    18. Juha Peltomaa, 2018. "Drumming the Barrels of Hope? Bioeconomy Narratives in the Media," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-14, November.
    19. Beadle, Brian, 2023. "The design and application of an agricultural sustainability index using item response theory," EconStor Theses, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, number 278112.
    20. Korhonen, J. & Koskivaara, A. & Toppinen, A., 2020. "Riding a Trojan horse? Future pathways of the fiber-based packaging industry in the bioeconomy," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:jsd123:v:18:y:2025:i:1:p:77. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.