IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/jpl123/v18y2025i1p1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rules of Origin Within ASEAN and RCEP: Has It Been Resolved?

Author

Listed:
  • Tresnawati Tresnawati
  • Pan Lindawaty Suherman Sewu
  • Callista Rachelia

Abstract

As a well-established trading bloc, rules of origin (ROO) for ASEAN are expected to benefit member states’ businesses by providing preferential tariff treatment which is the fundamental purpose of trade liberalization. However, these rules are prevented from being applied thoroughly due to the lack of government trust in certain member states in business actors and targets of duty collection for customs authorities. The self-certification by business actors has proven to be a solution to the problem but ASEAN A-X Formula may be counterproductive to ROO, eliminating the foundation of regionalization and potentially causing trade deflection. The First Protocol of ASEAN Trade in Goods Agreement (ATIGA) amendment simplifies the procedure of operational certification for ROO. Furthermore, the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) as a significant trading pact including ASEAN members and five major trading partners has adopted proof of origin allowing self-certification applied earlier in the European Union and NAFTA. Alternative solutions should also be explored since distrust and national financial interests have not been resolved. Recently, blockchain embedded with smart contracts has been applied in various business sectors which should be further applied in free trade area (FTA) applications. Blockchain’s characteristics as an immutable ledger originating from the hashing process and cryptography would address the problem of ASEAN ROO application. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze the effectiveness of ROO within ASEAN and RCEP. A literature review and doctrinal study methodology were applied in this analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Tresnawati Tresnawati & Pan Lindawaty Suherman Sewu & Callista Rachelia, 2025. "Rules of Origin Within ASEAN and RCEP: Has It Been Resolved?," Journal of Politics and Law, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 18(1), pages 1-1, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:jpl123:v:18:y:2025:i:1:p:1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jpl/article/download/0/0/51006/55304
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jpl/article/view/0/51006
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Krishna, Kala & Salamanca, Carlos & Suzuki, Yuta & Volpe Martincus, Christian, 2025. "Learning to use trade agreements," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dzmitry Kniahin & Jaime de Melo, 2022. "A Primer on Rules of Origin as Non-Tariff Barriers," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-23, June.
    2. Legge, Stefan & Lukaszuk, Piotr, 2024. "The firm-level costs of utilizing free trade agreements," International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    3. Ornelas, Emanuel & Turner, John L., 2024. "The costs and benefits of rules of origin in modern free trade agreements," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    4. Head, Keith & Mayer, Thierry & Melitz, Marc, 2024. "The Laffer curve for rules of origin," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    5. Sonali Chowdhry & Gabriel Felbermayr, 2023. "Trade liberalization along the firm size distribution: The case of the EU‐South Korea FTA," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 1751-1792, November.
    6. Marius Fossum & Inga Heiland & Viktor Moulin, 2024. "Analyzing the Expiration of the United States Generalized System of Preferences and Its Impact on Imports from Developing Countries," CESifo Working Paper Series 11509, CESifo.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:jpl123:v:18:y:2025:i:1:p:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.