IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ijefaa/v17y2025i12p30.html

Strategic Supply Chain Integration and Competitive Advantage: An Essential Nexus in Vehicle Assembly Firms in Kenya

Author

Listed:
  • Irine Chebet Lang’at
  • Makau S. Muathe

Abstract

This research examined the impact of strategic supply chain integration on the competitive advantage of the vehicle assembly companies in Nairobi City County, Kenya. The Government of Kenya has given attention to the vehicle assembly industry since it forms part of its industrial development strategy, which includes pursued flagship programs such as Vision 2030 and the Big 4 Agenda. Nonetheless, despite these efforts, the Kenya Association of Manufacturers has reported challenges such as severe supply chain inefficiencies and coordination gaps between the assembler, the local suppliers and the modern inventory management systems. The business environment today thrives on rapid technological innovations and charters very robust competitive activity. This scenario has made supply chain integration not only a strategy of excellence, but one of the pillars of organizational success in the long run. In the Kenyan system of industrial development, the flagship initiatives have been emphasized. Nonetheless, even with these measures and efforts, the Kenya Association of Manufacturers notes that it continues to face challenges such as high supply chain inefficiencies, which lead to underutilization of capacity, disjointed coordination among assemblers and local suppliers, and inconsistent uptake of modern inventory management systems. The study focused on the interplay between information sharing, collaborations, lean operations, and inventory control, anchored on the Resource-Based View, Dynamic Capabilities Theory, and Porter Theory of Competitive Advantage. Descriptive research design was adopted, and primary data was collected using questionnaires from 109 stratified supply chain professionals from three large assembly firms (CFAO Mobility Kenya/KVM, Isuzu East Africa). A pilot study was conducted to determine the reliability and validity of the study. Descriptive statistical analysis reported high levels of internal information sharing and strategic collaborations, albeit, their lack of real-time data exchange to suppliers and underuse of automated inventory systems. Multiple regression analysis listed as significant predictors of competitive advantage all four strategic supply chain integration (SSCI) practices, while collaboration was the most substantial as a single predictor. However, the correlation analysis suggested the siloed and isolated nature of the practices, most notably, the gap between strategic information sharing and collaboration integration. Strategic supply chain integration, therefore, is a source of competitive advantage, albeit, remains underexploited and underpinned by the lack of synergistic integration to its components. The study advised companies in the Kenyan automotive industry to enhance the strength and competitiveness of their supply chains by creating consolidated digital supplier portals, developing collaborative operational taskforces, and acquiring automated inventory management systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Irine Chebet Lang’at & Makau S. Muathe, 2025. "Strategic Supply Chain Integration and Competitive Advantage: An Essential Nexus in Vehicle Assembly Firms in Kenya," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 17(12), pages 1-30, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ijefaa:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:30
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijef/article/download/0/0/52505/57186
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijef/article/view/0/52505
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David J. Teece & Gary Pisano & Amy Shuen, 1997. "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(7), pages 509-533, August.
    2. Nicole DeHoratius & Ananth Raman, 2008. "Inventory Record Inaccuracy: An Empirical Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(4), pages 627-641, April.
    3. Timothy J. Sturgeon & Johannes Van Biesebroeck, 2011. "Global value chains in the automotive industry: an enhanced role for developing countries?," International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(1/2/3), pages 181-205.
    4. Torbjørn H. Netland, 2016. "Critical success factors for implementing lean production: the effect of contingencies," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(8), pages 2433-2448, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qamar, A. & Gardner, E.C. & Buckley, T. & Zhao, K., 2021. "Home-owned versus foreign-owned firms in the UK automotive industry: Exploring the microfoundations of ambidextrous production and supply chain positioning," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(1).
    2. Carmen Elena Stoenoiu, 2025. "Perspectives on the development of digital techniques and tools with implications for accounting and financial audit services," GATR Journals jfbr232, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    3. Muhammad Sadiq & Mei Kei Leong & Ansa Savad Salim & Zhou Jiayao, 2025. "Fostering entrepreneurial success through the predictive role of knowledge management, green creativity, green social behavior, dynamic capabilities, business environment and green service innovation," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-27, December.
    4. Swen Nadkarni & Reinhard Prügl, 2021. "Digital transformation: a review, synthesis and opportunities for future research," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 71(2), pages 233-341, April.
    5. Kibaek Lee & Jaeheung Yoo & Munkee Choi & Hangjung Zo & Andrew P Ciganek, 2016. "Does External Knowledge Sourcing Enhance Market Performance? Evidence from the Korean Manufacturing Industry," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(12), pages 1-19, December.
    6. Panagiotis Trivellas & Georgios Malindretos & Panagiotis Reklitis, 2020. "Implications of Green Logistics Management on Sustainable Business and Supply Chain Performance: Evidence from a Survey in the Greek Agri-Food Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-29, December.
    7. Jiatong Yu & Jiajue Wang & Taesoo Moon, 2022. "Influence of Digital Transformation Capability on Operational Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-20, June.
    8. Chinho Lin & Ming-Lung Hsu & David C. Yen & Ping-Jung Hsieh & Hua-Ling Tsai & Tsung-Hsien Kuo, 2013. "Prototype system for pursuing firm’s core capability," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 497-509, July.
    9. Chin‐jung Luan & Chengli Tien & Pei‐hua Wu, 2013. "Strategizing Environmental Policy and Compliance for Firm Economic Sustainability: Evidence from Taiwanese Electronics Firms," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(8), pages 517-546, December.
    10. Adrian Gourlay & Jonathan Seaton, 2004. "The determinants of firm diversification in UK quoted companies," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(18), pages 2059-2071.
    11. repec:jpe:journl:1420 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Abiodun Tope Samson, 2015. "The Impact of Entrepreneurial Orientation, Reconfiguring Capability and Moderation of Environmental Turbulence on Export Performance of SMEs in Nigeria," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 7(3), pages 76-87.
    13. Precious Doe & Irene Akuamoah-Boateng, 2025. "Environmental entrepreneurial orientation and women’s entrepreneurial success: the role of social capital and traditional market innovation in sustainable market practices," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.
    14. Wipatkrut, Pattharaporn & Su, Hsin-Ning, 2025. "Exploring the impact of technological convergence on General-Purpose Technologies: A multi-level generality perspective," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    15. Jiaqiang Sun & Anita Binti Rosli & Adrian Daud, 2025. "Efficiency analysis of listed pharmaceutical companies in China: A method combining three-stage DEA with undesirable output, PCA, and tobit regression," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(8), pages 1-33, August.
    16. Piñeiro-Chousa, Juan & López-Cabarcos, M. Ángeles & Romero-Castro, Noelia María & Pérez-Pico, Ada María, 2020. "Innovation, entrepreneurship and knowledge in the business scientific field: Mapping the research front," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 475-485.
    17. Baldwin, Carliss Y. & Bogers, Marcel L.A.M. & Kapoor, Rahul & West, Joel, 2024. "Focusing the ecosystem lens on innovation studies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(3).
    18. Tobias Knabke & Sebastian Olbrich, 2018. "Building novel capabilities to enable business intelligence agility: results from a quantitative study," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 493-546, August.
    19. Filippo Carlo Wezel & Gino Cattani & Johannes M. Pennings, 2006. "Competitive Implications of Interfirm Mobility," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(6), pages 691-709, December.
    20. Christiana Müller & Stefan Vorbach, 2015. "Enabling Business Model Change: Evidence from High-Technology Firms," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 11(1), pages 53-75.
    21. Venugopal Gopalakrishna-Remani & Robert Paul Jones & Kerri M. Camp, 2019. "Levels of EMR Adoption in U.S. Hospitals: An Empirical Examination of Absorptive Capacity, Institutional Pressures, Top Management Beliefs, and Participation," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(6), pages 1325-1344, December.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ijefaa:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.