IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ijbmjn/v19y2024i5p121.html

Challenges in Accounting for Carbon: Analysis of Accounting Policies of the World's Largest Polluters

Author

Listed:
  • Sonia M. S. Gomes
  • Maisa S. Ribeiro
  • Fátima S. Freire
  • Luciana S. M. Sardeiro
  • Alana B. Guessi

Abstract

The study's focus was on examining the accounting policies related to carbon credits of the top 100 global GHG emitters, as mentioned by Kouloukoui et al. (2019). Of these 100, only 36 gave access to the CDP questionnaire. We used the model proposed by Lovell et al. (2010) to examine carbon credit accounting choices, employing content analysis with NVivo software and statistical analysis with Stata. The financial statements (FS) and explanatory notes of 247 companies from different countries and sectors, such as oil and gas, mining, coal, transport and marine logistics, and the chemical sector, were analyzed from 2015 to 2021. Finally, nine companies provided information on the accounting treatment for carbon credits. The results indicate a predominance of classification as inventories, followed by intangible assets, measurement at cost, and liabilities accounted for by the excess carbon credits owed about existing assets at market value. We observed significant heterogeneity in accounting policies, which remained over time. The lack of standardization and consistency in reporting methods and the concealment of accounting records in this context make it challenging to compare practices, compromising the evaluation of companies' performance, the decision-making of investors and other agents, and the transparency and accountability of this market. These findings highlight the need for a more coherent and rigorous approach to accounting for carbon credits, especially considering the urgent challenges of climate change.

Suggested Citation

  • Sonia M. S. Gomes & Maisa S. Ribeiro & Fátima S. Freire & Luciana S. M. Sardeiro & Alana B. Guessi, 2024. "Challenges in Accounting for Carbon: Analysis of Accounting Policies of the World's Largest Polluters," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 19(5), pages 121-121, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ijbmjn:v:19:y:2024:i:5:p:121
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijbm/article/download/0/0/50512/54715
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijbm/article/view/0/50512
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hopwood, Anthony G., 2009. "Accounting and the environment," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 34(3-4), pages 433-439, April.
    2. Celeste M. Black, 2013. "Accounting for Carbon Emission Allowances in the European Union: In Search of Consistency," Accounting in Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(2), pages 223-239, November.
    3. Delphine Gibassier & Sami El Omari & Philippe Naccache, 2020. "Institutional work in the birth of a carbon accounting profession," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 33(6), pages 1447-1476, June.
    4. repec:eme:aaaj00:aaaj-12-2014-1912 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rong He & Le Luo & Abul Shamsuddin & Qingliang Tang, 2022. "Corporate carbon accounting: a literature review of carbon accounting research from the Kyoto Protocol to the Paris Agreement," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(1), pages 261-298, March.
    2. Thereza RS de Aguiar, 2018. "Turning accounting for emissions rights inside out as well as upside down," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 36(1), pages 139-159, February.
    3. Saravanamuthu, Kala & Lehman, Cheryl, 2013. "Enhancing stakeholder interaction through environmental risk accounts," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 24(6), pages 410-437.
    4. Binh Bui & Carolyn Fowler, 2022. "Carbon controls in a New Zealand electricity utility: An application of theoretical triangulation," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(4), pages 4423-4451, December.
    5. Tregidga, Helen & Laine, Matias, 2022. "On crisis and emergency: Is it time to rethink long-term environmental accounting?," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    6. Vassili Joannides, 2011. "Apports De L'Ethnicite A La Culture En Sciences De Gestion," Post-Print hal-00676555, HAL.
    7. Mia Kaspersen & Thomas Riise Johansen, 2016. "Changing Social and Environmental Reporting Systems," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 135(4), pages 731-749, June.
    8. N'Gatta, Donald & Ormazabal, Gaizka & Raney, Robert, 2025. "Trading of emission allowances and reporting incentives," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(2).
    9. Yihao Guo & Yanwen Song & Yimin Wang, 2024. "Happy troubles? CSR awards and CSR report quality," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(4), pages 2989-3005, July.
    10. Rezaee, Zabihollah, 2016. "Business sustainability research: A theoretical and integrated perspective," Journal of Accounting Literature, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 48-64.
    11. Albrecht, Disen Huang & Anantharaman, Divya & Zhao, Keyi, 2025. "Is a picture worth a thousand words? Image usage in ESG reports," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    12. Philipp Borgstedt & Ann-Marie Nienaber & Bernd Liesenkötter & Gerhard Schewe, 2019. "Legitimacy Strategies in Corporate Environmental Reporting: A Longitudinal Analysis of German DAX Companies’ Disclosed Objectives," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(1), pages 177-200, August.
    13. Nirman Noor Afiqi Mat Yusoh & Tuan Zainun Tuan Mat, 2020. "Environmental Management Accounting Adoption Barriers Among Malaysian Hotel Companies," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 11(3), pages 31-42, June.
    14. Balluchi, Federica & Lazzini, Arianna & Torelli, Riccardo, 2020. "Credibility of Environmental Issues in Non-Financial Mandatory Disclosure: Measurement and Determinants," OSF Preprints g73w5, Center for Open Science.
    15. Wolfgang Drobetz & Dimitrios Gounopoulos & Anna Merika & Andreas Merikas, 2017. "Determinants of Management Earnings Forecasts: The Case of Global Shipping IPOs," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 23(5), pages 975-1015, October.
    16. Giuseppe Maria Bifulco & Carlo Caserio & Francesca di Donato & Sara Trucco, 2025. "Does Sustainable Performance Matter for Nonfinancial Disclosure Readability? A Fog Index Analysis on Italian‐Listed Companies," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(5), pages 5601-5623, July.
    17. Guidry, Ronald P. & Patten, Dennis M., 2012. "Voluntary disclosure theory and financial control variables: An assessment of recent environmental disclosure research," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 81-90.
    18. W. Eric Lee & Amy M. Hageman, 2018. "Talk the Talk or Walk the Walk? An Examination of Sustainability Accounting Implementation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 152(3), pages 725-739, October.
    19. Nick Sciulli, 2009. "Sustainability Reporting by Local Councils in Coastal Regions: An Australian Study," Asian Journal of Finance & Accounting, Macrothink Institute, vol. 1(1), pages 7686-7686, December.
    20. Zhang, Linhan & Tang, Qingliang & Huang, Robin Hui, 2021. "Mind the Gap: Is Water Disclosure a Missing Component of Corporate Social Responsibility?," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(1).

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ijbmjn:v:19:y:2024:i:5:p:121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.