IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ibrjnl/v11y2018i3p76-87.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adaptive Cost Accounting Control: Issues in Realizing Deming Synergy

Author

Listed:
  • Mohamed Gaber
  • Edward J. Lusk

Abstract

We report on a consultation addressing the re-configuration of a Standards Cost Accounting System of a major MNC. We identified two fundamental theoretical issues pertinent to this re-configuration: Their Standards Cost Accounting [SCA] System was (1) not adaptive within their control time frame, and (2) the holistic systemic protocols espoused by W. Edwards Deming were not used to condition the decision-making framework addressing control. We developed an adaptive Decision Support System [SCA:DSS] that offered the following integrated systemic features: (i) The SCA:DSS is parametrized using the Marketing/Sales sub-budget as approved by corporate-level management and (ii) is used to set the control standards for direct Materials & Labor costs and ABC related allocations, (iii) A detailed interactive profiling of production activity is produced at a time when adaptive corrective actions would still be reasonably possible, and (iv) Adaptive: Best, Stasis and Corrective Action Cases regarding the effect of these corrective actions on the contribution margin are displayed. However, even given the adaptive design features and the explicit designs to effect holistic integration over the pilot division and the central headquarters of the firm, the SCA: DSS failed to be implemented. We offer valuable insights into this failure-to-launch that may be indispensable in effecting a synergetic environment where adaptive holistic cost control may be realized. In this paper all of the technical functionalities of the SCA: DSS are detailed and a working illustration is provided. The SCA: DSS is offered as a free download without restrictions to its use.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohamed Gaber & Edward J. Lusk, 2018. "Adaptive Cost Accounting Control: Issues in Realizing Deming Synergy," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(3), pages 76-87, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ibrjnl:v:11:y:2018:i:3:p:76-87
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ibr/article/view/73503/40625
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ibr/article/view/73503
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martina K. Linnenluecke & Jacqueline Birt & Andrew Griffiths & Kathy Walsh, 2015. "The role of accounting in supporting adaptation to climate change," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 55(3), pages 607-625, September.
    2. Arthur T. Denzau & Henrik P. Minassians & Ravi K. Roy, 2016. "Learning to Cooperate: Applying Deming's New Economics and Denzau and North's New Institutional Economics to Improve Interorganizational Systems Thinking," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 69(3), pages 471-491, August.
    3. Russell L. Ackoff, 1967. "Management Misinformation Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(4), pages 147-156, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tingey-Holyoak, Joanne & Cooper, Bethany & Crase, Lin & Pisaniello, John, 2024. "A framework for supporting climate-exposed asset decision-making in agriculture," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    2. Mähring, Magnus, 2002. "IT Project Governance: A Process-Oriented Study of Organizational Control and Executive Involvement," SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Business Administration 2002:15, Stockholm School of Economics.
    3. Linnenluecke, Martina K. & Chen, Xiaoyan & Ling, Xin & Smith, Tom & Zhu, Yushu, 2017. "Research in finance: A review of influential publications and a research agenda," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 188-199.
    4. Halim Lee & Jaewon Son & Dayoon Joo & Jinhyeok Ha & Seongreal Yun & Chul-Hee Lim & Woo-Kyun Lee, 2020. "Sustainable Water Security Based on the SDG Framework: A Case Study of the 2019 Metro Manila Water Crisis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-19, August.
    5. Stewart Jones & Nurul Alam, 2019. "A machine learning analysis of citation impact among selected Pacific Basin journals," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 59(4), pages 2509-2552, December.
    6. Sivadasan, Suja & Smart, Janet & Huaccho Huatuco, Luisa & Calinescu, Anisoara, 2013. "Reducing schedule instability by identifying and omitting complexity-adding information flows at the supplier–customer interface," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(1), pages 253-262.
    7. Samuel Y. Todd & Tamara A. Crook & Tony Lachowetz, 2013. "Agency Theory Explanations of Self-Serving Sales Forecast Inaccuracies," Business and Management Research, Business and Management Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 2(2), pages 13-21, June.
    8. Kleijnen, J.P.C., 1977. "Operations research and computers," Research Memorandum FEW 66, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    9. Alex Richardson & Shirley Gregor & Richard Heaney, 2012. "Using decision support to manage the influence of cognitive abilities on share trading performance," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 37(3), pages 523-541, December.
    10. Linnenluecke, Martina K. & Chen, Xiaoyan & Ling, Xin & Smith, Tom & Zhu, Yushu, 2016. "Emerging trends in Asia-Pacific finance research: A review of recent influential publications and a research agenda," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 66-76.
    11. Serhii Lehenchuk & Nataliya Vyhovska, 2024. "Accounting for Government Grants According to IAS 20: The Problems and Directions for Improvement," Oblik i finansi, Institute of Accounting and Finance, issue 1, pages 14-21, March.
    12. Ion Georgiou & Joaquim Heck & Andrej Mrvar, 2019. "The Analysis of Interconnected Decision Areas: A Computational Approach to Finding All Feasible Solutions," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 543-563, June.
    13. Silvana Secinaro & Valerio Brescia & Davide Calandra & Buerhan Saiti, 2020. "Impact of climate change mitigation policies on corporate financial performance: Evidence‐based on European publicly listed firms," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(6), pages 2491-2501, November.
    14. Rita Di Mascio, 2016. "Firms’ adoption of self-service technology: how managerial beliefs shape co-production decisions," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 6(1), pages 79-97, June.
    15. Josephine Bremer & Martina K. Linnenluecke, 2017. "Determinants of the perceived importance of organisational adaptation to climate change in the Australian energy industry," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 42(3), pages 502-521, August.
    16. Irina Bogataya & Elena Evstafyeva & Denis Lavrov & Ekaterina Korsakova & Natalya Mukhanova & Svetlana Solyannikova, 2022. "Disclosure of Information in Risk Reporting in the Context of the Sustainable Development Concept," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-21, February.
    17. William F. Shughart & Diana W. Thomas & Michael D. Thomas, 2020. "Institutional Change and the Importance of Understanding Shared Mental Models," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(3), pages 371-391, August.
    18. Fogarty, Timothy J. & Campbell, Cory, 2024. "The big data crossroads: Accounting education and the challenge of 21st century technology," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    19. Fred Y. Robinson, 2021. "Underestimation of Jingle Fallacy Influences on Systems Acquisitions," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(4), pages 413-425, August.
    20. Spoor, E. & Boogaard, M., 1993. "Information systems flexibility : a conceptual framework," Serie Research Memoranda 0059, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ibrjnl:v:11:y:2018:i:3:p:76-87. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.