IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/hesjnl/v16y2026i2p22.html

High Acceptance, Low Adoption? Professional Identity, Accountability, and the Boundaries of Digital Adoption in Internal Auditing

Author

Listed:
  • Pongpanga Netharn
  • Choosak Ueangchokchai
  • Dech-siri Nopas

Abstract

This study investigates the persistent gap between technology acceptance and actual technology adoption among internal auditors in Thai public universities. While digital technologies are widely promoted as essential to contemporary audit practice, favorable perceptions do not consistently translate into meaningful integration. Drawing on qualitative data from ten in-depth interviews, this study explores how auditors interpret and negotiate digital technology within high-accountability professional environments. The findings reveal that adoption is shaped not only by perceived usefulness but also by professional identity preservation, perceived redistribution of authority, accountability-driven anxiety, cognitive demands, and constrained self-efficacy. Digital tools are not encountered as neutral instruments; rather, they are evaluated in relation to professional legitimacy, risk exposure, and confidence under scrutiny. The study argues that prevailing technology acceptance models overemphasize cognitive determinants while underestimating identity-mediated and emotion-mediated mechanisms. By analytically distinguishing acceptance from adoption, this research advances a more critical and context-sensitive understanding of digital transformation in expert professions. Sustainable adoption requires not only technical readiness but alignment with professional identity, authority structures, and psychological safety.

Suggested Citation

  • Pongpanga Netharn & Choosak Ueangchokchai & Dech-siri Nopas, 2026. "High Acceptance, Low Adoption? Professional Identity, Accountability, and the Boundaries of Digital Adoption in Internal Auditing," Higher Education Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 16(2), pages 1-22, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:hesjnl:v:16:y:2026:i:2:p:22
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/hes/article/download/0/0/52920/57702
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/hes/article/view/0/52920
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Juma, Calestous, 2016. "Innovation and Its Enemies: Why People Resist New Technologies," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780190467036.
    2. Kamal, Syeda Ayesha & Shafiq, Muhammad & Kakria, Priyanka, 2020. "Investigating acceptance of telemedicine services through an extended technology acceptance model (TAM)," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jinzhi Zou & Khairul Manami Kamarudin & Jing Liu & Jiaqi Zhang, 2024. "Towards Sustainable Mobility: Determinants of Intention to Purchase Used Electric Vehicles in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-20, October.
    2. Hoda M. Aboalsamh & Laith T. Khrais & Sami A. Albahussain, 2023. "Pioneering Perception of Green Fintech in Promoting Sustainable Digital Services Application within Smart Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-13, July.
    3. O'Brien, Patrick, 2018. "Cosmographies for the discovery, development and diffusion of useful and reliable knowledge in pre-industrial Europe and Late imperial China: a survey and speculation," Economic History Working Papers 90534, London School of Economics and Political Science, Department of Economic History.
    4. Lim, Joon Soo & Zhang, Jun, 2022. "Adoption of AI-driven personalization in digital news platforms: An integrative model of technology acceptance and perceived contingency," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    5. Talwar, Shalini & Kaur, Puneet & Escobar, Octavio & Lan, Sai, 2022. "Virtual reality tourism to satisfy wanderlust without wandering: An unconventional innovation to promote sustainability," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 128-143.
    6. Gao, Junzhe & Opute, Abdullah Promise & Jawad, Caroline & Zhan, Meng, 2025. "The influence of artificial intelligence chatbot problem solving on customers’ continued usage intention in e-commerce platforms: an expectation-confirmation model approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    7. Michael Addotey-Delove & Richard E. Scott & Maurice Mars, 2023. "Healthcare Workers’ Perspectives of mHealth Adoption Factors in the Developing World: Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-27, January.
    8. Subhodeep Mukherjee & Manish Mohan Baral & Chittipaka Venkataiah & Surya Kant Pal & Ramji Nagariya, 2021. "Service robots are an option for contactless services due to the COVID-19 pandemic in the hotels," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 48(4), pages 445-460, December.
    9. Biancone, Paolo & Secinaro, Silvana & Marseglia, Roberto & Calandra, Davide, 2023. "E-health for the future. Managerial perspectives using a multiple case study approach," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    10. Hind M. Alotaibi & Suhad S. Sonbul & Dina A. El-Dakhs, 2025. "Factors influencing the acceptance and use of ChatGPT among English as a foreign language learners in Saudi Arabia," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    11. Cannavacciuolo, Lorella & Capaldo, Guido & Ponsiglione, Cristina, 2023. "Digital innovation and organizational changes in the healthcare sector: Multiple case studies of telemedicine project implementation," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    12. Philipp Aerni, 2021. "The Ethics of Farm Animal Biotechnology from an Anthropological Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-16, March.
    13. Md. Alamgir Hossain & Ruhul Amin & Abdullah Al Masud & Md. Imran Hossain & Mohammad Awal Hossen & Mohammad Kamal Hossain, 2023. "What Drives People’s Behavioral Intention Toward Telemedicine? An Emerging Economy Perspective," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, July.
    14. Sprajcer, M. & Muchinguri, M. & Vincent, G.E. & Naweed, A., 2025. "How will the public respond to in-vehicle fatigue detection technology?," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    15. Leonie Kuen & Fiona Schürmann & Daniel Westmattelmann & Sophie Hartwig & Shay Tzafrir & Gerhard Schewe, 2023. "Trust transfer effects and associated risks in telemedicine adoption," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-22, December.
    16. Yaprak, Ümit & Kılıç, Fatih & Okumuş, Abdullah, 2021. "Is the Covid-19 pandemic strong enough to change the online order delivery methods? Changes in the relationship between attitude and behavior towards order delivery by drone," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    17. Cobelli, Nicola & Cassia, Fabio & Donvito, Raffaele, 2023. "Pharmacists' attitudes and intention to adopt telemedicine: Integrating the market-orientation paradigm and the UTAUT," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    18. Ibrahim Mutambik, 2024. "Culturally Informed Technology: Assessing Its Importance in the Transition to Smart Sustainable Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-20, May.
    19. repec:ehl:lserod:90534 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Niousha Shahidi & Vesselina Tossan & Stéphane Bourliataux-Lajoinie & Silvia Cacho-Elizondo, 2022. "Behavioural intention to use a contact tracing application: The case of StopCovid in France," Post-Print hal-03666263, HAL.
    21. Esmaeilzadeh, Pouyan, 2022. "Identification of barriers affecting the use of health information exchange (HIE) in clinicians' practices: An empirical study in the United States," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:hesjnl:v:16:y:2026:i:2:p:22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.