IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibf/ijbfre/v4y2010i4p121-134.html

The Different Proportion Of Ic Components And Firms’ Market Performance: Evidence From Taiwan

Author

Listed:
  • William S. Chang

Abstract

The study adjusts Pulic’s (2000) intellectual capital approach, “Value Added Intellectual Coefficient (VAICTM), to measure firms’ value creation and market performance. The research here adds two new intellectual capital components, Research and Development (R&D) expenditure and intellectual property, into Pulic's approach. Data were collected from 2005-2007 annual reports of companies listed on the Taiwan Stock Exchange Corporation (TSEC) and Market Observation Post System (MOPS). The results support the hypothesis that firms’ intellectual capital has a positive impact on market performance and its profitability in a modified VAIC method. The author finds that R&D expenditure and intellectual property (TCE) capture additional information about value creation. Furthermore, firms with a different intellectual capital contribution create a different market performance. Thus, in the knowledge-based economy, not only should the value of intellectual capital (IC) be considered, but also the allocation of IC. Finally, both information technology (IT)- and Non-IT corporations must value and manage their intellectual capital, particularly R&D and intellectual property, in order to create long-term competitiveness and create a higher market return.

Suggested Citation

  • William S. Chang, 2010. "The Different Proportion Of Ic Components And Firms’ Market Performance: Evidence From Taiwan," The International Journal of Business and Finance Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 4(4), pages 121-134.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibf:ijbfre:v:4:y:2010:i:4:p:121-134
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.theibfr2.com/RePEc/ibf/ijbfre/ijbfr-v4n4-2010/IJBFR-V4N4-2010-9.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. N/A, 2004. "Acknowledgement of Reviewers," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 28(4), pages 411-411, July.
    2. Ittner, CD & Larcker, DF, 1998. "Are nonfinancial measures leading indicators of financial performance? An analysis of customer satisfaction," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36, pages 1-35.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Franco Visani, 2017. "Applying business analytics for performance measurement and management. The case study of a software company," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2017(2), pages 89-123.
    2. Marco Haid & Elisabeth Nöhammer & Julia N. Albrecht & Alexander Plaikner & Harald Stummer & Peter Heimerl, 2021. "Health Promotion as a Motivational Factor in Alpine Cycling," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-12, February.
    3. Wei, Lang & Zhang, Yiling, 2023. "Nonfinancial indicators in identifying stock price crash risk," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    4. Dichev, Ilia D. & Qian, Jingyi, 2022. "The benefits of transaction-level data: The case of NielsenIQ scanner data," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(1).
    5. Lucianetti, Lorenzo & Chiappetta Jabbour, Charbel Jose & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Latan, Hengky, 2018. "Contingency factors and complementary effects of adopting advanced manufacturing tools and managerial practices: Effects on organizational measurement systems and firms' performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 318-328.
    6. Smith, Julia A. & England, Claire, 2019. "An ethnographic study of culture and performance in the UK lingerie industry," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 241-258.
    7. Carolyn J. Heinrich & Gerald Marschke, 2010. "Incentives and their dynamics in public sector performance management systems," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(1), pages 183-208.
    8. Raf Orens & Walter Aerts & Denis Cormier, 2010. "Web‐Based Non‐Financial Disclosure and Cost of Finance," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(9‐10), pages 1057-1093, November.
    9. Reem Fraih Alshiban & Khalid Rasheed Al-Adeem, 2022. "Empirically Investigating the Disclosure of Nonfinancial Information: A Content Study on Corporations Listed in the Saudi Capital Market," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-23, June.
    10. Paul J. Coram, 2010. "The effect of investor sophistication on the influence of nonfinancial performance indicators on investors’ judgments," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 50(2), pages 263-280, June.
    11. Margaret A. Abernethy & Jan Bouwens & Laurence Van Lent, 2013. "The Role of Performance Measures in the Intertemporal Decisions of Business Unit Managers," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3), pages 925-961, September.
    12. Eric Cauvin & Pierre-Laurent Bescos, 2005. "Nature Et Caracteristiques Des Informations Utilisees Par Les Entreprises Françaises Dans Le Cadre De Leur Communication Financiere : Une Etude Empirique," Post-Print halshs-00581142, HAL.
    13. A Mukherjee & P Nath & M Pal, 2003. "Resource, service quality and performance triad: a framework for measuring efficiency of banking services," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 54(7), pages 723-735, July.
    14. Ranjani Krishnan, 2019. "Discussion of “Information Asymmetries about Measurement Quality”," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(1), pages 72-81, March.
    15. Anamaria-Cătălina Radu & Ivona Stoica (Răpan) & Aida Catanã & Andra-Victoria Radu & Monica-Lavinia Dan, 2021. "European Funds in Tourism Sustainability—A Case Study of Beneficiaries’ Satisfaction Regarding the Process of Accessing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-13, August.
    16. Chiara Mio & Andrea Venturelli, 2013. "Non‐financial Information About Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy in the Annual Reports of Listed Companies: Evidence from Italy and the UK," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(6), pages 340-358, November.
    17. Coram, Paul J. & Mock, Theodore J. & Monroe, Gary S., 2011. "Financial analysts' evaluation of enhanced disclosure of non-financial performance indicators," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 87-101.
    18. M. Ishaq Bhatti & H. Awan & Z. Razaq, 2014. "The key performance indicators (KPIs) and their impact on overall organizational performance," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 48(6), pages 3127-3143, November.
    19. Villalonga, Belen, 2004. "Intangible resources, Tobin's q, and sustainability of performance differences," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 205-230, June.
    20. Sunil Dutta & Stefan Reichelstein, 2003. "Leading Indicator Variables, Performance Measurement, and Long‐Term Versus Short‐Term Contracts," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(5), pages 837-866, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G30 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibf:ijbfre:v:4:y:2010:i:4:p:121-134. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mercedes Jalbert The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Mercedes Jalbert to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.